Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drypowder

I realize 2010 was an off-cycle election year, but I wonder why these polling firms aren’t using party affiliation from 2010. I would think that the results from that election would be more indicative of what will happen in 2012.


15 posted on 09/26/2012 10:29:56 AM PDT by VA_Gentleman ("Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very internet you invented." -Jon Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: VA_Gentleman

They aren’t using 2010 data because it doesn’t fit their agenda and they certainly don’t want to give the Tea Party any credit for making such a huge difference.


17 posted on 09/26/2012 10:33:31 AM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: VA_Gentleman

2010 made it clear that if Obama had been on the ballot again he would have been put out yet they want us to believe that somehow he has far more support now than in 2010.


36 posted on 09/27/2012 5:19:35 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson