Reporting for under the bus doody, Commander B'rock!
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 10/06/2012 8:56:02 PM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 10/06/2012 6:40:26 PM PDT by Justaham
The Obama campaign has been reeling since losing the first Presidential debate of this election cycle in front of 67 million viewers. They've tried--and thus far failed--to craft a narrative to explain away the debacle in Denver. Previously, we reported to you that Obama Senior Advisor David Plouffe, who ran the President's successful 2008 campaign, (falsely) accused Mitt Romney of lying. In a rare comedic moment from the typically robotic former Vice President Al Gore, he suggested on Current TV that the Mile High City's altitude was the reason Obama was low on energy and enthusiasm. Neither of those caught on with the mainstream pro-Obama media.
Now the Obama Administration is floating their latest excuse: that the campaign, particularly Romney stand-in John Kerry, did not channel Mitt's aggression enough.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Princess Leia with an M-16. *sigh*. But not as good as Princess Leia with an M-16 while wearing a gold bikini ...
Reporting for under the bus doody, Commander B'rock!
Who would you say is a democrat version of Romney?
And yet another excuse to add to your list.
Viscous?
40 weight, 50 weight?
She looks like a young boy with crooked legs.
Wait a minnit! Are the Obama people swift boating a decorated Vietnam vet? I am outraged! Where is larry O’Donnell on this?
Let them keep blaming everyone else and deny the reality that their candidate is an empty chair.
Maybe they’ll finally wake up to the truth on Nov. 7 when they have to face the reality that they have been defeated. But probably not, they’ll still be assigning blame to everything and everyone except the one to whom the blame squarely belongs. They can’t fix the problem if they refuse to face what it is, and that’s a good thing.
Most grown men would simply say, “I had a bad night. I’ll do better next time.”
But not a single one of Barry’s entourage has pursued the `man-up’ option.
I think a couple million guys would disagree with that.
In other words, Obama was for Kerry before he was against him.
Viscous?
40 weight, 50 weight?
::::::::::::::
that’s vicious. :-) (even though we are dealing with some very slippery people....)
Ha, isn’t that Coneheads?
the messiah selected the wrong person to help him.
a messiah shouldn’t need help.
a messiah should make better choices.
guess he ain’t much of a messiah.
need to look for another.
blessings, bobo
Hubby was up in the middle of the night, unable to sleep, and was watching some horror flick. The female was wearing that exact costume but they had spray painted it silver.
The problem is that no Democrat politician has the guts to challenge Obama on anything. They know what a petty and spiteful person he is. And because of that, they are afraid to make him look bad ever, even when prepping for a debate. Obama has been surrounded by a bunch of yes-men and yes-women for the past four years. He demands nothing less. And for Kerry, he did exactly what he was supposed to do, because his role in the debate prep was to lose. Kerry practiced losing to Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.