Skip to comments.Bombshell: Obama.com Owned by Bundler in Shanghai with Business Ties to Chinese Government
Posted on 10/08/2012 5:56:50 AM PDT by Perdogg
In an explosive report set to send shockwaves through official Washington, the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) released a 108-page GAI investigation into the threat of foreign and fraudulent Internet campaign donations in U.S. federal elections
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
owned by “Acorn International”. What an interesting name for a company.”””
What are there.....something like 11 million words in the English language & this is the word they use?
NOT a coincidence...
Could have a worn disconnector!
Non literal translation from mob Italian : ya got nothin. Other uses and trans can be found googleing stugots. From questo cazzo. Most other uses refer to genitalia.
With the help of Rush, Sean, Mark, Drudge more will learn of it.
Late to the thread so this may have been mentioned...the Friends on Fox did a segment on this topic this morning.
If I understand correctly, the reason why this is different from 2008 is the extent of the Bambi bundlers’ social-media penetration into foreign sites & blogs. And if foreign bloggers bragged about actually being able to make contributions, that’s pretty big.
What makes you think so? Isn’t this the same old tripe we’ve seen associated with Clinton and Obama all along - foreign influence, the Riadys, etc. etc.
FReepers care, but no one else.
I would love to be wrong, but I feel as if I have heard all this before - and it has never had a negative impact on Democrats.
A lot of the UC and Haaahvaahd contributions may have been kickbacks from the “green-energy” stimulus grants. (Speculation, but it’s nothing compared to the Donkeys’ baseless accusations of Mitt being a felon.)
I believe he meant ‘slogans’.
“Romney doesnt have the nuts to use it.”
He’s nuts if he doesn’t. And I believe he will in the next debate. In the last debate, he didn’t mind connecting 0bama’s $90 billion in “green energy” to his campaign donors. The release of this report was perfectly timed for the foreign policy debate. The fact that our president is being bribed by the Chinese (a long standing Chinese tradition, by the way) is fair game in a foreign policy debate.
And given the source of the report, it’s not GOP partisan, and its not tin-foil hat, either.
Just a FWIW factoid:
Back when CA decided that SKS rifles were subject to the state’s AW ban, CA had a website detailing what was banned and how transgressors could submit.
The website was registered & owned by someone in Bejing. I publicized this, and the site suddenly was registered to someone in CA.
Think Moctar Riady.
Rush just mentioned it.
According to the GAI report, 68 percent of all Internet traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign visitors.
disconnector pretty well worn here on FR. Though maybe had my sear selected to auto, he he.
Great! Thank you!
It was a Chinese website before the 2008 election.
“WayBack Machine” snapshot of Obama.com on Feb. 24, 2007:
The only way Dems can win is by cheating any way they can. Foreign money, making it easy for illegals to vote, dead votes, no voter ID, minimize military votes, and of course early clueless absentee voting are all part of the strategy. It is a sickening smoke screen on the pretext of looking out for the little guy. Of course they impugn the motives of conservatives as cruel, self-centered, haters when we point out their corrupt, criminal enterprises. Like Churchill, we can “Never Quit” fighting for the highest ideals of America.
In short, the Obama campaign is not only in violation of Federal campaign laws, but could get sued by Visa and Mastercard for a huge amount of money for credit card fraud. OUCH.
Media says “Romney threatened Big Bird!”
“Apparently the Democrat Party has been in bed with the Communist Chinese raising cash since at least Clinton.”
Exactly, which as why we here all think this is a big deal (it is as was Clinton taking donation money from China), but it will never go anywhere, Obama supporters and the MSM don’t think it’s a big deal and it will not go anywhere...
Romney needs to call Obama on these things - I know he’s doing better since the debate, but they need to really point out these things...
Remember, Hillary was on the Board of Directors of Walmart prior to the 1992 election..
Has ANY news outlet picked this up? I blew up my TV( and shot it) for a reason. But inquiring minds and all....
Remember Charlie Trie and all the illegal contributions to Clinton that were never prosecuted as the donors fled back to China?
Obama Campaign Receiving Illegal Donations from Foreigners
A new report by the Government Accountability Institute shows that President Obamas donation page lacks basic security to prevent illegal donations from non-citizens. The report also reveals that Democrat donor Robert Roche has ties to an unofficial website designed to drive foreign donors to the Obamas campaign. Even worse, according to the report, over 47% of Congressional websites dont have security to prevent illegal donations.
From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
"Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants."
Hillary's donor linked to China missile trader
(Norman Hsu --pronounced 'shoe')
World Net Daily^ | 10/02/07
"'We like your president. We want to see him reelected', former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung. Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clintons way."
HERE IS A SCREEN SAVER SHOT FROM THE ACTUAL OBAMA 2008 ONLINE DONATION SERVER.
(This may already be covered. It was found from a Japanese site today). This is the site foreigners could be directed to donate to him from abroad, with no verification.
YOU WILL NOTE a) the drop down box includes every country in the world, including (and in this case) IRAN. b) THERE IS NO CALL FOR CREDIT CARD SECURITY CODE, so anyone could donate from anywhere using cheap disposable debit type cards, cards linked to a US account but still held by a non-US citizen, etc. etc.. c) These Silicon Valley, Facebook-type whiz kid Obamanists in 2008 had at some time midstream at least the goodsense to take out "North Korea" from the dropdown dialogue box, but left in all the other axis of evil nations, including Iran. Again, donations did indeed come from these countries, I am convinced, in small amounts just under the radar. Evidence from their own website from four years ago that hangs them:
Obama was traced to illegal fund-raising from Chinese October 10, 2012 13:30:37 3【字号: 大 中 小】 【打印】[Error correction] U.S. non-governmental organizations, the Government Accountability Institute published a report of up to 109, and to many foreign countries, including China, Vietnam, Azerbaijan, Japan, Norway, the Netherlands, Egypt, accused the Obama campaign team to seek donations and receives foreign credit cards online transactions, in violation of federal election law in the United States. " U.S. law prohibits candidates for the presidential election to accept donations of non-US citizens. "Washington Post" reported that the Obama team tried to prevent the report, saying the accusations "unfounded", but did not succeed. According to the Washington examiner newspaper reports, entitled "fragile U.S.: foreign and deceptive online campaign fundraising is affecting the U.S. presidential election, "the report by the Government Accountability Institute lasted 9 months survey preparation. For online donations, the Obama campaign team only ask for donations to enter three of the back of the card security code, without having to provide further safety information. Such refusal to take the online trading industry-standard practices, security measures can save millions of dollars for the campaign team of network transaction fees. The Institute through a series of online search tool, "my.barackobama.com" link of the Obama campaign website that some foreign websites. The report said a Chinese blogger once Obama campaign distributed his message posted online, every message requires a donation of $ 3 or 5, such a small donation campaign team is not required to keep any records. In addition, many countries who have received the Obama campaign messages require donations or helped the Obama campaign website address is uploaded to the Internet. In particular, the report pointed out that the site to accept donations via credit card online transactions "Obama.com" Robert Lodge, an American businessman living in Shanghai registered in 2008. Washington examiner newspaper said Lodge from the U.S. state of Illinois, has 19 times since 2009 to visit the White House, including a private meeting with Obama. In 2010, Rocky the domain was sold to an unidentified person. British "Daily Mail" also quoted the contents of the report, said the data from Google online traffic analysis service, Obama.com "Approximately 68% of the traffic from the IP address outside the United States. Fox News quoted interview Schweizer, director of the Government Accountability Institute, said, "Obama campaign team to attract online donations are the most successful, the most daring, this is very clear. they received up to trillions of dollars in small donations, often to seek contributions to the people around the world, "according to the relevant provisions of the United States, less than $ 200 donations do not need to disclose relevant information. Schweizer also said many American politicians fundraising website has a similar "defects", and warned foreign governments understand the weakness of the U.S. election, and look forward to take advantage of them ". For the content of the report, the Obama team said in a statement, do not accept donations from foreign citizens, and proof of address system to confirm the authenticity of the donors as a U.S. citizen through the blog. The statement also said that the Government Accountability Institute allegations merely reflects its political stance, does not contain any facts ". (Chen Yiming)
Actual photo is at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/barackobamadotcom/2674476891/
There could be incriminating photo evidence in these photos.
This has links to photos of 2008 "supporters is Bishkek, Kyrgystan". Thumb nail photo:
Actual photo, among many other photos that are no doubt Americans overseas supporting Obama in 2008--which is not a crime--but could also be foreign nationals mixed in, the Chinese photos make me feel that way particularly---and of course if they contributed at sign up tables with cash and what not, phony debit cards etc, we are sitting on a potential powder keg of a story:
These are just dead websites apparently, writing is in Japanese, domain ISP has links to news and other items, not the actual website that was active in 2008 apparently....
Apparently this screenshot (2008 Obama International Donations) is already in the whistle blower report just released. But just to be sure, posted it.