Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama and the Millennials (Bigger government won't help the young, but do they know that?)
NRO ^ | 09/27/2012 | Michael Barone

Posted on 09/27/2012 5:18:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

In 2008, voters under 30 preferred Barack Obama over John McCain by a 66 percent–to–32 percent margin. Among older voters, Obama led McCain by 50 to 49 percent.

How has Obama paid back the millennial generation, which provided almost all his margin of victory? With what American Interest superblogger Walter Russell Mead calls “Obama’s war on the young.”

Mead is not a tea-party crazy or Ayn Rand zealot. He is a history professor at Bard College and an expert on American foreign policy. He voted for Obama in 2008, and he’s not wild about Mitt Romney this year.

Nevertheless, he argues persuasively that America is undergoing a “transformation from a late-stage industrial society to an early-stage information society [that] is disruptive and painful but ultimately liberating and benign.”

Post–World War II America was a nation of big units: The leaders of big government, big business, and big labor made decisions and provided security for those in their organizations.

If you went to college, you could go into management or a profession and expect a lifetime of good earnings and a comfy pension. If you got a factory job, it was for life, and unions bargained for ever-higher wages and benefits.

That’s not the America we live in anymore. Government has grown bigger. But big business doesn’t generate jobs; most are created by small businesses and startups. Unions have shrunk, and most union members are public employees.

Meanwhile, public policies haven’t changed with the times. Every year, government transfers increasing amounts from working-age taxpayers to the elderly through Social Security and Medicare. Obamacare amplifies this by requiring young workers to buy expensive insurance far beyond their needs.

In the meantime, the collective impact of Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, and the fiscal cliff we are headed toward — all Obama policies — has cut job growth below the rate of population increase. Why?

“If you are a small business,” observes Richard Fisher of the Dallas Fed, “you are stymied by not knowing what your tax rate will be in future years, or how you should cost out the social overhead of your employees, or how you should budget from the proliferation of regulations flowing from Washington.”

At the same time, Obama vows to resist any changes in Medicare, which is on a trajectory to welsh on its obligations well before the first millennial turns 65.

For the young, Obama promises to expand college loans. But just as housing policies created a housing bubble, college-loan policies have created a higher-education bubble. The flood of money has been captured by colleges and universities through above-inflation tuition increases and administrative bloat.

The Obama administration does not crack down on them, however, but on graduates or dropouts with thousands in college-loan debt that they can’t escape through bankruptcy.

Overall, Obama stands for maintaining and expanding the welfare state that operated tolerably well in the big-unit America of half a century ago but is coming apart in our early-stage information society today.

His green-energy programs have fizzled out as solar-panel companies go bankrupt. Meanwhile the private sector has developed bounteous supplies of oil and natural gas through fracking.

His favorite high-tech project is to build enormously expensive high-speed-rail lines like the one Jerry Brown is pushing in California.

Meanwhile, Google is developing self-driving cars that will be able to move faster and more efficiently than current cars because their 21st-century technology, like the 19th-century technology of fixed rails, effectively prevents cars from colliding.

Nineteenth-century fixed rails take you where the railroad, or its government subsidizer, wants you to go. Self-driving cars will take you where you want to go, with as many stops as you like along the way.

That’s in line with the way millennials lead their lives. The iPod/Facebook generation fashions its own playlists and friends lists, rather than letting central decisionmakers choose them.

Obama’s policies, from Obamacare to high-speed rail, treat people as identical cogs in a very large machine, part of a mindless mass that would not be able to get along without government guidance.

In the information age, these industrial-age policies have prevented the vibrant economic growth which gives young people the opportunity to find work and community service that maximizes their own special talents and interests — to shape their own world and choose their own future.

— Michael Barone is senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: millenials; obama

1 posted on 09/27/2012 5:18:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I sometimes wonder why Libs don't just hand their kids over to the Government right after they are born. They obviously believe that the Government is better at raising kids than they (the Libs) are. Maybe the Libs should move to Cuba. Then they can experience complete Government control without ruining our country.
2 posted on 09/27/2012 5:21:38 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Americans want high paying jobs in factories and offices, with good job security based on performance, then stop globalizing your economy. If the Apple iPod was built in the US and gives the user advantages over the nonusers, everyone in the world and the US will want one, even if it costs alot. American factories and workers will be humming meeting world and domestic demands because nowhere in the world the product is being produced. This will be possible if the US keeps her trade secrets secret. Instead we leave our fate in corporate boardrooms, who would not hesitate to sell all of US secrets so it can be produced cheaply and sold expensively to padd their profit margins. I am not saying one does not profit, but profit at the price of your own country, own workers, own citizens, own security. Spin is globalism is good, well today we face threat from a high tech China, we already dodged the dominance of corporate Japan of the 1970’s. I know many FR would pooh pooh this notion and claim this will not work. Remember China kept the secret of silk for centuries and prospered. If China ever gets the upper hand economicaly and technologically, they will keep trade secrets, keep their own workers employed because their gov see this vital to their political survival. The US leaders do not see employment as key for national security and stability, when history have proven otherwise. This is one of the reasons why the US is going through a period of unhappiness and anger. Globalist and free traders keep stoking this anger and one day it will explode.

3 posted on 09/27/2012 6:03:01 AM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
National Seniors is claimed as the source. The source is National Review Online. Are you having a senior moment? I think their subtitle is much more cogent, IMHO.
He has industrial-age solutions for information-age challenges.

4 posted on 09/27/2012 11:06:55 AM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson