Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

August: Obama's State Dept Pulled Security Teams Out of Libya
Breitbart ^ | Oct 7,2012 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 10/07/2012 9:40:00 AM PDT by blueyon

A "Site Security Team" member claims he and his team were pulled out of Libya in August despite the fact that U.S. officials in Libya wanted more security.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ambassadorstevens; andywood; august2012; criminal; greenberet; libya; obama; security; setup; specialforces; statedepartment; statedept; woods
I have very few words to this story...Criminal! Vote Obama and company out Nov. 2012, he can not handle the job!
1 posted on 10/07/2012 9:40:15 AM PDT by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Wag the dog gone wrong.


2 posted on 10/07/2012 9:42:38 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; bgill; STARWISE; onyx; maggief; SE Mom; penelopesire
Shiite is about to hit the ..... man!
3 posted on 10/07/2012 9:47:03 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

You just look at the timing of this (Aug), and wonder who knew what was going on, and told interested parties what was going to occur?


4 posted on 10/07/2012 9:47:27 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

What a cabal of amateurs (or thugs) we have in charge of the country.


5 posted on 10/07/2012 9:49:02 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

They were more worried about perception than reality....as usual.


6 posted on 10/07/2012 9:59:35 AM PDT by Aria ( 2008 wasn't an election - it was a coup d'etat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

It’s the “ Chicago Way “ of thuggery ; we know why “the movie “ was the State Departments mantra ... fabricate a response while we develope a ‘plausable story’ .

Ten days of lies to the American people ; 23 days to get the FBI investigators into the country .
Sure we trust the administration to protect our assets ( ie.: missles and auto-matic weapons supplied to the Arab democracies) .
There is no cover-up here !! /sar


7 posted on 10/07/2012 10:03:04 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

It’s the “ Chicago Way “ of thuggery ; we know why “the movie “ was the State Departments mantra ... fabricate a response while we develop a ‘plausible story’ .

What on earth is going to happen when (I think) National Geographic airs the Obama killed bin laden on Nov 3th??????????????


8 posted on 10/07/2012 10:13:00 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bgill
This is Nick Berg II.

In 2004 they didn't intend for Nick Berg to be killed he was just supposed to make the video.

This time they didn't intend for the Ambassador to be killed they intended for him to be taken hostage, then blame Romney and the republicans of collaborating with the terrorist to make Obama look like Carter.

In Hillary's statement she contradicts herself. While she is claiming it was spontaneous because of the video, she is also implying it was planned by someone to hurt the Obama Administration.

The “journal” found by CNN is just a tad bit too convenient. Reminds me of the revolver found in Vince Fosters hand.

9 posted on 10/07/2012 10:17:41 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I’ve suspected from the very start that the administration’s and State Department’s odd explanations have been due to their being responsible for the deaths of four Americans.


10 posted on 10/07/2012 10:22:11 AM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
This time they didn't intend for the Ambassador to be killed they intended for him to be taken hostage, then blame Romney and the republicans of collaborating with the terrorist to make Obama look like Carter.

Your theory makes no sense. If he had been taken hostage much of America would have looked at Obama as Carter without any connection or blow-back to Romney.

11 posted on 10/07/2012 10:22:29 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Hillary is going to get another pass isn’t she? Untouchable Hillary is the rule and ALL are endlessly abiding by it, on both sides of the aisle.

Hillary likely led and encouraged all of this, or she would have resigned quite some time ago. After all, she IS the smartest woman in every room (with food) everywhere.


12 posted on 10/07/2012 10:22:58 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

blueyon ~ “ What on earth is going to happen when (I think) National Geographic airs the Obama killed bin laden on Nov 3th?????????????? “

It will take AL Jezerra a day to make copies , another 2 days for distribution to the 5,500 mile long “Arab Crescent” TV stations ( Morroco - Indonesia ) .
The only time the Muzzies are not fighting each other is when they are otherwise entertained , or already fighting “ The Great Satan “ .
I think we will see some kind of demonstration right on election day (11/6/2012 ) if we aren’t already involved in a Syrian war to spread the caliphate .


13 posted on 10/07/2012 10:23:38 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Wag the dog gone wrong.

That is a real possibility. But I can't figure out how it could have gone right. Any ideas?

14 posted on 10/07/2012 10:30:13 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

My fear was always that Obama was going to hand a few platoons, or more, to our enemies somehow. I forgot about our embassies...


15 posted on 10/07/2012 10:32:07 AM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

There was always something fishy about Berg, his wacky father and 9/11. It never made any sense and certainly wasn’t just happenstance.


16 posted on 10/07/2012 10:32:25 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

RitaOK ~ “ Hillary is going to get another pass isn’t she? Untouchable Hillary is the rule and ALL are endlessly abiding by it, on both sides of the aisle. “

Hillary won’t just skate through this ; there will be repercussions.

While the media may have re-built the reputation of Slick Willy (who also bold-faced lied directly to the American people on TV ), not so with Hillary .
Neither of the Clintons have a reputation for honesty .
In hindsight , I believe Rice was the collateral damage , and ‘sacrificial lamb’ in an attempt to salvage Hillary’s reputation for future political consideration.
However , I believe that Libyia was too public a condemnation of State Dept. security malfeasance and ineptness to be quickly forgotten.
In a word , there are too many bodies to ignore.


17 posted on 10/07/2012 10:39:54 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Do you know where the term “October Surprise” came from?

They do not want Obama reelected. If he is reelected the economy is going to crash, probably will anyway, and they do not want a dem in the WH when it does. After 4 years of saying the economy is going great guns because of Obama’s policies, when it crashes there is no one to blame but Obama.

They want to be able to make the claim the economy crashed because Romney undid Obama's policies and returned us to the “Bush Years” and the policies that caused the recession in the first place.

Having him held hostage and released on the day Romney is sworn in is basically the same as Hillary holding up a newspaper saying “Bush Knew”. You have the entire 9/11 “TRUTHER” brigade back to launch Hillary into the WH in 2016.

It will also provide cover for their foreign policy failures

18 posted on 10/07/2012 10:48:06 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bgill
With Berg I believe the intent was to make it appear as if Kerry supporters and possibly even Kerry himself were collaborating with the terrorist so that he would be forced out and Hillary take his place at the last minute.

I think you will find the same thing with Obama. I don't think they ever intended for him to be in the WH.

I think the idea was to take Obama right to the edge then have him declared ineligible to be president and Hillary take his place.

One of the main reasons I believe this is the group that called themselves Journ-O-list(SP?).

They formed that group in February of 2007 allegedly to get Obama elected, but the same journalist were carrying Hilly's water for her dirty tricks campaign until April 2007 when it was derailed by the VT shooting bumping it from the news and it never recovered it's momentum.

19 posted on 10/07/2012 11:05:11 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

One can only imagine what the media would be doing if this happened on Bush’s watch. It would be the entire first half of every evening news broadcast.


20 posted on 10/07/2012 11:06:02 AM PDT by Hugin ("Most times a man'll tell you his bad intentions, if you listen and let yourself hear."---Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt
...salvage Hillary’s reputation for future political consideration.

Hillary has no future in politics. She's the old grey mare of the party, and will be let out to pasture come January 2013. She'll be happy to be there, too.

21 posted on 10/07/2012 11:27:53 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
...Hillary into the WH in 2016.

Dream on...


22 posted on 10/07/2012 11:30:25 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

You greatly overestimate the mental abilities of the average democrat voter.


23 posted on 10/07/2012 11:50:27 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

This is the same thing that is happening in Afghanistan and Iran. Abandonment at the worst possible time.


24 posted on 10/07/2012 12:35:46 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More; All

“This is the same thing that is happening in Afghanistan and Iran. Abandonment at the worst possible time.”.........

I wonder if Ambassador Stevens would still be alive today had this not been done


25 posted on 10/07/2012 1:06:59 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

Hillary was thought to have the chutzpah for tangling and entangling our military, with her vote for Iraq, so they left her alone within reason to show it, leaving the limp wristed prez free to ingratiate himself to our foreign and domestic enemies.

Until the Left are certain that Hillary will never run again, the media will deflect all scrutiny of her and see to it that she escapes without meaningful criticism, into a celebrity departure and into retirement.

The Republican Establishment follow along with no curiosity, in their own move to the left, needing Hillary voters and the disenchanted Obama voters.

Issa will get disowned before this ends and Romney is simply far too polite to persue what is clear scandal and perhaps dereliction of duty, compromising the single most important mission of the US State Department.


26 posted on 10/07/2012 1:20:59 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
You greatly overestimate the mental abilities of the average democrat voter.

I think you're overestimating their affinity for Hillary. I assure you, she's not.

27 posted on 10/07/2012 2:38:48 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

RitaOK ~ “ The Republican Establishment follow along with no curiosity, in their own move to the left, needing Hillary voters and the disenchanted Obama voters. “

I am concerned that you are right about a move to the left.
It will be all about pulling the country closer , and eliminate divisiveness ; isn’t that how we got RHinos in the first place ??

RitaOK ~ “ Issa will get disowned before this ends and Romney is simply far too polite to persue what is clear scandal and perhaps dereliction of duty, compromising the single most important mission of the US State Department.”

Issa has fought the slow , deliberate , tedious, and legally precise investigation , despite all the ‘stonewalling’ in ‘Fast & Furious’. I can only hope that this investigation into Libyian embassey fiasco should be completed sooner than that of “Fast and Furious” .

Romney ~ too polite ? Maybe so
But I do believe that there should be prosecution in the Libyia situation as it demonstrates total incompetance and dereliction of duty , and fundamental stupidity .
Prosecution ~ not just leaving office !!

Also , I just recieved word (email) that the Libyian Prime Minister is being forced to step down as he wasn’t able to draw a suitable coalition within 45 days. Now there is a renewed ‘power-struggle’ in the absence of Gadaffi ; another “Arab Spring” in the making for Libyia ?


28 posted on 10/07/2012 2:58:14 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Never said they had affinity for Hillary, and I assure you the stage was being set for Hillary to run against Romney in 2016.


29 posted on 10/07/2012 4:03:34 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
Never said they had affinity for Hillary, and I assure you the stage was being set for Hillary to run against Romney in 2016.

The stage was being set when? Certainly not after Obama was elected. Hillary's last chance was 2008. That was her high water mark, and everyone except paranoid Freepers knows it.

The Dems need to begin grooming someone new for 2016, right now. What bench they do have, is inexperienced, past their prime, underdeveloped, unknown, little known, over-the-hill, or failures of one kind or another.

30 posted on 10/07/2012 4:51:00 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Hillary's high water mark as you say, was 2004.

The Clinton's had what was called a 20 year plan.

B Clinton would serve 8 years, 4 years for another president, then Hillary would serve 8 years.

That meant the Clinton's not only had to come up with a plan to make sure Gore didn't get elected, but come up with a plan to bring down a sitting president.

First the Clinton's set up the claim Bush stole the election, then following 9/11 Hillary started the BS “Bush Knew”.

Charles Baron derailed Hillary's dirty tricks campaign in August of 02 when he popped his mouth off and let it be known race riots were being planned. Hillary then went into plan B. The video of Nick Berg was supposed to bump Kerry out by making it appear as if he and his supporters were collaborating with the terrorist in Iraq.

N Berg wasn't supposed to be killed.

Charles Baron once again popped his mouth off after Berg was killed and tied Hillary to the video by letting it be known the plan was to use Abu Graub (sp?) to gin up civil unrest in this country, so she dropped her plan to get into the WH in 04.

Hillary then kicked off her dirty tricks campaign for the 08 election in November of 2006.

Again it was a plan to orchestrate race riots.

That dirty trick campaign got derailed by the VT shooting bumping it from the news and it never regained it's momentum.

Hillary again went into a plan B which was Obama. Obama would be taken right to the very edge then declared ineligible to be president. Race riots, and Hillary was supposed to take his place. That plan was derailed when Fitz jumped on Blago and again Hillary's plan was bumped from the news.

Clinton's 92 election -race riots.

Clinton's 96 election-Chinese were shipping full auto weapons to the gangs in LA- race riots were planned

Clinton's impeachment 1999- race riots were planned

2000- Bush stole the election- attempted race riots

2002-race riots were planned

2004- attempted to gin up civil unrest

2006- Hispanics were marching through the streets fueled by Hillary

2007- race riots were planned

2008- race riots were planned

That's a pattern and it's created by the Clinton's.

The exact same pattern is being developed again.

Hillary was planning on running in 2016.

31 posted on 10/07/2012 6:43:37 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
Hillary was planning on running in 2016.

Perhaps.

Thanks for the timeline of events, but bottom line; everything about the Clintons is in the past tense. They had their day in the sun. Nothing but retirement follows.

32 posted on 10/07/2012 7:02:30 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson