Skip to comments.August: Obama's State Dept Pulled Security Teams Out of Libya
Posted on 10/07/2012 9:40:00 AM PDT by blueyon
A "Site Security Team" member claims he and his team were pulled out of Libya in August despite the fact that U.S. officials in Libya wanted more security.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Wag the dog gone wrong.
You just look at the timing of this (Aug), and wonder who knew what was going on, and told interested parties what was going to occur?
What a cabal of amateurs (or thugs) we have in charge of the country.
They were more worried about perception than reality....as usual.
It’s the “ Chicago Way “ of thuggery ; we know why “the movie “ was the State Departments mantra ... fabricate a response while we develope a ‘plausable story’ .
Ten days of lies to the American people ; 23 days to get the FBI investigators into the country .
Sure we trust the administration to protect our assets ( ie.: missles and auto-matic weapons supplied to the Arab democracies) .
There is no cover-up here !! /sar
Its the Chicago Way of thuggery ; we know why the movie was the State Departments mantra ... fabricate a response while we develop a plausible story .
What on earth is going to happen when (I think) National Geographic airs the Obama killed bin laden on Nov 3th??????????????
In 2004 they didn't intend for Nick Berg to be killed he was just supposed to make the video.
This time they didn't intend for the Ambassador to be killed they intended for him to be taken hostage, then blame Romney and the republicans of collaborating with the terrorist to make Obama look like Carter.
In Hillary's statement she contradicts herself. While she is claiming it was spontaneous because of the video, she is also implying it was planned by someone to hurt the Obama Administration.
The “journal” found by CNN is just a tad bit too convenient. Reminds me of the revolver found in Vince Fosters hand.
I’ve suspected from the very start that the administration’s and State Department’s odd explanations have been due to their being responsible for the deaths of four Americans.
Your theory makes no sense. If he had been taken hostage much of America would have looked at Obama as Carter without any connection or blow-back to Romney.
Hillary is going to get another pass isn’t she? Untouchable Hillary is the rule and ALL are endlessly abiding by it, on both sides of the aisle.
Hillary likely led and encouraged all of this, or she would have resigned quite some time ago. After all, she IS the smartest woman in every room (with food) everywhere.
blueyon ~ “ What on earth is going to happen when (I think) National Geographic airs the Obama killed bin laden on Nov 3th?????????????? “
It will take AL Jezerra a day to make copies , another 2 days for distribution to the 5,500 mile long “Arab Crescent” TV stations ( Morroco - Indonesia ) .
The only time the Muzzies are not fighting each other is when they are otherwise entertained , or already fighting “ The Great Satan “ .
I think we will see some kind of demonstration right on election day (11/6/2012 ) if we aren’t already involved in a Syrian war to spread the caliphate .
That is a real possibility. But I can't figure out how it could have gone right. Any ideas?
My fear was always that Obama was going to hand a few platoons, or more, to our enemies somehow. I forgot about our embassies...
There was always something fishy about Berg, his wacky father and 9/11. It never made any sense and certainly wasn’t just happenstance.
RitaOK ~ “ Hillary is going to get another pass isnt she? Untouchable Hillary is the rule and ALL are endlessly abiding by it, on both sides of the aisle. “
Hillary won’t just skate through this ; there will be repercussions.
While the media may have re-built the reputation of Slick Willy (who also bold-faced lied directly to the American people on TV ), not so with Hillary .
Neither of the Clintons have a reputation for honesty .
In hindsight , I believe Rice was the collateral damage , and ‘sacrificial lamb’ in an attempt to salvage Hillary’s reputation for future political consideration.
However , I believe that Libyia was too public a condemnation of State Dept. security malfeasance and ineptness to be quickly forgotten.
In a word , there are too many bodies to ignore.
They do not want Obama reelected. If he is reelected the economy is going to crash, probably will anyway, and they do not want a dem in the WH when it does. After 4 years of saying the economy is going great guns because of Obama’s policies, when it crashes there is no one to blame but Obama.
They want to be able to make the claim the economy crashed because Romney undid Obama's policies and returned us to the “Bush Years” and the policies that caused the recession in the first place.
Having him held hostage and released on the day Romney is sworn in is basically the same as Hillary holding up a newspaper saying “Bush Knew”. You have the entire 9/11 “TRUTHER” brigade back to launch Hillary into the WH in 2016.
It will also provide cover for their foreign policy failures
I think you will find the same thing with Obama. I don't think they ever intended for him to be in the WH.
I think the idea was to take Obama right to the edge then have him declared ineligible to be president and Hillary take his place.
One of the main reasons I believe this is the group that called themselves Journ-O-list(SP?).
They formed that group in February of 2007 allegedly to get Obama elected, but the same journalist were carrying Hilly's water for her dirty tricks campaign until April 2007 when it was derailed by the VT shooting bumping it from the news and it never recovered it's momentum.
One can only imagine what the media would be doing if this happened on Bush’s watch. It would be the entire first half of every evening news broadcast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.