Well, if Warren gets away with it, it just means that you don’t need a license to practice law in Massachusetts. It’s not like lawyers are prudish about it, as long as you can stand in front of a judge and say things in Latin. /sarc
Just get a law degree over the Internet at the same time you get your Medical and Bartending degrees from the University of Aruba, then get admitted to Harvard Law by claiming in writing to be a handicapped, half Zimbabwean and half Poohawk Indian, albino lesbian Maoist communist Wahhabi Muslim. Which is why you can never been seen in public, because of all the assassins from INTERPOL, UNICEF, and Greenpeace.
Anyway, despite their desperate pleas, drop out after a week because they are “Colonialist Zionist Capitalist Oppressors”. They will mail your graduation diploma to your P.O. Box, with an offer of a full professorship, and list you as a faculty member no matter what you do.
Planto vestri own licentia, meditor lex per impunity.
See? We can all do it now!
This is indicative of a far, far deeper issue, and is more representative of the exact type of corrosion liberalism poses to the fabric of this country, especially what we have seen in the last four years.
What happened when the bailouts took place, legal contracts were just tossed aside, especially for the prime investors of GM and Chrysler. The message to anyone who signs a contract was: Your signature on a contract means nothing, unless the government decides in that particular instance that it does.
Here, if everyone looks the other way (as it appears will happen) the message is “You cannot practice law without a license in a given environment unless the situation, which can change at the whim of the government at any time, allows it.”
This does kinda open up the front door and ask the question if anyone really needs a license to practice law. We might as well call it the “Warren door”. We could get rid of law school and all the rest of these fancy school shops, and just let regular people shuffle through the court system.