Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney: I would arm Syrian rebels
Guardian ^ | 8th October 2012 | Ewen MacAskill

Posted on 10/08/2012 12:29:14 AM PDT by Zajko

Mitt Romney will call for an escalation of the conflict in Syria by arming rebels with the heavy weapons needed to confront president Bashar al-Assad's tanks, helicopters and fighter jets.

Romney is to make the proposal on Monday in what his campaign team has billed as a major foreign policy speech in Lexington, Virginia.

In extracts published in advance, he opened up the prospect, if he becomes president, of a US-Iranian proxy war being fought in Syria.

"Iran is sending arms to Assad because they know his downfall would be a strategic defeat for them. We should be working no less vigorously with our international partners to support the many Syrians who would deliver that defeat to Iran – rather than sitting on the sidelines," he said.

The proposal would mark a significant shift from Barack Obama's administration's policy of trying to keep the conflict a low-intensity one amid fears it might turn into a regional war. Obama is putting pressure on Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the main backers of the rebels, to restrict the supply of weapons to small arms.

The Republican presidential candidate has made several attempts at establishing his credentials to be commander-in-chief but those speeches made little impact. Against the background of his win over Obama in last week's debate, the Romney campaign team is hoping this speech will be better received.

The speech is aimed at countering critics who say he has not had much to say so far about foreign policy and given little indication of the lines he would pursue as president.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: romney; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: wardaddy
"Stupid...we shoulda left the Arab Spring to sort itself out."

Dangerous too. There is lots of evidence that Obama’s state department, including Susan Rice and his Arabist Robert Brennan, contributed to the series of events to put the Muslim Brotherhood in charge. Remember Hillary's closest aid worked for CAIR and ISNA, and her parents are founders of the Muslim Brotherhood. Remember that Barack’s patron, according to Percy Sutton, Malcolm X's and Louis Farrakhan's, and one of many Muslim Brotherhood attorneys, is Alwaleed bin-Talal. He supported his lawyer, Khalid al-Mansour, in buying Obama’s entry to Harvard Law (with a twenty million dollar donation and the largest division of Harvard Divinity School, the Alwaleed bin-Talal Center for Islamic Studies. Supporting the rebels in Syria is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. We already do that, and it is a death-filled policy which has licensed the killing of Christians, Alawites, Druz, and of course, Jews.

Also good to keep the source in mind. Reuters is hardly a trustworthy news source and can probably be presumed to take whatever tidbits that might keep the Marxist in office out of context.

21 posted on 10/08/2012 1:47:47 AM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


22 posted on 10/08/2012 1:51:20 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

Sorry for confusing Reuters with The Guardian. The Guardian is even more left wing, so the caution remains.


23 posted on 10/08/2012 1:54:34 AM PDT by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

Good Lord, I think this is a mistake. We never know whose side anyone is on over there, and the “rebels” we back always turn on us. Wanna remind people of GWB’s two wars? Go ahead - they are sick of war. Mistake to say he would escalate war.


24 posted on 10/08/2012 1:58:59 AM PDT by Puddleglum (http://www.facebook.com/paulhawkinsauthoradventurerexplorer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zajko
Goes nicely with the article I just read. Obama is a NWO puppet who believes he was selected for his socialism-lite. But really he was the best that the people trying to destroy America could do starting by bowing to islam. Romney was selected as a patsy with the most viable negatives. Various people around Romney will start to suggest he embrace warfare and ultimately, Armageddon.

Obviously knocking over Syria gives Iran even more breathing room to build their nukes.

25 posted on 10/08/2012 2:00:18 AM PDT by palmer (Jim, please bill me 50 cents for this completely useless post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

Not interesting.. horrifying. No good comes from getting mired in there. And the Syrian “rebels” are bloodthirsty jihadis who will be exponentially worse than what is in power there.

No, Mitt. Don`t go there.


26 posted on 10/08/2012 2:05:01 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Record high turnout is our hope for sending 0bama home. Pray hard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

The hard leftist rag The Guardian. I always get my news about Romney or our “guys” from them. How about you? /sarc


27 posted on 10/08/2012 2:25:11 AM PDT by MrDem (Founder: Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

Romney should stop listening to John McCain for foreign policy advice. If this is true. The Guardian... it’s a liberal paper. I’ll wait for more sources.


28 posted on 10/08/2012 2:31:43 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrDem

Precisely the reason I added the caveat ‘if true’ to my initial post. I also commented on the overt anti-Romney spin of the article in post 3, above.

However, some sections of this purport to be direct quotes from Romney’s speech. These comments (again: ‘if true’) are certainly cause for concern. If you have any info on this from a different - or more reliable - news source, I’d be interested in reading it.


29 posted on 10/08/2012 2:32:47 AM PDT by Zajko (Never wrestle with a pig. You'll both get dirty, but the pig likes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

Yeah, great idea, so that after they’re finished with Assad, then they can turn those weapons on Americans. Brilliant!


30 posted on 10/08/2012 2:35:56 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

You do realize that Romney has not said this yet.

This article says “would”, not Romney “said”.

This is the guardiam, I think I will wait until Romney actually says something.


31 posted on 10/08/2012 2:48:27 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

If mitt does this, he will give it to Obama.

I’ll be mad as hell at him.


32 posted on 10/08/2012 2:48:27 AM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

The national interests of the United States would not be advanced by getting involved in a conflict between the Iranian-backed government and the Muslim Brotherhood backed rebels. We should stay out and get popcorn.


33 posted on 10/08/2012 2:54:02 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Charlie Daniels - Payback Time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWwTJj_nosI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joe212

When I first read the article, I thought of McCain. The man is a lunatic. Listening to McLame, will put Obama in for a second term.


34 posted on 10/08/2012 2:54:09 AM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

Not our problem nor our responsibility.


35 posted on 10/08/2012 2:55:30 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaisingCain
I’ve read numerous articles talking about his “secret” support.

I personally suspect that's what all the stories about the government buying billions of rounds of ammo are all about.
36 posted on 10/08/2012 2:58:17 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

I would stay out of it. Humanitarian aid only and only after the shooting stops. Furthermore, drop the aid from the air. No personnel for the savages to kidnap.


37 posted on 10/08/2012 2:59:09 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

???

I think Al Qaeda is arming them well enough


38 posted on 10/08/2012 3:17:14 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zajko

Well, I would arm them too, but not to win. Just to keep destroying Syria.

I would take the same approach throughout the entire muslim world.


39 posted on 10/08/2012 3:36:10 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boycott
When I first read the article, I thought of McCain. The man is a lunatic. Listening to McLame, will put Obama in for a second term.

I felt sick to my stomach reading this article.

It reminded me why I voted in 2000 primaries for W rather than McLame. W was talking about humble foreign policy, McCain was talking as if he was about to start war with Russia...

McLame is still at it...

I just hope that Romney has some wise advisors (Not McLame). The whole foreign policy is a mine field. Obama team is just waiting for Romney to step on a mine...

Foreign Policy for Romey should be only Obama failures: Egypt, Libya (rest of North Africa) plus failure of the whole Iran policy. He does not need to solve anything in a speech or a debate. Just point to Obama failures, walk away.

40 posted on 10/08/2012 3:37:05 AM PDT by joe212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson