Skip to comments.Did Obama deliberately try to stage a hostage taking in Benghazi as an “October Surprise”
Posted on 10/08/2012 5:34:49 PM PDT by RummyChick
click here to read article
While they may not be that intelligent, then entire sequence of operations, behavior of Hillary, Obama, and Administration, was very reminiscent of the Clinton Administration tone in their press-worthy significant events.
There is something in this which reeks of Clinton’ political spirit contriving the entire episode. It’s the same tone as the Elian affair, of Waco Branch Davidians, Watergate,...
It isn’t simple response or reaction. It’s contrived for a particular outcome, with the particular manifested mechanics being irrelevant, but nearly identical in tone to past Clintonian political operation episodes.
I haven’t fully grasped it, but I have perceived a unique Modus Operendi identifiable with the past Clinton’ spirit. It is very unique to their flavor of political action.
When it was absolutely clear the video had nothing to do with the murders of 4 Americans, in spite of Obama and his crew attempts to say otherwise, the hysteria over the video dried up. I think this administration believed their own press about how much they are loved in Libya for removing a dictator. BUT running parallel to Obama’s overtures to the rebels, his drones are still taking out AlQaeda leadership... and AlQaeda took advantage of no security.
” I said this - in a reduced form - in a post about a week ago. “
(Are we allowed to say/reference LameCherry? so I will try:)
Way back, near the very beginning of this all, the LC blog had a, as usual, long and fully detailed post which laid out exactly this as the reason it was planned, for a hostage situation - wonder where they would have gotten that idea hmmmm - and our superman/gal (or superzer0) would ride to the rescue with great acclamation at just the right time.
Ever since reading that post, this explanation has seemed perfectly logical to me, like putting the right size peg in right size hole. And all the other explanations folks have been coming up with just never seemed to fit right in that hole.
as the old saying goes: never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.
yes, made sense to me - the part I could make sense of - but I had also had the basic thought from jump that it was a number like that. It seemed obvious, like a movie plot.
“Sorry, this makes no sense. You dont set such things in motion without control of all the acting parties. Anyone can understand that the odds of success are very low with the unknowns evident in this plan.”
For starters, Fast and Furious.
And if you REALLY delve deep into the CIA activities..plenty of things are set in motion with NO control over most parties.
here is an interesting post on Hillbuzz
“I hope youre wrong about this. However, the scenario for this type of thing actually going down is not beyond narcissism.
Having a borderline malignant narcissist in the family, having no plan B is not in their make-up. They really, truly, believe that their plans will turn out exactly as they plan them. Theyre so convinced of the sheer brilliance of the plan that they can see no other outcome but success. The thought that someone might get hurt, or worse, never enters their mind. Ive seen the or worse part take place. Its not tragic; its downright evil.”