Skip to comments.Debating Liberty (Saturbray)
Posted on 10/06/2012 9:26:04 AM PDT by bray
From Attalia they sailed back to Antioch, where they had been committed to the grace of God for the Work they had now completed. Acts 14:26
Since it is universal knowledge now Romney destroyed Obama we are now down to the question of what category is the tsunami heading for the District of Corruption going to be. After the night was over so was the Obozo façade and now the bold prediction of another Landslide is turning into a reality. There is even a good chance Oregon is about to turn Red as record Dems are turning away from the Communists Party and either switching or putting Republican signs up.
The analysis of the debate has been pretty superficial about the problem their messiah has with this format, the facts do not match the persona we were sold. Communism just isnt a real answer to any problem and is never chosen by people except when the choices are it or a firing squad. That is what Obozo was trying to sell and what the country now knows is an inferior product. As bad as he was in the debate he is the perfect spokesman for communism since he has been indoctrinated on it from the time he was born and groomed his entire life.
Obamas grandparents were both communists from the 60s being run out of Kansas and moving to Hawaii to foment their hatred of America and capitalism in a little enclave of fellow commies on the islands. Even though Granny made a small fortune as vice president of a bank as a commie in a capitalist world her husband stayed true to the faith most likely believing the CIA was lying about all the killing fields in China and Russia. Barry then went to the heart of communism in America in the University system arriving at the Mecca of anti-Americanism, Harvard. There he studied racial law where he found all of the Black racists whose basis was Islam and Black Liberation theology. Liberation theology is pure communism where a Black dictator decides how to divide Whiteys money. Here he received all of the intensive brainwashing he needed to understand the cult and how it would take over America to punish Whitey and Jews for their crimes against Blacks and Indians.
Finally, he ended up in the communist dictatorship of Chicago. With his commie connections he quickly found the center of the absolutely corrupt Daley Machine enjoying the fruits of that corruption. He worked closely with many factions of the communist underground in Chicago which formed from Marshal Davis, Oscar Brown, and Vernon Jarrett graduating to Bill Ayers and well connected Valarie Jarrett. These were all avowed communists permeated the Chicago establishment and gave him the final education he needed to carry forward the clichés and worker (middle class) phraseology needed to humiliate and vilify those in power using the Alinsky model. Their vilifying and mocking of anybody putting forward American values has been their hallmark which is how they acquire power by manipulating the voters into giving up their freedom to these so called intellectuals.
His Hope and Change campaign was the pinnacle of their manipulation campaign as they sent a fresh new Black man who espoused all of their clichés. With the absolute devotion from the three pinnacles of power, Media, Academia and the Communists Party they were able to convince America they had all the answers to Americas problems with redistribution of wealth and the elimination of poverty. Problem is the system does not work as you have to steal the money from the producers who really would rather hold onto what they earned a concept foreign to communists who have never earned a single dollar on their own. Most acquire it from being involved in a corrupt Inner Circle like Michelle Obamas fake job at the University Hospital which multi-millionaire slumlord Valarie Jarrett gave her for $300K.
Now we have seen the results of communist rule in America and it isnt a pretty sight which is what Obama had to try to defend in the debate. He couldnt tell the truth so he came prepared with his rehearsed clichés and catch phrases to paint Romney as an evil capitalist everyone should be afraid of. He was trying to put lightning back in the bottle as the new kid on the block and bringing more Hope and Change to save America from itself. The Three Pillars believed it would work since they had just spent $300 Million brainwashing voters to believe this evil rich villain they had invented of what a wealthy capitalist looks like and he believed he only had to throw more tomatoes at Romney so everyone would adore him.
A funny thing happened on the way to the debate, Conservatism showed up. Millions of prayers and the Tea Party philosophy were articulated in ninety minutes. Sure he threw in his Romneycare, but even when he did he mentioned the 10th Amendment which says States have control of their major decisions and that is how we move forward on economic issues. America is really a country of little countries if it is organized correctly so you can find what works and copy that as a country. Romney is the most articulate candidate we have had in decades and nobody saw that coming. There were flashes of absolute brilliance as he explained what our Constitution stands for which is a limited gummit and the protection of freedom and a persons right to keep what he earns.
As surprised as America was to see the real Mitt Romney there was nobody as surprised as Barack Obama who for the first time in his life someone was saying no to him and here is why. This is likely the first time in his life anybody has told him that and he did not know how to react while having to explain a political system which enslaves everyone.
Next debate he has to look forward to repeating clichés like, Osama is Dead and GM is Alive, I wish my Ambassador was. America is going to watch in record numbers to see if he can make a comeback or was his articulation skills as phony as those Styrofoam pillars? To explain his foreign policy is simple, America is the largest criminal in history and we need to give everything back to those they have stolen from. He cant say that so we are going to see Round Two of a major beat down as he stumbles to one of the largest defeats in histoir.
This was not Romney being great or Obama being terrible, it was about America and our Founders calling Americans back to their roots against communist tyranny and America hearing their echo. This was about Freedom vs Tyranny and Romney reminding Americans what Freedom looks like and there is a path back to it, he is the first step. This was about someone carrying the truth and articulating it unashamed so all of those Americans who have been beaten down could be proud of who and what they are, hearing that message. This was about America being given the permission to be proud of their great heritage and spanking down those who say we should be as ashamed of our country as they are. In November we are going to see a giant wave of Americans who heard that message and are willing to take that first difficult step back towards Liberty. After the debate there was a lady in the middle of NY harbor who was smiling a little bit more.
Pray for America
Don’t let Elsi or the Torie Nana read this.
On another thread today, an article writer mentions the so-called "progressives'" hailing of their 2008 as a "messiah."
May I share my post there on this thread also?
Left to his own "wits," armed only with flashing a toothy smile which, when implemented at inappropriate times, reveals its own disconnection from the topic and moment, he uncloaked himself before the world.
With that said, the writer's placing of the name of the Messiah and the caricature of "a messiah" presented by this puppet of the forces of "progressivism" in the same article, though intended to differentiate between, is a little troubling.
The first spoke with authority, as "the Word made flesh."
The second uses a voice, a speaking style, and an acquired ability to "act" before audiences, with the help of prompters and teleprompters, to sound authoritative.
There is no comparison, nor should there be.
One came to reveal the Source of individual life, rights, liberty and a way to pursue happiness in keeping with Creator's law.
Others throughout history have come to entice individuals to forsake individual liberty and their unalienable rights in order to serve them and those who send them.
Would suggest to any who wish an authentic history of the ideas underlying America's founding a visit to this web site, at which Richard Frothingham's outstanding 1872 "History of the Rise of the Republic of the United States" can be read on line.
This 600+-page history traces the ideas which gave birth to the American founding. Throughout, Richard Frothingham, the historian, develops the idea that it is "the Christian idea of man" which allowed the philosophy underlying the Declaration of Independence and Constitution to become a reality--an idea which recognizes the individual and the Source of his/her "Creator"-endowed life, liberty and law.
Is there any wonder that the enemies of freedom, the so-called "progressives," do not promote such authentic histories of America? Their philosophy puts something called "the state," or "global interests" as being superior to individuals and requires a political elitist group to decide what role individuals are to play.
In other words, they must turn the Founders' ideas upside-down in order to achieve a common mediocrity for individuals and power for themselves.
So, the still-revolutionary idea stated by both Ryan and Romney about the Source of our rights became fodder for the current President's disdain recently, when he declared that they were "reruns" from the 20th Century and better suited for "black and white" television. (Actually, Mr. President, they are from a time much earlier than that.)
As Jefferson wisely observed:
"History, by apprising the people of the past, will enable them to judge of the future; it will avail them of the experience of other times and other nations; it will qualify them as judges of the actions and designs of men; it will enable them to know ambition under every disguise it may assume; and knowing it, to defeat its views."
All of which reinforces our conviction that the ideas of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution are as revolutionary and objectionable to tyrants as they were in 1776 and 1787!
Not so long ago there was a vogue for mission statements. A mission statement is a bumper-sticker length statement of what your organization is about. All businesses are about getting paid, of course - but the mission statement of a company must be about the customer. If you are a hot dog vendor, your mission is to deliver hot dogs when and where the customer will enjoy having one, and deliver the hot dog hot and the bun fresh. Something like that.The same thing applies to government. The mission statement of the federal government is the preamble to the Constitution - or, on grounds of length, the penultimate clause thereof:
secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our PosterityIMHO the economic policy of the government must, in our straited circumstances, must be to promote the credit-worthiness of the governments, and of the people.When money doesnt grow on trees, the government must budget and prioritize prudently. We cant afford renewable energy when fracking can provide our needs at less than a quarter of the cost. We cant afford to put politicians - or, what is much the same, union bosses - in charge of automobile manufacturers. Or even - you didnt build that - small businesses. We cant afford to assign control of businesses to big thinkers who wont attend to the details which in fact make the difference between valuable and fruitless endeavors.
Benefits of freedom:
1) freedom is the foundation of both personal safety and personal security and safety which are necessary for personal well being and self-preservation.
2) freedom is the foundation of peace
3) freedom makes it possible for an individual to be able to act on their own rational judgment and to be motivated to do what is in their own true interests. 4) freedom makes it possible for an individual to be able to benefit from the rational judgments, choices, and actions of others with whom they deal
5) freedom makes it possible to be motivated by the use and disposal of private property
6) freedom is the foundation of laissez-faire capitalism
Bray for America