Posted on 10/01/2012 8:30:23 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
” Media says “yawn.” because they are a apart of it.
Mods ? please move this news story to top breaking news, this news has to get out.
It matches the Libyan Ambassador attack strategy. IMHO, nothing indicates Obama/Hillary didn’t plan the entire event, to justify the UN agenda several days later, by throwing their own Ambassador under the bus, then claiming they were acting reasonably and responsibly.
(Whenever we hear about a world shaking violent event involving about 100 personnel, it strikes me of a preplanned black op, which will have several layers of cover story as a diversion of the intended targeted objective.)
Same tactics used by Hillary over the past 40 years.
(Of course if the Chinese didn’t hack it, but a third party did hack it, the Chinese would know far more about us than we would. Then again, if Obama/Hillary are looking for an excuse to use larger weapons, it might be stage setting for plausible deniablity from the viewpoint of the Chinese.)
I’ve still been wondering why Hillary visited the Cook Islands and Vladivostok during the DNC.
Of course it matters whether there is classified information on an unclassified network.
If there is, then someone screwed up, or did a willful act of espionage.
An unclassified network does have the “gate” open to the outside world, that’s how business is done today.
But to imply, as this blog post does, that nuclear command and control is done on the very same network that is used for email and routine administrative functions is just ludicrous, no matter how many unnamed sources the author cites.
There’s a big, big difference between the “White House Military Office” and a branch of the DOD such as the US Strategic Command (formerly the Strategic Air Command). The office that was hacked is responsible for “military support for White House functions, including food service, Presidential transportation, medical support and emergency medical services, and hospitality services” (quote from Wikipedia).
These are NOT the people who are responsible for the nuclear football, or any aspect of nuclear command and control, and the blog author is irresponsible and factually incorrect to state otherwise.
Minor correction to my last statement. It should read:
“These are NOT the people who are responsible for the nuclear football, or any aspect of nuclear command and control, and the blog author is irresponsible and factually incorrect to say this.”
What does that link have to do with the topic at hand?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.