Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: THU: 10/04: O: 49% R:47%: All numbers PRE-Debate. Obama -11
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 10/04/2012 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 10/04/2012 7:23:46 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer

Thursday, October 04, 2012

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows President Obama attracting support from 49% of voters nationwide, while Mitt Romney earns the vote from 47%. One percent (1%) prefers some other candidate, and three percent (3%) are undecided. See daily tracking history.

It is important to note, however, that most of the interviews for this survey were conducted before last night’s first presidential debate between Obama and Romney. The daily Presidential Trackng Poll is based on telephone interviews of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012debates; 2012polls; election; obama; rasmussen; romney
Keep in mind that ALL the data in this poll is PRE-debate.

Tomorrow's poll will have the first post debate sample in it and Sunday's poll will have the FULL post debate sample, although it will include both Friday and Saturday, which are not good Republican polling days

1 posted on 10/04/2012 7:23:50 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Not only that, but keep in mind that Ras has admitted his new polling numbers showing O consistently UP, are with a D+5 sampling model. He said he did that because he kept getting more self ID’d rats than in earlier polls. Even before this, he was using a D+ model, albeit far less in number than polls showing O way ahead. If Ras only would go back to his previous sampling model, his pre-debate numbers would essentially have the race a dead heat within the margin of error.


2 posted on 10/04/2012 7:29:17 AM PDT by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
include both Friday and Saturday, which are not good Republican polling days.

LOL. That's funny. And how do you explain Romney losing 2 points on Wednesday?

3 posted on 10/04/2012 7:31:40 AM PDT by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

His pre-debate numbers ARE a dead heat. 49 to 47 is within the margin of error

But point taken on his high D+ samples.


4 posted on 10/04/2012 7:32:31 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: paul544

Paul,

Romney can have a bad day ANY DAY of the week.

However, for the past 8 years that I have followed Ras (and other pollsters) Republicans have “bad” weekends.

So, the trend is what I am talking about

Cheers!


5 posted on 10/04/2012 7:34:12 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
10,000 polls in this election cycle are about 9,995 too many.

We need to do the work and forget all this "modeling" garbage.

Yesterday I contacted six people about voting. Today's goal is the same. That's how we'll win.

6 posted on 10/04/2012 7:38:02 AM PDT by The Citizen Soldier (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everyone stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
All numbers PRE-Debate

What debate?

7 posted on 10/04/2012 7:39:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (bOTRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Sounds like the basic modeling system they all use is broken.


8 posted on 10/04/2012 7:40:41 AM PDT by varmintman (November Sixth || Obunga is Through || Bork Obunga || Before He Borks You || Burma Shave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Tomorrow will have some west coast post debate stuff in it. Saturday will have the numbers from today rolled in, and Tuesday will have three full days worked in.

But, based on the online stuff I am reading, the Dems would be better off having the Ryan/Biden debate after the next Presidential one. Obama got whacked, Biden is going to look like a fool, and Obama will have to deal with both going into round 2.

Mitt needed to hit it big, and he did.

It was Obama’s twentieth anniversary last night. In his mind he was confident he was going to get “it” by the end of the day. My bet is he did not think Mitt was the one to give him it.

Good thing Reggie Love wasn’t around. Methinks he would have gotten roughed up last night. Yeah...he walked into a doorknob.


9 posted on 10/04/2012 7:41:44 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

You sure? D+5? I dont fault Rasmussen, because he is honest about his poll breakdowns. If D+5 is the case (and this is the first I ever heard of that), then I feel relieved.


10 posted on 10/04/2012 8:03:00 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette; All

I thought it was D+3.

When does Ras announce new partisan ID data?

The latest we have is from Sept. 1 for August, which by now is eons ago.


11 posted on 10/04/2012 8:10:59 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

We should not just assume Ryan will come out on top, though I think that likely. But, Biden tends to not have his gaffe moments in debates.


12 posted on 10/04/2012 8:13:14 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Ryan need only stick with the game plan executed perfectly by Romney last night: stick to the facts, hammer on the issues, and be forcefully confident yet polite. The enemy cannot win based on the facts on the ground alone, so stick to the salient issues hurting the country and the principles we must preserve. I cannot imagine a scenario where Paul Ryan (who is even more fluent in the issues than Mitt) loses.


13 posted on 10/04/2012 8:17:59 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer

Just wait until the electorate witnesses Joe Biden bringing sexy back to the dem party in next week’s debate against Paul Ryan. LOL!!!


14 posted on 10/04/2012 8:22:57 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftwareEngineer
Umm, all numbers are not pre-debate.

It is important to note, however, that most of the interviews for this survey were conducted before last night’s first presidential debate between Obama and Romney.

Most numbers, yes. All numbers, no.

15 posted on 10/04/2012 8:27:22 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Ras is a 3-day roll. So if only, say, 20% of the polling from last night came post-debate, then only 6.67% of the total 3 day rolling poll is post-debate. Not enough to move the poll, certainly, in any significant manner.


16 posted on 10/04/2012 8:30:20 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Point taken. Thank you!


17 posted on 10/04/2012 8:37:34 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

Same kind of groupthink that gave us “Anthropogenic Global Warming”.


18 posted on 10/04/2012 10:20:56 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: paul544

Somebody needs to keep a list of these lefty discouragement trolls who have nothing better to do than try to deflate conservatives here.

This guy, someone named chopper something. All you have to do is look at their posts - unlike their president they’ve VERY transparent.

Hank


19 posted on 10/04/2012 10:23:28 PM PDT by County Agent Hank Kimball (Myth Romney is a vile Fabian Socialist - his opponent is infinitely worse. How did it come to this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson