Skip to comments.Mounting Evidence For Econcomic Recession 2013
Posted on 10/03/2012 2:39:00 PM PDT by blam
Mounting Evidence For Econcomic Recession 2013
Economics / Recession 2013Oct 03, 2012 - 07:43 AM
By: Money Morning
David Zeiler writes: Don't worry about scanning headlines every day to determine the U.S. economy's chances of entering a recession in 2013.
We already know the answer.
Such indicators as gross domestic product (GDP), consumer spending, durable goods and exports all point to an economy not in a slow recovery, but on the verge of a 2013 recession.
That's because the trend lines, rather than showing gradual improvement, are moving in the opposite direction. The economy, after spending months with its head just barely above water, is about to go under.
The U.S. Commerce Department last week revised second quarter GDP sharply downward from 1.7% to 1.25%. The GDP was 1.9% in the first quarter of 2012. While we do not yet have any official data for the current quarter, a Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia survey of forecasters in August put the number at 1.6%.
That's an ominous pattern.
James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute explains: "Research from the Fed finds that since 1947, when two-quarter annualized real GDP growth falls below 2%, recession follows within a year 48% of the time. And when year-over-year real GDP growth falls below 2%, recession follows within a year 70% of the time."
The Mounting Evidence for Recession 2013
There's actually a term for what we're experiencing: the "stall-speed economy." It's roughly defined as a period of two or more quarters in which the GDP remains mired below 2%.
And the headline GDP numbers only tell part of the story. All too many economic indicators are flashing a warning that growth will slow down even more.
Here are three pieces of the GDP that show how the economy is getting slammed from several directions:
Durable Goods Orders plunged 13.2% in August, the worst one-month drop since January 2009. The drop keeps this statistic on a trajectory that echoes previous recessions. Durable Goods indicates the health of the manufacturing sector.
Consumer Spending was up $500 million in the second quarter, but that number was revised downward 90% from the previous Q2 estimate. Consumer spending makes up about 70% of the GDP.
Exports decreased $300 million in the second quarter, a 110% decrease from the previous Q2 estimate. That's bad for U.S. corporations, which rely on exports for more than one-third of their profits.
In addition to the GDP data, there's plenty of other evidence pointing to a 2013 recession:
The Philly Fed's Survey of Coincident Indicators, a mix of state-level wage and employment data, has dropped to +24 from +80 just three months ago. This indicator has averaged +41 in the three months preceding each of the past five recessions. The latest drop puts this indicator into recession territory.
Earnings warnings from corporations have been on the rise since mid-summer. Most recently, key companies like FedEx Corp. (NYSE: FDX), Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) and Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE: CAT) have issued warnings. The ratio negative outlooks versus positive is 4.3-to-1, the most bearish since Q3 of 2001.
The Dow Jones Transportation Index has fallen 5.88% in the past three months, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average has risen 5.19%. Railroad and trucking companies have been reporting lower shipping volumes in recent months another sign of slowing economic activity.
QE3, or QE Infinity, the Federal Reserve's latest plan to pump billions of dollars of new liquidity into the country's financial system, was hailed as a positive for the stock market. But the Fed would only take such an extraordinary measure if it anticipates a lot of economic ugliness ahead.
Even if such a tottering economy isn't quite weak enough to tip over on its own, all it takes is a little push from an external shock, such as the Eurozone debt crisis.
While recession 2013 may be inevitable, investors do have options and time to protect themselves.
Gross Domestic Product / St. Louis Adjusted Monetary Base or Aggregate Monetary Velocity
we look like a turd world country.
IIRC, GDP also includes government spending. A not insignificant portion of government spending comes from QE dollars, yes?
If so, I wonder how much of the 1.25% revised “growth” is from the funny money printing press and outside of tax revenue and borrowed funds.
FDR’s policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate
Obama loves FDR’s moves. He’s doing them again. FDR was a miserable failure, Obama is too.
“We found that a relapse isn’t likely unless lawmakers gum up a recovery with ill-conceived stimulus policies.” Obama loves stimulus policies, especially ill conceived ones.
The only surprise to brain dead Americans should be that FDR was a liberal fool, Obama is a lying traitor trying to destroy the country.
No, actually we look like Japan.
Those monetary velocity graphs tell most of the story. We’re in a liquidity trap, the Fed created it, and they won’t admit that a) we’re in one, b) none of their QE plans are going to do anything about it, other than make it worse.
We have a third grade, third world president who made it all possible in his drive to marginalize America. Just wait for his second term bitch for Bush! Whoever takes it on is going to have huge problems.
Obama? Has planted his seeds for destruction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.