Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYT Reports That Senators Are Working On A Fiscal Cliff Deal And Paul Krugman Is Already Furious
TBI ^ | 10-2-2012 | Joe Weisenthal

Posted on 10/02/2012 6:47:57 AM PDT by blam

NYT Reports That Senators Are Working On A Fiscal Cliff Deal — And Paul Krugman Is Already Furious

Joe Weisenthal
October 2, 2012, 4:47 AM

Wikimedia Commons

This sounds very hazy, but Jonathan Weisman of the New York Times says work has begun among some Senate leaders will hammer out a plan that would cut $4 trillion out of the deficit over 10 years, and avert the fiscal cliff/sequestration nightmare due to hit on January 1 of next year.

First, senators would come to an agreement on a deficit reduction target — likely to be around $4 trillion over 10 years — to be reached through revenue raised by an overhaul of the tax code, savings from changes to social programs like Medicare and Social Security, and cuts to federal programs. Once the framework is approved, lawmakers would vote on expedited instructions to relevant Congressional committees to draft the details over six months to a year.

If those efforts failed, another plan would take effect, probably a close derivative of the proposal by President Obama’s fiscal commission led by Erskine B. Bowles, the Clinton White House chief of staff, and former Senator Alan K. Simpson of Wyoming, a Republican. Those recommendations included changes to Social Security, broad cuts in federal programs and actions that would lower tax rates over all but eliminate or pare enough deductions and credits to yield as much as $2 trillion in additional revenue.

There are so many hurdles for something like this, including the tax issue, not to mention trying to craft something palatable to the House.

But at least it's worth noting that some form of the 'Grand Bargain' is being kicked around somewhere in Washington.

Meanwhile, Paul Krugman is already flipping out.

(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budget; debt; economy; fiscalcliff

1 posted on 10/02/2012 6:48:10 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
"Fluffy has told me you mustn't do that. YOU MUSTN'T! For if you do, it will make Fluffy angry, and he will DESTROY US ALL!!!"


2 posted on 10/02/2012 6:51:52 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Jim DeMint will not allow this in a lame duck session.


3 posted on 10/02/2012 6:53:25 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Jim DeMint will not allow this in a lame duck session.

Don't be so sure. The calculus has been framed that our National Defense begins shutting down without it.


4 posted on 10/02/2012 6:55:43 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam

The operation of a simple lever is post graduate science to the Krugfool.

Don’t know how he ever got into economics, because math is most certainly not his friend.

As for the Nobel-O-dork committee...it appears that all save for the science awards are now permanently beclowned.


5 posted on 10/02/2012 6:58:59 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Our opponents are not dumb. They are playing several moves ahead. I suspect that they are banking on "Plan B" being required, and that the primary proposal which is being prepared is just a stalking horse for what they want. The primary proposal will (sadly) fail, and then Plan B will really be the only option.

And Plan B will involve a whole lot of tax increases.

This is precisely how they got the major defense cuts that are coming.

6 posted on 10/02/2012 6:59:15 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

bet none suggest stoppoing spending


7 posted on 10/02/2012 6:59:28 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Raise our taxes and the Republican party is dead.


8 posted on 10/02/2012 7:00:44 AM PDT by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

“to be reached through revenue raised by an overhaul of the tax code, savings from changes to social programs like Medicare and Social Security, and cuts to federal programs. Once the framework is approved, lawmakers would vote on expedited instructions to relevant Congressional committees to draft the details over six months to a year”.

I’m sorry, but the first item “revenue raised” is a non starter. Anyone who thinks giving more revenue to the ultimate revenuers who have spent us into oblivion with the revenue they already have access to is an absolute moron, or very wise to the ways of the electorate. How about we just see what can be done with the present level of revenue, or back it up about four years and start there.


9 posted on 10/02/2012 7:01:04 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Cutting $400 bil a year from the budget is like cutting soda from a household budget. Nice try, but it’s only a fraction of a fraction that needs to be cut.

As long as we have an EPA, we’re still spending too much.


10 posted on 10/02/2012 7:01:13 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

A few things bother me here - one, the timing of this ‘plan’, the dearth of details regarding the senators involved, and the source.


11 posted on 10/02/2012 7:01:40 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

He has already said so. At least twice. He said in July that he will do all he can to prevent a lame duck session. He said once the new Congress with a President Romney are in office, things will be ‘fixed’.

That is what *He* said, not me.


12 posted on 10/02/2012 7:02:01 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
13 posted on 10/02/2012 7:02:30 AM PDT by floozy22 (The Bro must GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
you’ve been living under a rock.

Krugman has been lying under the rock

14 posted on 10/02/2012 7:03:45 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Wow! 4 trillion dollars! over 10 years which means only 6 trillion in new debt instead on 10 trillion ...........wow
15 posted on 10/02/2012 7:04:07 AM PDT by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk
As long as we have an EPA, we’re still spending too much.

As long as we have an Education Department, we're still spending too much.

Oh Hell, as long as we have [fill in your favorite bureaucracy], we're still spending too much.

16 posted on 10/02/2012 7:09:38 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam

$4 trillion over 10 years isn’t even back to pre-Obama levels

It is still far too much debt


17 posted on 10/02/2012 7:11:48 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment

exactly


18 posted on 10/02/2012 7:13:23 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
"Wow! 4 trillion dollars! over 10 years which means only 6 trillion in new debt instead on 10 trillion ...........wow "

Wouldn't it allow the can to be kicked down the road a little longer?

19 posted on 10/02/2012 7:13:30 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lurk
As long as we have an EPA, we’re still spending too much.

There was an amusing thread yesterday featuring the "10 worst debate mistakes" -- it went back as far as Gerald Ford and his statement that the USSR did not dominate Eastern Europe.

Well, two of the Top 10 came from Rick Perry. I'm not really picking on Rick, but they were pretty funny. His most amusing was when he tried to name the 3 US Departments that he would certainly eliminate. They were, "Education, Commerce, and ... uh, uh , uh ..." Eventually a bit of chuckling all around ensued. Someone yelled out "EPA?" and Perry laughed out loud and said "EPA! Right!" and then struggled some more but couldn't really complete his point.

At that point, a moderator said, "Just for clarity governor, is EPA the third department?" And Perry laughed again and said, "No, that isn't the one. I'll think of it later."

And right there we see the problem. We need to cut more than just 3 departments, and, yes, EPA is certainly one of them.

20 posted on 10/02/2012 7:14:27 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment

As soon as I hear “over 10 years” I realize it’s BS and start laughing.


21 posted on 10/02/2012 7:16:38 AM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam

I don’t consider sequestration a nightmare.


22 posted on 10/02/2012 7:17:37 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Romney should be ready to say that in a debate. “Why 10 years? Why not now? The voters give you 4 years — they might give me 8 — you’ve had 4, you might get 4 more. What will you do in 4 years? Let’s not talk about 10 years because we both know that that’s just pie-in-the-sky, and the voters deserve the truth.”


23 posted on 10/02/2012 7:18:59 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (ua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Amen. Cut social program like Social Security and Medicare? Really? Medicare may qualify but Social Security is a full-on Ponzi scheme based on fewer eaters and an ever-growing pool of payers. So, they plan on taking the money - or more money - and not paying it back? Good luck, they’re already doing that so not sure where they’d find more to take.

The so-called social program that needs desperate cutting is welfare. Otherwise known as the legal way to buy votes. Until and unless that sacred cow is led to slaughter there will be NO meaningful deficit reduction.

Overhauling the tax code? For God’s sake what do they plan? Adding another 40 million lines of indecipherable mumbo-jumbo? I’m thinking that’s Dem-speak code for vast increase in taxes on the vast majority of taxpayers.

We have run out of other people’s money. Full stop.


24 posted on 10/02/2012 7:24:03 AM PDT by RonInNaples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam

When I was younger I thought Bertrand Russell was the smartest idiot I was familiar with.

Then, for a couple years, I thought it was Krugman.

Now, I’m back to Lord Russell: Krugman’s just a run of the mill idiot.


25 posted on 10/02/2012 7:24:48 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Thought Puzzle: Describe Islam without using the phrase "mental disorder" more than four times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Bingo...tax increases starting immediately, and the “cuts” occur in year 10..


26 posted on 10/02/2012 7:24:52 AM PDT by ken5050 (Laura Ingraham:"If the GOP can't beat Obama in this economy; shut down the party!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Plus, over 10 years? What a scam. Make the maroons think something is actually being done, then shift gears two years out.


27 posted on 10/02/2012 7:24:55 AM PDT by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

That would be nice, but I won’t bet the house on it.

One of the things I despise about politicians is that they all go along with the fiction that they can bind a subsequent Congress to any agreement they make today.


28 posted on 10/02/2012 7:30:24 AM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
Raise our taxes and the Republican party is dead.

The Republican party's been dead for a while. The selection and anointment of Romney, from even before the primaries, is proof of that.
Romney embodies nearly the absence of everything in the Republican Party's stated planks. He's not honest, he implemented socialized healthcare, he signed in a weapons ban, he brought about homosexual marriage [domestic partnerships], he appoints extreme liberal and activist judges, he is pro-abortion [his conversion is, as revealed by actions such as judge appointments, a lie].

29 posted on 10/02/2012 7:32:52 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
...And Paul Krugman Is Already Furious

But is he 'Fast and Furious'?....................

30 posted on 10/02/2012 7:40:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is it just me, or is Hillary! starting to look like Benjamin Franklin?.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

EPA, Dept of Education, Dept of Labor, Dept of Commerce, etc........


31 posted on 10/02/2012 7:42:06 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is it just me, or is Hillary! starting to look like Benjamin Franklin?.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Which one is the really pussy?


32 posted on 10/02/2012 7:43:45 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Which one is the real pussy?


33 posted on 10/02/2012 7:44:00 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: floozy22

Separated at birth?


34 posted on 10/02/2012 7:45:34 AM PDT by rocksblues (Being a Liberal means never having to mean it when you apologize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam
"$4 trillion over 10 years "

I call BS on this!

How many freakin', goldarn times are we going to let these floppy eared losers kick the can down the road?

The savings are in the future, but the spending is now.

35 posted on 10/02/2012 7:55:53 AM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Hmmmm....the good Senators conveniently forget that all ways and means bills must originate in the House. Silly them.


36 posted on 10/02/2012 8:01:36 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
Raise our taxes and the Republican party is dead.

If Romney loses it's dead anyway. The days of Conservatives playing Charlie Brown and the Football with beltway RINOS will be over once and for all.


37 posted on 10/02/2012 8:25:01 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Could you elaborate on this for those of us that are career defense company employees (and chose that career in order to serve their country in that fashion because the military wasn’t open to them?)


38 posted on 10/02/2012 8:47:00 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Aw, “originate” is just one of them words. Who needs words? Pfft.


39 posted on 10/02/2012 8:54:22 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

It’s simple. Not every penny spent on defense actually defends us, nor is wasting money like every other Big Government department serving anything worth serving.


40 posted on 10/02/2012 8:58:57 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Hmmm, not everything is a “waste”....

some of us worked in the factories designing and making things like F-14, F-15, F-18 radars, B-52 infrared sensors, stuff like that.....

and still work in the factory designing and making smaller versions of these.

Been doing this for 33 years, need 10 more to retire


41 posted on 10/02/2012 9:34:42 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: blam

Obama piled $6 Trillion upon us in less than 3 1/2 years......and these guys are talking about a $4 trillion reduction in 10 years!!!

This doesn’t make a lick of fiscal/financial sense to me.


42 posted on 10/02/2012 10:51:57 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The public always gets rolled by each DC crisis du jure. If a “deal” is in the making, it is just a way to put a pretty face on BOHICA.


43 posted on 10/02/2012 10:55:56 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson