Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: Green energy not ‘socialist plot’
The Hill ^

Posted on 10/08/2012 9:09:14 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Obama: Green energy not ‘socialist plot’ By Ben Geman - 10/08/12 09:59 AM ET

President Obama quipped Sunday night that energy efficiency initiatives are not a “socialist plot” in remarks that contrasted his energy policies with rival Mitt Romney’s.

The president, fundraising in Los Angeles, addressed energy during a $25,000-per-plate dinner with backers that included actor George Clooney.

“On energy, I’m big on oil and gas, and developing clean coal technology, but I also believe that if we’re ever going to have control of our energy future, then we’ve got to invest in solar and wind and biofuels, and that it does make sense for us to double our fuel-efficiency standards on cars,” Obama said, according to a White House transcript.

“And that's not a socialist plot for us to reduce our energy usage,” Obama said to laughter, according to the transcript. “It’s the smart thing to do. It’s right for our national energy. It’s right for our economy. It’s right for the environment. [Romney] disagrees.”

Obama didn’t get specific about Romney's alleged disagreement.

But the GOP nominee in late August bashed new auto mileage rules for model years 2017-2025 that will ultimately require automakers to build cars and light trucks with a fleet-wide average of 54.5 miles-per-gallon.

Romney, through a spokeswoman, called the standards “extreme,” and said they will “limit the choices available to American families.”

The Romney campaign also emphasized the higher up-front costs of the vehicles, while the Obama administration touted savings in fuel costs over time and reduced oil consumption. (Click here for much more on the rules.)

While energy efficiency programs often have bipartisan support, various federal standards have drawn pushback from some Republicans who call them undue federal intrusion into consumer choices.

House Republicans, over the last two years, have sought to roll back lightbulb efficiency standards contained in a bipartisan 2007 energy law.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012issues; bhoenergy; bhofascism; bhosocialism; envirowhackos; greenfraud; greens; obama; youlie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Sub-Driver

That is ALL that “green energy” is!

Did you see the Fox special last night that addressed the meaning of “Sustainable”?

Amazingly, since 2007, there are now 600 colleges and universities, across America, that have “sustainability” as the most recent incarnation of COMMUNISM, as their top indoctrination priority.

It includes intimidation to accept gay “marriage” and a requirement that white students admit that they are racist.


41 posted on 10/08/2012 9:39:20 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama says ““On energy, I’m big on oil and gas, and developing clean coal technology...”

HE IS A LIAR.

LIES, LIES and MORE LIES.


42 posted on 10/08/2012 9:43:26 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“On energy, I’m big on oil and gas, and developing clean coal technology****

We’ve had clean coal technology for some time, but that has never been the shape shifter’s goal. He was much more honest back in 2008 when he stated, “so if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.”

The man has declared war on oil, natgas and coal and his EPA has become the major impediment to our achieving energy independence.


43 posted on 10/08/2012 9:46:55 AM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“On energy, I’m big on oil and gas, and developing clean coal technology****

We’ve had clean coal technology for some time, but that has never been the shape shifter’s goal. He was much more honest back in 2008 when he stated, “so if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can. It’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.”

The man has declared war on oil, natgas and coal and his EPA has become the major impediment to our achieving energy independence.


44 posted on 10/08/2012 9:47:11 AM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Liar!


45 posted on 10/08/2012 9:47:33 AM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Of course not! At least not to a marxist!


46 posted on 10/08/2012 9:50:15 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther

I tell I’ve no doubt that the N.A.Z.I. party is now rising in the United States, and it will be up to Americans to defeat it again.


47 posted on 10/08/2012 9:55:50 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Another day, another Straw Man argument.

No one ever said "Green Energy" was a socialist plot. It is a gargantuan waste of taxpayer money, however. And it's not an "investment", either. The government has no money to invest. It can only spend what it taxes away from producers or prints out of thin air.

Twenty-nine days until we're rid of this Marxist, quasi-Kenyan prick, people. Just twenty-nine days. Pray.

48 posted on 10/08/2012 9:56:52 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Cogito, ergo armatum sum: "I think, therefore I am armed".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
In the wake of the email scandal (of which the public was not informed) Gov'ts have all backed away from Kyoto.

The rhetoric now is all a lie...even though they're still scaring island nations to death by claiming they will soon be swamped by the seas they don't even have the junk science anymore to support it.

Yes, this is definitely all a socialist plot to get control of the wealth created from energy...nothing more.

49 posted on 10/08/2012 10:05:08 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Take away the Tax Credit that Wind Generators make and watch how fast they shut down.


50 posted on 10/08/2012 10:06:35 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Well, no... Actually it's a Pagan Plot by GovernMental EnvironMental religionists!!!

It's also a Punishment Plot against all American "resourse extractors" for their rape of Giaia!!!

51 posted on 10/08/2012 10:39:09 AM PDT by SierraWasp ("The New Normal," is FAR from any normality!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I agree with the President. Green energy is not a socialist plot.

It is a plot to take money from rich people and give it to richer people. It's a scam.

52 posted on 10/08/2012 10:48:51 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No, actual green energy in of itself is not a “socialist plot”...however, the way Obama wants to go about it most certainly is - if not socialist definitely tyrannical.


53 posted on 10/08/2012 10:58:57 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Fine, if it isn’t then it is a banana republic plot. IS that better Babmi, your choom-smoking highness?


54 posted on 10/08/2012 11:34:32 AM PDT by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I am not a crook”.


55 posted on 10/08/2012 11:45:41 AM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Oh, well, if obama says so, it’s got to be...uhm...


56 posted on 10/08/2012 12:16:15 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Obama: Green energy not ‘socialist plot’

Ladies and gentlemen, please give it up for the comedic stylings of Barack Hussein Obama, hmmm, hmmm, hmmm!!!

57 posted on 10/08/2012 2:47:20 PM PDT by Amagi (Chief Justice John Roberts is a traitorous weasel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It’s all about control.


58 posted on 10/09/2012 4:13:24 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
He is right.

“Green Energy” is a criminal plot to loot the treasury, enrich cronies, and launder tax money back into Democrat coffers.

A criminal plot to loot the treasury, enrich cronies, and launder tax money back into Democrat coffers is a form of crony socialism.

Cordially,

59 posted on 10/09/2012 4:33:22 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Diamond

Well, I’ve always figured that socialism is type of criminal enterprise, anyway.


60 posted on 10/09/2012 5:03:44 AM PDT by Little Ray (AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson