Posted on 10/06/2012 1:31:47 PM PDT by presidio9
If Washington, DC, is a city of poorly guarded secrets, perhaps the least well guarded is Senator John Kerry’s desire to be secretary of state. Hillary Clinton has made it clear that she will not return for a second term in that role, and if President Obama is reelected, Kerry would certainly be a favorite for the post. From his emergency diplomatic relations with Afghanistan to his work chairing the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Kerry has been one of Obama’s go-to guys for international affairs. Considering that our senior senator was among the first high-profile politicians to support Obama’s presidential bid, you could even say that the president owes him one.
So what, short of a Mitt Romney victory this November, could thwart Kerry’s ambitions? An Elizabeth Warren victory.
With control of the Senate so tightly contested between the two parties, Warren’s race with Senator Scott Brown could well decide whether the D’s or the R’s hold the majority. So suppose Warren beats Brown in a tight vote. Also suppose that Obama wins reelection, and Kerry is given the keys to the State Department.
That would mean Massachusetts would need a new senator, of course, so just like when Ted Kennedy passed away, Governor Deval Patrick would appoint a temporary one immediately, then hold a special election in 145 to 160 days. It’s not hard to imagine Brown running for Kerry’s seat. It is hard to imagine who’d run against him on the Democratic ticket, especially since the Dems will soon need a gubernatorial candidate as well.
“Where are the Democrats going to find a credible candidate for governor and a credible candidate for Senate if Kerry is successful?” wonders Philip Johnston, a former Massachusetts Democratic Party chairman. With Patrick’s term up in two years, Johnston points out, candidates like the rejuvenated Attorney General Martha Coakley or state Treasurer Steve Grossman might choose to hold off on a Senate bid and instead run for governor (besides, we’ve already seen how Coakley versus Brown plays out).
You could trot out all the names we’ve already heard: City Year cofounder Alan Khazei, Newton Mayor Setti Warren, Celtics co-owner Steve Pagliuca, our various representatives in the House, but none of them inspires much confidence against a candidate as tough as Brown. “I think there is a bench issue right now for the Democrats,” Johnston says.
It could well be that if Obama wins again and taps Kerry for his cabinet, he’d be handing a crucial Senate seat back to the GOP. That doesn’t seem like something the president would want to do. So while we’d like to think we know who Kerry will be voting for in this November’s Senate race, one of his colleagues might just want to check his ballot.
This FRAUD won’t have to worry about that position anyway after November. In the unlikely event THE FOREIGNER cheats his way into a second term we would be better off having NOBODY fill the shoes of the disaster HILLARY.
These people do not live in Realville.
If you will remember, Caroline’s brief candidacy in NY collapsed into a bowl of quivering stupidity, from which she will never recover.
Isn't she, you know, the daughter of, you know, a former, you know, president or something?
When Ted Kennedy was on his deathbed, they freaked out over the loss of a supermajority in the senate. Now the Governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election.
Based on their record with the Kennedys, including unrelated politicians who legally changed their name to Kennedy and won their race, I betting on the Massachsettes electorate's willingness to overlook quivering stupidity. They are about to elect a senator who willfully falsified her own racial history for professional gain for decades.
I thought Caroline's problem was her residency, but it turns out she inherited a huge land holding on Martha's Vineyard, so I have no doubt that some court will recognize that as her primary residence if it comes to that.
"When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct."
It doesn't say how soon the election must be held. What they did in 2004 was to provide that Romney would not be able to make a temporary appointment of a Republican if Kerry won the Presidential race; then when Teddy died they changed it so that the Democratic governor could appoint a Democrat for the interval until the election (essential if the Senate was to have a filibuster-proof majority).
They changed the rule when Kerry was running for President because the Gov would have appointed a Reublican.
My Gawd how pathetic. John Kerry for Hillary Clinton - it's hard to believe but it would be a step lower.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.