Skip to comments.Vote Yes Justice Pariente [Florida Supreme Ct AFRAID of Tea Party voting them out!!]
Posted on 10/07/2012 11:52:57 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
...We should not be tempted to politicize our courts. Of course, there is nothing wrong about debating the pros and cons of court rulings, but our judges should not be tempted to decide cases based on politics rather than merits. Decisions must be based on honest interpretation of the law. We should demand impartial judges. We do not want them out raising money for campaigns.
(Excerpt) Read more at voteyesjusticepariente.com ...
Afraid of being booted, Pariente, Quince and Lewis are liberal justices!
And now, they're running scared.
This is good news.
They are advertising on "breibart news" here in Florida.
Florida FREEPers, let's fire these clowns!
Pariente should have been tarred and feathered 12 years ago; she was a key playing in the FL Supreme Court Bush v. Gore debacle.
we don’t agree on the amendments, but we do agree on the Kangaroos. :)
Stay aware of what the enemy is up to! The liberal Supreme Court justices in Tallahassee have started to have advertising done on their behalf.
1. If they they feel the need to raise money to stay on the bench then it is time to vote them off.
2. If they are supported by the liberal print media, vote against them.
Can you point me in the direction for the amendments we will be voting on?
They are also advertising on Hulu.com.
Nope, they all have to go.
I always vote “no” on retention....most Florida judges are quite liberal...from the circuit courts all the way to the FL SCOTUS. Even as the state goes further for the GOP..we seem to have way too many liberal judges
All these three will get a NO vote from me
Come on Florida, Vote this bitch out! We did it in California to Jerry the Fairy’s Rose Bird. Pariente/Bird all the same bucket of crap! It ‘s time to hold judges accountable for their behavior!
it is disgusting to see the MANDATORY membership bar BS the members and the public with thier education campaign (using bar dues lawyers HAVE to pay) to fund these reelection campaigns. They are forbidden from taking sides but the disembling by claiming the obvious is only an education campaign allows them to claim the status of the purity of mud.
I would vote no on everything, but I’m in Texas. OK, I’ll still vote no on everything
Will the Florida Reps have the balls to put "vote no for all three judges" on their sample ballots?
I quite agree.
Unfortunately, judges often drift over into rewriting the law to their own preferences, and if they insist on injecting themselves into the political process, they shouldn't be surprised if the political process fights back.
supreme court judges (state and federal)
make law by interpriting law.
that is why when a USSC candiate who is asked “will you respect stare decisis?” is a 100% BS question by the persons asking and answering. The USSC ROUTINELY ignores or deliberatly overturns past rulings.
Has the author paid any attention to the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions at all. The majority have been political. As long as judges are human beings their decisions will be influenced by politics whether they are elected or appointed. But at least when they are elected they can be removed by the voters.
Of course they do. And they should when past rulings are in error.
But they should not inject their own personal preferences into the process. I realize that it is very difficult to isolate such influences, but the notion that they will do so is precisely why they are given such enormous power and prestige.
I hope you are successful. I love it when liberals are afraid of the Tea Party in elections.
Vote jurists out?
Just hang and tar the bad ones
Amendments on the 2012 ballot:
VOTE YES on Amendment #1
BE VERY CAREFUL how you vote on all the rest.
All 3 Judges are left wing and were appointed by Democrat Lawton Chiles in 97/ 98/ 99. VOTE: Not to be Retained!
...but our judges should not be tempted to decide cases based on politics rather than merits.
Umm.. Yeah, and when they DO decide cases based on politics rather than merits, they need to be VOTED OUT.
Go to the Florida forum...there is vigorous discussion. We don’t all agree. :) But at least you’ll know what the issues are.
The basic disagreement on most of them, though, is that some of us feel the legislature ought to do what some of these amendments are doing. Others of us feel these are worthy ideas justifiable by putting into the state Constitution.
I totally agree with you, just putting this up for a “heads up” that the liberal judges are scared.
Yes, the official Florida Republican voter’s guide says to vote all three out!
In that case, Justice Pariente -- in particular -- should not have decided Bush vs Gore in such a partisan political manner, should she have?
She made a patently dishonest interpretation of the law and deserves to be sent packing to the judicial boneyard.
Go get 'er, FLA FReepers and Tea Partiers.
Thanks, Matchett! See ya soon!
Go here for Voter Guide on these three liberal Justices.
ALL three get F grades on these issues:
Right to vote
Remind everyone who will listen: These were the three judges that defied the US Sup Ct ruling to stop ordering ballot recounts in an attempt to skew the Florida election results!
Of course it is simple [except to an elitist Democrap]: The U.S. Constitution says that each state legislature shall determine a means of appointing a board of electors to represent their state in the Electoral College... The legislature could have named a Boy Scout troop to attend the electoral College. In short: these three judges were attempting to overthrow a Constitutional principle in order to influence an election.
It hardly needs mentioning that the media never revealed this legal point . . . BECAUSE the media are a bunch of traitors hoping to do their part in overthrowing the legal foundations of this country!!!