Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Yes, Dems likely have 2-4 point advantage in November
Washington Examiner ^ | 9-29-2012 | Byron York

Posted on 09/29/2012 8:21:34 PM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last
To: smoothsailing

I see the turnout for white Democrats as being bad, which will help the GOP in Senate and House races.


101 posted on 09/29/2012 10:03:29 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Take two Aspirin and call me in November - Obama for Hindmost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: antonico

Excellent points. I’m sensing something big in the making. I just hope once Romney is President we stay on him like white on rice. He’ll have his hands full getting us back on track and it’s up to us to watch him like a hawk. No, make that an Eagle!


102 posted on 09/29/2012 10:05:22 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

It’s a shocking statstic that anyone that was honest would say is clearly racist. Well ok I would be shocked if 96% backed a Black Republican. However, most of those 96% know they are guaranteed a pay raise under Obama.


103 posted on 09/29/2012 10:07:04 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: antonico
A lot of Republicans in 2008 stayed away from the POTUS section of the ballot because of McCain. I think that number was significant.

I doubt that, especially with Palin on the ticket. Let's keep in mind Obama got 69 million votes and McCain 59 million. In 2004, Bush got 62 million and Kerry 59 million (up from 50 million for each candidate in 2000). I don't think anyone stayed home in 2008. But about 5% of former Bush voters appear to have voted for Obama, plus 7 million brand new voters.

And I believe, unlike with McCain, a significant amount of conservatives will stay home for Romney and that the failure to turn out his base will be his greatest weakness in this election. Social issue voters are often single-issue voters. McCain was a convincing, long-time pro-life, anti-same-sex-marriage candidate. Romney's credentials on those issues are as questionable as they get for any Republican.

104 posted on 09/29/2012 10:09:53 PM PDT by JediJones (KARL ROVE: "And remember, this year, no one is seriously talking about ending abortion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RaisingCain

“Only the MittBots think Romney is something that he isn’t.”

Only an Obot muzzie loving commie can’t see the difference between the two, jackass.


105 posted on 09/29/2012 10:11:06 PM PDT by 1035rep (Obama: "I killed Bin Laden" ...you didn't do that. Somebody else made that happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
You're welcome! Let's roll people!
106 posted on 09/29/2012 10:14:10 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
It would be interesting to compare how party turnout changed from 2006 to 2010. Then whatever difference occurred there, apply it to 2008 to predict a 2012 number.

Interesting. . Any number crunchers out there got this figured out yet? Ras? Laz?

107 posted on 09/29/2012 10:19:06 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

This doesn’t sound like bad news to me. Gotta read the entire article to understand the meaning.


108 posted on 09/29/2012 10:20:36 PM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Fatal Flaw....Romney winning women by 3% and losing men by 7%? That is where you see a sampling error. And a fairly substantial one I would say.


109 posted on 09/29/2012 10:24:30 PM PDT by johncocktoasten (Practicing asymetrical thread warfare against anti-Palin Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
That the worst POTUS ever even has a chance says more about our sicko society than I wanted to know.

If it's close, we're done!

110 posted on 09/29/2012 10:24:58 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

“And you can bet your last penny obama will be provided with all the questions in advance so he will have well prepared answers.”

Yep. And they’ll probably let him sing too. I I’m so in love with you. Someone in the audience will faint and Governor Romney will stand there looking like Charlie Brown.


111 posted on 09/29/2012 10:25:44 PM PDT by FryingPan101 (2016 looms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: johncocktoasten

Polls aren’t necessarily accurate when divided up into smaller demographic groups. That doesn’t mean the overall total isn’t accurate. Naturally, the sample of men or women in the poll is only half the total sample. And if the total sample was just the minimum quantity needed to be accurate, half of the total will be only half what is needed to be accurate about each gender’s preferences. Rasmussen would need to double his original sample size in order to get accurate numbers for each gender. Otherwise the original poll can only be accurate for the group it defines, i.e. voters, not for smaller sub-groups within it.


112 posted on 09/29/2012 10:29:27 PM PDT by JediJones (KARL ROVE: "And remember, this year, no one is seriously talking about ending abortion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

“Only an Obot muzzie loving commie can’t see the difference between the two, jackass.”


There isn’t any difference MittBot, other than that he isn’t Obama. And outside of political junkies, most people who learn more about Romney who dislike Obama tend to seriously consider just staying home. I’ve seen it happen. Romney is a damaged candidate because of his policy positions and his dishonesty, which are on par with Obama’s. That is why approval ratings are low for both Obama and Mittens, when Mittens hasn’t even had a chance to BE President yet, and why one cannot seem to beat the other outright even with a trashed economy and our embassies burning over seas. Not my fault your RNC programming won’t allow you to calculate that.


113 posted on 09/29/2012 10:32:26 PM PDT by RaisingCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

“I doubt that, especially with Palin on the ticket.”

Nobody casts a vote for Vice President for the simple reason that a Vice President has no official policy making function. They are largely figureheads. Their official title is “Presdient of the Senate”, but how often does a veep ever show up there to make any sort of policy decisions? Almost never.

Your other points are well taken, but 69 million Obama voters gives a lot of pause. Turns out a significant number of them proved to be false - that’s why ACORN went into oblivion after being indicted in 15 states. Obama had “voters” apparenly living in homes that were vacant. His 2008 “ground game” had “block captains” living in each neighborhood to identify those who had moved away to another voting district, and their vacated units became home to a stunning number of non-habitating residents, all of whom somehow consistently voted for Obama from a home they never lived in. That’s the stuff not in effect now - nowhere near it. It’s like his twitter following of 18 million. A British group investigated and discovered 70% of Obama’s twitter followers don’t even exist.

I grew up in Cincinnati. Two weeks ago I was on the phone with my mom, as she was watching the local news cover Obama’s appearance there. You wanna know where he spoke? Eden Park - a public park. Say what you want about settings, this is NOT a place where you would - or even could - host a large crowd. Romney was in Cincinnati the week before, at Union Terminal, the former train station turned into a destination. Romney played to nearly 10,000 people. Obama had less than a third of that - which is why he was in the park and not the train station. So whatever he allegedly had in 2008, it’s clearly gone. The Smoke has cleared and the Mirrors are cleaned. When the POTUS shows up in the same town a week after his rival does and draws less than a third of the crowd, it can’t be good. No matter what 2008 was like.


114 posted on 09/29/2012 10:34:15 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

“I doubt that, especially with Palin on the ticket.”

Nobody casts a vote for Vice President for the simple reason that a Vice President has no official policy making function. They are largely figureheads. Their official title is “Presdient of the Senate”, but how often does a veep ever show up there to make any sort of policy decisions? Almost never.

Your other points are well taken, but 69 million Obama voters gives a lot of pause. Turns out a significant number of them proved to be false - that’s why ACORN went into oblivion after being indicted in 15 states. Obama had “voters” apparenly living in homes that were vacant. His 2008 “ground game” had “block captains” living in each neighborhood to identify those who had moved away to another voting district, and their vacated units became home to a stunning number of non-habitating residents, all of whom somehow consistently voted for Obama from a home they never lived in. That’s the stuff not in effect now - nowhere near it. It’s like his twitter following of 18 million. A British group investigated and discovered 70% of Obama’s twitter followers don’t even exist.

I grew up in Cincinnati. Two weeks ago I was on the phone with my mom, as she was watching the local news cover Obama’s appearance there. You wanna know where he spoke? Eden Park - a public park. Say what you want about settings, this is NOT a place where you would - or even could - host a large crowd. Romney was in Cincinnati the week before, at Union Terminal, the former train station turned into a destination. Romney played to nearly 10,000 people. Obama had less than a third of that - which is why he was in the park and not the train station. So whatever he allegedly had in 2008, it’s clearly gone. The Smoke has cleared and the Mirrors are cleaned. When the POTUS shows up in the same town a week after his rival does and draws less than a third of the crowd, it can’t be good. No matter what 2008 was like.


115 posted on 09/29/2012 10:34:32 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

“I doubt that, especially with Palin on the ticket.”

Nobody casts a vote for Vice President for the simple reason that a Vice President has no official policy making function. They are largely figureheads. Their official title is “Presdient of the Senate”, but how often does a veep ever show up there to make any sort of policy decisions? Almost never.

Your other points are well taken, but 69 million Obama voters gives a lot of pause. Turns out a significant number of them proved to be false - that’s why ACORN went into oblivion after being indicted in 15 states. Obama had “voters” apparenly living in homes that were vacant. His 2008 “ground game” had “block captains” living in each neighborhood to identify those who had moved away to another voting district, and their vacated units became home to a stunning number of non-habitating residents, all of whom somehow consistently voted for Obama from a home they never lived in. That’s the stuff not in effect now - nowhere near it. It’s like his twitter following of 18 million. A British group investigated and discovered 70% of Obama’s twitter followers don’t even exist.

I grew up in Cincinnati. Two weeks ago I was on the phone with my mom, as she was watching the local news cover Obama’s appearance there. You wanna know where he spoke? Eden Park - a public park. Say what you want about settings, this is NOT a place where you would - or even could - host a large crowd. Romney was in Cincinnati the week before, at Union Terminal, the former train station turned into a destination. Romney played to nearly 10,000 people. Obama had less than a third of that - which is why he was in the park and not the train station. So whatever he allegedly had in 2008, it’s clearly gone. The Smoke has cleared and the Mirrors are cleaned. When the POTUS shows up in the same town a week after his rival does and draws less than a third of the crowd, it can’t be good. No matter what 2008 was like.


116 posted on 09/29/2012 10:34:47 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

The difficult thing when looking at overall turnout of past elections is that Romney will have to match or beat the highest voter turnout ever for a Republican president, Bush in 2004 (62 million), and ALSO reduce Obama’s 2008 turnout (69 million) by at least 10% to win.


117 posted on 09/29/2012 10:38:01 PM PDT by JediJones (KARL ROVE: "And remember, this year, no one is seriously talking about ending abortion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: RaisingCain
And outside of political junkies, most people who learn more about Romney who dislike Obama tend to seriously consider just staying home. I’ve seen it happen.

I've seen it happen in PA. In this case it was more about Romney's personality and perceived intelligence than his political positions. This is not someone who would stay home but someone who said Romney is so unlikable that he might actually make them consider voting for Obama.

118 posted on 09/29/2012 10:43:07 PM PDT by JediJones (KARL ROVE: "And remember, this year, no one is seriously talking about ending abortion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: RaisingCain

You’re delusional OBot.


119 posted on 09/29/2012 10:44:43 PM PDT by 1035rep (Obama: "I killed Bin Laden" ...you didn't do that. Somebody else made that happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

I’ve heard that a lot of Dems are voting Repub for the first time in their lives.


120 posted on 09/29/2012 10:47:05 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

“I’ve seen it happen in PA. In this case it was more about Romney’s personality and perceived intelligence than his political positions. This is not someone who would stay home but someone who said Romney is so unlikable that he might actually make them consider voting for Obama.”


Romney is better the more anonymous he is, and his campaign of being the more efficient Obama isn’t helping him, it’s hurting him. This fight, therefore, will be a personality and intelligence contest. It shall rise and fall with the zinger and the catchy phrase, or with events outside of the Obama vs Romney match. If the Republicans are lucky, the economy will collapse under Obama instead of next year. Obama asked the Euros to prop up Greece at least until after the election. We’ll see how successful they are.


121 posted on 09/29/2012 10:52:29 PM PDT by RaisingCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

If it is close, Romney is going to win because the undecided would break at least 2:1 toward him...


122 posted on 09/29/2012 10:53:10 PM PDT by Conservative12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"Rasmussen: Yes, Dems likely have 2-4 point advantage in November"

Far enough. How many of that "2-4" points are voting for hussein again?

123 posted on 09/29/2012 10:55:09 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

He is hedging. Basically he’s saying, based on the historical party identification and turn out, Democrats have 2-4% advantage, so Obama might win. However, we have many people who are on the fence. Historically,they break for the non-incumbent, so Romney might win. Either way, he’ll keep the status of most accurate pollster.


124 posted on 09/30/2012 12:11:17 AM PDT by paudio (Post-racial society: When we can legitimately hire and fire a Black man without feeling guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

+15% of white democrats for Romney
+15% of middle class families for Romney
+15% of independents for Romney

That’s huge and Romney IS NOT GOING TO LOSE with those numbers.


125 posted on 09/30/2012 1:13:02 AM PDT by MrDem (Founder: Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untwist
The debates will turn this in our favor.

The people whose minds can be changed will feel they have no reason to watch them if the polls show a zombie landslide long enough.

126 posted on 09/30/2012 1:18:01 AM PDT by Ingtar (Everyone complains about the weather, but only Liberals try to legislate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Basically he’s saying, based on the historical party identification and turn out, Democrats have 2-4% advantage, so Obama might win

Like 1994, and 2010, the great conservative and even moderate American sleeping giant will turnout and MAKE HISTORY. This WILL NOT BE a "normal election". They (we) are deeply fearful for our nation and will turn out and vote.

127 posted on 09/30/2012 1:20:40 AM PDT by MrDem (Founder: Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: antonico

Why are those shenanigans not in effect? All ACORN did was change names and split into disguised companies.


128 posted on 09/30/2012 1:23:41 AM PDT by Ingtar (Everyone complains about the weather, but only Liberals try to legislate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

What I would like to know is who are those 10% registered Republicans who are voting for Obama!!!

Also, with the economy being the most important issue for most voters, how can so many in each category vote for Obama?!


129 posted on 09/30/2012 1:38:59 AM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Our 16% edge in enthusiasm plus Catholic vote and Obama’s done for.


130 posted on 09/30/2012 2:54:00 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

There is no way Obama gets 10% of the GOP vote. If anything he gets 5-6%. There are going to be way fewer O-bubican votes coming down SCOAMF’S way.

On the other hand if Obama loses 10-12% of the base to Romney and loses 51-53% of Indies, it’s going to be an early, very happy night.


131 posted on 09/30/2012 3:08:23 AM PDT by princeofdarkness (The Obama Administration is circling the wagons. But the Truth Indians are using flaming arrows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Think of how many self-identified Democrats register that way because of their union jobs in the private sector or government employment. How they vote is a different story.

In addition, after the Bush big government fiasco, many GOP members became independents or small “L” libertarians. They won’t be thrilled voting for Romney but it is about getting Obama out of office as the greater of two evils.

Just these two groups alone should skew the numbers 10% or so towards the GOP. Factor in a depressed voter turnout for Obamessiah by his key constituencies, and it is a rout even with the voter fraud that will occur.


132 posted on 09/30/2012 3:13:23 AM PDT by peyton randolph (FUBO and his wookie beard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

polling as most here know has become very political. it’s seems most of the polling data is very suspect. let’s not forget the recent threats from Obama admin against Gallup. that was about a month ago. everyone’s talking about biased polling:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/09/27/everyone_is_talking_about_skewed_polls

http://townhall.com/columnists/johngiokaris/2012/09/26/presidential_polls_2012_skewed_polling_and_biased_media_coverage_give_obama_false_advantage_over_romney

http://nation.foxnews.com/polling/2012/09/26/dick-morris-poll-numbers-are-not-accurate

Another, site Dick Morris has been talking about:
http://unskewedpolls.com/

Please bookmark and pass around. Numbers seem more accurate to me. Get the word out to the community. The author of the unskewed polls site wrote several articles as well about these issues. This is psychological warfare. We need to counter this in any way we can. It’s done to suppress voter turnout and to give the perception that something is reality that in fact is not.


133 posted on 09/30/2012 3:25:06 AM PDT by montesquiue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Leto

First, polling has never been an exact science, far from it.
Modern polling methods started with Gallup in 1936 just in tine for the Roosevelt-Landon election. Gallup picked the winner and embarrassed the Literary Digest out of business.

Yet even back then, Gallup wasn’t accurate. From 1936-1952 they were mediocre to terrible(especially Dewey-Truman in ‘48). From 1956-1976 they were pretty accurate with very good results in 1960 and 1968. However, from 1980-2012 with the exception of 1984 and 2004, they have been simply crap.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/9442/Election-Polls-Accuracy-Record-Presidential-Elections.aspx


134 posted on 09/30/2012 3:35:24 AM PDT by princeofdarkness (The Obama Administration is circling the wagons. But the Truth Indians are using flaming arrows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

WVA has a 3 to 1 Democrat advantage and Obama won’t win that state


135 posted on 09/30/2012 4:19:51 AM PDT by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing








FYI



Rasmussen has been a registered
democrat since Jimmy Carter!










136 posted on 09/30/2012 4:25:43 AM PDT by devolve (----- ------- ------------c.1000_and_c.1620-------- ----------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The election is close. Absent a serious screwup by either candidate it will remain close. It all boils down to turnout. hussein is a failed president with an incredible political machine and support of the state media. willard is a reasonably competent non-conservative with a much improved political machine. Neither inspire much enthusiasm outside of their hardcore supporters.

I think the south to a state goes for willard and the north with the possible exception of NH goes for hussein. And the election ends up being decided in the midwest.

The states to watch on the east coast are VA, FL, and PA. If PA, FL and VA go for willard, it’s over for hussein. If PA, FL and VA go for hussein, it’s over for willard. If it salts out how I think it will, PA will go for hussein, VA and FL go for willard and it’s decided in the midwest.


137 posted on 09/30/2012 4:48:31 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

Like 1994, and 2010, the great conservative and even moderate American sleeping giant will turnout and MAKE HISTORY. This WILL NOT BE a “normal election”. They (we) are deeply fearful for our nation and will turn out and vote.

Both of those elections were mid-terms when Democrats don’t typically vote.


138 posted on 09/30/2012 4:53:09 AM PDT by napscoordinator (GOP Candidate 2020 - "Bloomberg 2020 - We vote for whatever crap the GOP puts in front of us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

I suppose it is possible he does not just use his affiliation numbers directly in his party affiliation models for some reason or another that I suppose only he could explain.
+++++++++++++++
Raz does not use his party affiliation results in his Turnout Model. He collects that data and may use it to fudge his D+2 to D+4 model one way or another but, based on the article, he thinks the historical voting patterns are the more important element.

Note that Unskewedpolls.com does use the Rasmussen party affiliation figure as the likely Turnout Model. Right now that number is, IIRC, R+4. Compare that to Rasmussen’s presumed D+3 and you have a 7 point differential.

Not good.

OTOH, we should win if it’s D+2, we normally do. This race is still winnable. We did it in 2010 and we will do it in 2012.


139 posted on 09/30/2012 4:57:47 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

That has nothing to do with the magnitude of the GOP turnout, what I referred to.


140 posted on 09/30/2012 4:59:53 AM PDT by MrDem (Founder: Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: lgwdnbdgr

“a conclusion that MIGHT be true but fir which there is no evidence to indicate WILL be true”

Okay, but why does erring in the side of caution always mean erring on the side of Democrats? Because of party affiliation? But they can’t judge when voters will jump parties, nor when turnout will be depressed, nor how indies will go. So they call it the best way they can, given their limitations. Sometimes they’re right, as when it’s painfully obvious in 08. And sometimes they miss it, as in 04, 10, or the Wisconsin recall.

My thinking is they don’t really try to predict the outcome, just be able to say they took all the precautions and followed the industry standards. So that we get this fantasy world of polls alongside the real world. And no one will care, because producing them and reporting them are done for their own sake, rather than for telling the future. So long as they’re not so far off should people remember they don’t have an excuse.


141 posted on 09/30/2012 5:09:07 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

I’ve been making that point for weeks now. It’s just the denial phase. I think next will be anger at Romney. Then acceptance we lost.


142 posted on 09/30/2012 5:15:21 AM PDT by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

My Chicago-based, Jewish friend and his Jewish wife, both lifelong Democrats who voted for Obama in 2008, are voting for Romney. Need I say more? Romney is going to win this election.


143 posted on 09/30/2012 5:16:13 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Today the party id is R+4.5 and the turnout will be D+4 with a stronger enthusiasm gap? I don’t think so. Makes no sense.
+++++++++++
I don’t think so either. I do believe that Raz needs to see that R+4.5 either hold or grow through September and October and at that point he will adjust his Turnout Model to be more favorable to our side.

But don’t forget, that R+4.5 is a high water mark for the GOP and it seems unlikely to be sustained through November 6. We don’t have the Rasmussen results for September yet but they should be out next week and I expect they will get a lot of attention here at FR.


144 posted on 09/30/2012 5:23:35 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Like it or not, there are now more parasites than producers. If the parasites vote, even once, the producers lose. 2010, for one reason or another, most of the parasites stayed home. The RINOs made sure that for the most part, no damage was done to the Socialists programs enacted in 2009 and 2010.

In 2012, look for a re-run of 2008 when the parasites, self hating Whites, American haters, brainwashed and stupid youths joined forces to send an imposter to the White House. Come November 2012, look for the same bunch, along with obama's vote counters to keep him there.

145 posted on 09/30/2012 5:59:46 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

“Though I am starting to see more O’Bumbler/Bonehead signs.”

I am struck by the fact that I am NOT seeing Obama signs or bumper stickers in Northern Virginia this time around. Yesterday, I ran errands all around western Fairfax County and eastern Loudoun - the Dulles area. I saw one Obama bumper sticker.

I know many government employees - black and white - who are embarrassed by Obama’s inept performance. Still, they will feel socially ostracized if they voice support for the GOP, or if they criticize Obama. My question is whether they will show up to vote for Obama.

The government union’s big issue is the pay freeze. AFGE is disseminating flyers that don’t mention Obama, but praise Reid and bash Boehner and the Republicans for supporting an extension of the Bush tax cuts. On the theory that increased taxes will get AFGE members the steady raises they are used to from the past. No mention that the Obama took away their raises as a political maneuver because he knows the union will support him regardless of what he does to them. No mention that govt employees did much better financially under Bush than under Obama.


146 posted on 09/30/2012 6:02:29 AM PDT by Belle22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

There is a high level of interest across party lines in this first debate. People want to have their opinions validated. There is a percent of democrat voters, 2% - 5% who are persuadable. Romney’s team knows exactly who those voters are and will target them. If he gets even a portion of those and the majority of undecideds, he will win.


147 posted on 09/30/2012 7:35:12 AM PDT by untwist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Totally agree with what I believe and have been saying for some time as well.

Obama has a lead. It is rather small, and can be overcome, but he currently has a lead. If the election were held today, he would win by a margin similar to GWB back in 2004.

Romney still has time to turn things around though. The public is still deeply unsatisfied with Obama overall, they currently just don’t see Romney as a better alternative.

The debates will tell a lot. The MSM has already written their stories about how Obama dominated the debates and Romney was poorly prepared and made numerous gaffes.

If the American people can get past that spin though and actually listen to what Romney has to offer, and if he can indeed lay out a compelling alternative vision, then he WILL be our next President.

Those are big “ifs”, but it can be done.


148 posted on 09/30/2012 8:15:21 AM PDT by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Good.

Let Obama/Soetoro have it.

There is NO WAY out of 16 Trillion in only the public debt! That and 150 TRILLION in unfunded mandates too!

Think of the passengers on the Titanic voting for a Captain, only difference is one wants to go full speed ahead and the other wants to drop it to half speed.

Obama/Soetoro will be know as the man who crashed the entire US economy and will probably either be arrested, flee offshore or become dictator and I say BRING IT ON!


149 posted on 09/30/2012 8:21:21 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; Jet Jaguar; smoothsailing

*Puff, puff, pant, pant, drool*

“Obama’s ahead! He’s gonna win!! We in the mainly slimy media are just waiting for his giant October Surprise to clench the deal!!! It’s gonna be a doozy!!!!”

*Puff, puff, pant, pant, drool*


150 posted on 09/30/2012 9:31:12 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson