Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

October 2012 Political Report: Colorado Tragedy Leads to Proposed Ammo and Magazine Limits ^ | 24 September, 2012 | Chris W. Cox, NRA-ILA Executive Director

Posted on 09/26/2012 11:41:48 AM PDT by marktwain

Like the rest of the nation, all of us at the NRA were shocked and saddened by the tragedy in Aurora, Colo., this past July. We quickly issued a statement that our thoughts and prayers were with the victims, their families and the community, then we respectfully declined any further comment during the time of national mourning.

However, opponents of the Second Amendment were not nearly so reserved. Their outrageous but predictable response was to exploit the tragedy before the police had finished collecting evidence. The Brady Campaign’s new president bragged that “Within 48 hours of the terrible tragedy in Aurora, Colo., a new campaign was launched. … [it] shows just how ready the American public is to address gun violence.” Their “new” campaign consisted of a slick new website and Facebook page, pushing the same, tired gun control proposals they’ve been promoting for decades.

Politicians joined the fray. President Obama himself told the Urban League that “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals. … they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.” The remark was classic Obama: non-committal and meaningless, but consultant-tested to look good to his political base.

On Capitol Hill, Second Amendment opponents dusted off two proposals to restrict freedoms. In the Senate, Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., proposed an amendment to ban the import, possession and transfer of magazines that accept more than 10 rounds, and that are manufactured after the enactment of the amendment. Pre-ban magazines could be possessed by the current owner, but not transferred—even upon the owner’s death. The amendment provides for fines and up to 10 years in prison for violations—double the possible prison term under the 1994-2004 federal ban.

Lautenberg then teamed up with Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., to introduce a bill to ban the online sale of ammunition. Of course, ammunition is ammunition, whether it’s bought online or from a local gun store or “big box” retailer. Do they really think mass murderers will abandon their plans because they have to stop by a store? They also proposed a licensing requirement for ammunition dealers and recordkeeping on ammo sales—both of which were once federal law, and both of which were repealed in 1986 after the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms said the requirements had “no substantial law enforcement value.”

Others have suggested limiting the amount of ammunition a person can buy, or reporting purchases they consider “too large.” They have no clue how much ammunition is bought and sold in our country. The National Shooting Sports Foundation estimates that 10-12 billion rounds of ammunition are produced domestically each year, while billions more are imported.

A good summary of arguments against restricting ammunition sales was recently delivered by an unlikely source—the Obama administration’s top U.S. negotiator at the U.N. Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty. That statement said, “Ammunition is a fundamentally different commodity. … It is fungible, consumable, reloadable, and cannot be marked in any practical way that would permit it to be tracked or traced. Any practical proposal for ammunition would need to consider the significant burdens associated with licensing, authorizations, and recordkeeping for ammunition that is produced and transferred in the billions of rounds per year.”

The knee-jerk response is not limited to Washington, D.C. Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn made his bid for the spotlight by hijacking an NRA-supported bill that had already passed the legislature. He vetoed the bill, then abused his powers to rewrite it as a ban and registration scheme on virtually every detachable-magazine semi-auto rifle and countless pistols and shotguns, with restrictions far beyond the scope of even the Clinton gun ban.

All this exploitation ignores a stark reality. The suspect in the shootings was charged with 142 counts of murder and attempted murder. He also violated hundreds of other state and federal laws relating to firearms and violence. It has been reported that the college psychiatrist who was treating the suspect had notified a “threat assessment team” that she was alarmed by his behavior; but nothing was done.

No gun law in the world can remedy the deficiencies we have seen time and time again in how the authorities handle—or fail to handle—people with dangerous mental illness. Addressing that problem, rather than assailing the rights of the law-abiding, should be the real challenge for lawmakers to face.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: ban; banglist; co; nra
The anti-freedom types repeatedly tell us that they respect the Second Amendment. Yet, here they are attempting to ban magazines for the rifles that are most suitable for militia use, even when those rifles are used in less than half the murders nationally that are committed with hands and feet. Murders committed with hhands and feet, 801, committed with *all* rifles (of which militia style rifles are a small percentage) 348.
1 posted on 09/26/2012 11:41:59 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I’m sick of calling what happened in Colorado a “tragedy”!

What it was is absolutely premeditated mass murder.

2 posted on 09/26/2012 11:46:17 AM PDT by basil (Second Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Read it and....

VOTE in NOVEMBER with renewed sense of purpose/fear.


3 posted on 09/26/2012 11:56:52 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

This is what the killer wanted isn’t it?

A good reason to NOT do it.

4 posted on 09/26/2012 12:01:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Create a false crises to stampede the ignorant sheeple and they will cast off their liberty and freedom and willingly put the shackles of slavery on themselves.

" have now rejected your God, who saves you out of all your calamities and distresses. And you have said, 'No, set a king over us.'..." 1st Samuel 10:19

5 posted on 09/26/2012 12:05:28 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella

“Those who forsake essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

-Benjamin Franklin

6 posted on 09/26/2012 12:22:32 PM PDT by Emperor Palpatine ("On the ascent of Olympus, what's a botched bar or two?" -Artur Schnabel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: basil

That’s a very good point. Shows the semantic hijacking by the left and the social engineering by the (lefty) media. Funny how those things can slip right by ya sometimes...

7 posted on 09/26/2012 12:25:52 PM PDT by Unc1e_Ivan (People sleep peaceably at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
October 2012 Political Report: Colorado Tragedy Leads to Proposed Ammo and Magazine Limits

Well of course it did. Everyone knows that banning gus/magazines/ammo/etc. makes you safer. The more helpless you are the safer you are. Surely everyone can see that. Meanwhile lets give the police/the epa/fema/hud/tsa/etc. more powers and arm them like a modern combat squad and crank up or taxes to pay salaries for armed government parasites swilling at the public trough. THAT will really make the rest of us safe.

8 posted on 09/26/2012 12:40:54 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Why don’t they instead mandate adults have to go around armed?

Or you can pay a couple thousand dollars each year for the privilege of running around like an unarmed victim expecting everyone else to take care of any problems.

9 posted on 09/26/2012 6:14:13 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson