Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worried about China gaining a competitive edge in the green-energy market? Donít be.
Hotair ^ | 10/05/2012 | Erika Johnsen

Posted on 10/05/2012 8:02:37 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

News flash: Compared to free enterprise, central planning is a reliably inefficient, costly, and ill-fated way to allocate resources.

Just kidding, totally not a news flash. It's just good ol' fashioned common sense --- leastaways, you'd think it would be common sense, given that historical examples abound, except that President Obama doesn’t quite seem to get it. Whenever he goes into touting-his-green-energy-"investments" mode, he is constantly suggesting that not only is China gaining an advantage over us in the clean-energy market of the future (how he presumes to know that "wind and solar are the future" is still a mystery to me, seeing as how consumers have yet to voluntarily cotton on to these technologies), but that we should follow suit and adopt some of the same central-planning measures China does in order to keep up with their supposedly burgeoning market --- and it's akin to the deaf willfully following the blind. Via the NYT:

China in recent years established global dominance in renewable energy, its solar panel and wind turbine factories forcing many foreign rivals out of business and its policy makers hailed by environmentalists around the world as visionaries.

But now China’s strategy is in disarray. Though worldwide demand for solar panels and wind turbines has grown rapidly over the last five years, China’s manufacturing capacity has soared even faster, creating enormous oversupply and a ferocious price war.

The result is a looming financial disaster, not only for manufacturers but for state-owned banks that financed factories with approximately $18 billion in low-rate loans and for municipal and provincial governments that provided loan guarantees and sold manufacturers valuable land at deeply discounted prices.

China’s biggest solar panel makers are suffering losses of up to $1 for every $3 of sales this year, as panel prices have fallen by three-fourths since 2008. Even though the cost of solar power has fallen, it still remains triple the price of coal-generated power in China, requiring substantial subsidies through a tax imposed on industrial users of electricity to cover the higher cost of renewable energy.

Nutshell version: The Chinese government provided subsidies and other incentives that messed with market signals, creating a massive oversupply that means China’s green-energy market is in a whole heap of financial trouble. And President Obama’s grand scheme for catching up to China’s artificially jacked up green-energy market is to… follow up with more of the exact same central-planning crapola? Well, doesn’t that sound awesome.

I am most definitely worried about America’s green-energy market in and of itself, but not because of competition from China (and even if they were winning the green-energy race, so what? It’s called free trade). With the Obama administration encouraging rent-seeking and diverting resources into the technologies that they’ve deemed to be future winners (which must, by definition, be actual losers, since the private market isn’t choosing to do much investing in them of their own free profit-seeking will), I’m worried that other technological and investment opportunities that could actually be economically viable may be falling by the wayside while we’re off an wild green goose chase. I’m worried that we’re quixotically killing off energy-market innovation through our own political hubris, the results of which we can already see magnified in China’s policy decisions.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; greenenergy

1 posted on 10/05/2012 8:02:47 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would China engage in something that is not cost-effective? Only WE do that, right SOLYNDRA?


2 posted on 10/05/2012 8:04:46 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Chinese are too busy painting all their stuff with delicious lead paint.


3 posted on 10/05/2012 8:07:15 PM PDT by Edward Teach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama and the real Maoists can continue to fund these losers but the fact remains they aren’t free market viable.

They are fake products in a fake market.


4 posted on 10/05/2012 8:23:48 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course. What we’re not often told, is that PV modules from China were one of the few imports outlawed.


5 posted on 10/05/2012 8:36:55 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
China’s biggest solar panel makers are suffering losses of up to $1 for every $3 of sales this year, as panel prices have fallen by three-fourths since 2008. Even though the cost of solar power has fallen, it still remains triple the price of coal-generated power in China, requiring substantial subsidies through a tax imposed on industrial users of electricity to cover the higher cost of renewable energy.

Not only that, but the pollution from coal there will block out the sun, rendering solar panels useless.

6 posted on 10/05/2012 9:39:12 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson