Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vote Yes Justice Pariente [Florida Supreme Ct AFRAID of Tea Party voting them out!!]
Vote Yes Justice Pariente ^

Posted on 10/07/2012 11:52:57 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

...We should not be tempted to politicize our courts. Of course, there is nothing wrong about debating the pros and cons of court rulings, but our judges should not be tempted to decide cases based on politics rather than merits. Decisions must be based on honest interpretation of the law. We should demand impartial judges. We do not want them out raising money for campaigns.

(Excerpt) Read more at voteyesjusticepariente.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2012; fl; florida; judiciary
There is a big movement in Florida to vote OUT all three liberal justices up for "approval".

Afraid of being booted, Pariente, Quince and Lewis are liberal justices!

And now, they're running scared.

This is good news.

They are advertising on "breibart news" here in Florida.

Florida FREEPers, let's fire these clowns!

1 posted on 10/07/2012 11:53:02 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

http://voteyesjusticequince.com/
http://voteyesjusticepariente.com/
http://voteyesjusticelewis.com/


2 posted on 10/07/2012 11:54:15 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Pariente should have been tarred and feathered 12 years ago; she was a key playing in the FL Supreme Court Bush v. Gore debacle.


3 posted on 10/07/2012 11:55:14 AM PDT by JacksonCalhoun (CT Yankee in NC Exile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Vote No all Fla Supremes on ballot. Vote Yes all Florida Constitutional Amendments.

It's simple.

4 posted on 10/07/2012 11:55:29 AM PDT by agincourt1415 (Tired of the current State, and Federal Tax System go here: APTTAX.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415

we don’t agree on the amendments, but we do agree on the Kangaroos. :)


5 posted on 10/07/2012 11:57:10 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; Joe Brower; seekthetruth

Stay aware of what the enemy is up to! The liberal Supreme Court justices in Tallahassee have started to have advertising done on their behalf.


6 posted on 10/07/2012 11:58:02 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I have two simple rules of thumb when it comes to voting on sitting judges at all levels:

1. If they they feel the need to raise money to stay on the bench then it is time to vote them off.

2. If they are supported by the liberal print media, vote against them.

Enough said.

7 posted on 10/07/2012 12:03:44 PM PDT by Nip (TANSTAAFL and BOHICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Can you point me in the direction for the amendments we will be voting on?


8 posted on 10/07/2012 12:10:44 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

They are also advertising on Hulu.com.


9 posted on 10/07/2012 12:13:45 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Nope, they all have to go.


10 posted on 10/07/2012 12:15:07 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; All

I always vote “no” on retention....most Florida judges are quite liberal...from the circuit courts all the way to the FL SCOTUS. Even as the state goes further for the GOP..we seem to have way too many liberal judges

All these three will get a NO vote from me


11 posted on 10/07/2012 12:15:18 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (Political maturity is realizing that the "R" next to someone's name does not mean "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Come on Florida, Vote this bitch out! We did it in California to Jerry the Fairy’s Rose Bird. Pariente/Bird all the same bucket of crap! It ‘s time to hold judges accountable for their behavior!


12 posted on 10/07/2012 12:33:34 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

it is disgusting to see the MANDATORY membership bar BS the members and the public with thier education campaign (using bar dues lawyers HAVE to pay) to fund these reelection campaigns. They are forbidden from taking sides but the disembling by claiming the obvious is only an education campaign allows them to claim the status of the purity of mud.


13 posted on 10/07/2012 12:36:23 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415

I would vote no on everything, but I’m in Texas. OK, I’ll still vote no on everything


14 posted on 10/07/2012 12:40:02 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Around here, Republicans hand out sample ballots in front of the polls on election day, showing which candidates and ballot measures the Republican party favors.

Will the Florida Reps have the balls to put "vote no for all three judges" on their sample ballots?

15 posted on 10/07/2012 12:42:51 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Charlie Daniels - Payback Time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWwTJj_nosI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; summer; Goldwater Girl; windchime; ...

Florida Freeper


16 posted on 10/07/2012 12:47:53 PM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Outside influences or the fear of partisan retribution should not deter justices from their primary mission of rendering fair and impartial decisions based on the current law. If anyone should become upset about a decision, change the law, do not attack a court or a judge that is merely interpreting the law.

I quite agree.

Unfortunately, judges often drift over into rewriting the law to their own preferences, and if they insist on injecting themselves into the political process, they shouldn't be surprised if the political process fights back.

17 posted on 10/07/2012 12:56:03 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

supreme court judges (state and federal)

make law by interpriting law.

that is why when a USSC candiate who is asked “will you respect stare decisis?” is a 100% BS question by the persons asking and answering. The USSC ROUTINELY ignores or deliberatly overturns past rulings.


18 posted on 10/07/2012 1:10:00 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
our judges should not be tempted to decide cases based on politics rather than merits.

Has the author paid any attention to the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions at all. The majority have been political. As long as judges are human beings their decisions will be influenced by politics whether they are elected or appointed. But at least when they are elected they can be removed by the voters.

19 posted on 10/07/2012 1:10:17 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Support Free Republic.

20 posted on 10/07/2012 1:16:22 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Of course they do. And they should when past rulings are in error.

But they should not inject their own personal preferences into the process. I realize that it is very difficult to isolate such influences, but the notion that they will do so is precisely why they are given such enormous power and prestige.


21 posted on 10/07/2012 1:18:02 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I hope you are successful. I love it when liberals are afraid of the Tea Party in elections.


22 posted on 10/07/2012 1:19:05 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Vote jurists out?
Nah,
Just hang and tar the bad ones


23 posted on 10/07/2012 1:47:53 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415
"Vote Yes all Florida Constitutional Amendments. It's simple."

Amendments on the 2012 ballot:

VOTE YES on Amendment #1

BE VERY CAREFUL how you vote on all the rest.

DETAILS:

2012 Florida Amendment Voter Guide

<>

All 3 Judges are left wing and were appointed by Democrat Lawton Chiles in 97/ 98/ 99. VOTE: Not to be Retained!

bttt

24 posted on 10/07/2012 1:53:28 PM PDT by Matchett-PI ( ‘An Armed Man is a Citizen – A Disarmed Man is a Subject’ ~ Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
This is a bizarre editorial.

...but our judges should not be tempted to decide cases based on politics rather than merits.

Umm.. Yeah, and when they DO decide cases based on politics rather than merits, they need to be VOTED OUT.
Hello?

25 posted on 10/07/2012 1:58:06 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Go to the Florida forum...there is vigorous discussion. We don’t all agree. :) But at least you’ll know what the issues are.

The basic disagreement on most of them, though, is that some of us feel the legislature ought to do what some of these amendments are doing. Others of us feel these are worthy ideas justifiable by putting into the state Constitution.


26 posted on 10/07/2012 2:28:57 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chris37

I totally agree with you, just putting this up for a “heads up” that the liberal judges are scared.


27 posted on 10/07/2012 2:30:00 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
The Republican Party of Florida has taken an official position on these judges for the first time in history. They say vote to fire them all.
28 posted on 10/07/2012 2:31:33 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Yes, the official Florida Republican voter’s guide says to vote all three out!


29 posted on 10/07/2012 6:32:56 PM PDT by aberaussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
We should not be tempted to politicize our courts. Of course, there is nothing wrong about debating the pros and cons of court rulings, but our judges should not be tempted to decide cases based on politics rather than merits. Decisions must be based on honest interpretation of the law.

In that case, Justice Pariente -- in particular -- should not have decided Bush vs Gore in such a partisan political manner, should she have?

She made a patently dishonest interpretation of the law and deserves to be sent packing to the judicial boneyard.

Go get 'er, FLA FReepers and Tea Partiers.

30 posted on 10/07/2012 6:39:21 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aberaussie
Yes, the official Florida Republican voter’s guide says to vote all three out!

Splendid!

31 posted on 10/08/2012 3:08:29 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Charlie Daniels - Payback Time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWwTJj_nosI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Thanks, Matchett! See ya soon!


32 posted on 10/08/2012 5:42:39 PM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I miss President Bush! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; seekthetruth; Lancey Howard; Bushbacker1; Joe Brower; Matchett-PI; Bob Ireland; ...

Go here for Voter Guide on these three liberal Justices.

http://www.restorejustice2012.com/2012/09/florida-supreme-court-judges-voter-guide/

ALL three get F grades on these issues:

Homeowners’ rights
Patients’ rights
Right to vote
Education
Criminal justice
Junk lawsuits


33 posted on 10/09/2012 8:20:01 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Romney/Ryan Victory 2012! America's Recovery Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JacksonCalhoun
***playing in the FL Supreme Court Bush v. Gore debacle***

Remind everyone who will listen: These were the three judges that defied the US Sup Ct ruling to stop ordering ballot recounts in an attempt to skew the Florida election results!

Of course it is simple [except to an elitist Democrap]: The U.S. Constitution says that each state legislature shall determine a means of appointing a board of electors to represent their state in the Electoral College... The legislature could have named a Boy Scout troop to attend the electoral College. In short: these three judges were attempting to overthrow a Constitutional principle in order to influence an election.

It hardly needs mentioning that the media never revealed this legal point . . . BECAUSE the media are a bunch of traitors hoping to do their part in overthrowing the legal foundations of this country!!!

34 posted on 10/10/2012 11:32:17 AM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson