Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the scotsman
LOL. In the UK, the subjects have to wait with bated breath to see if the almighty state will grant them the privilege of defending themselves with deadly force.

Hey, it's better than nothing.

Sorry, I don't mean to antagonize citizens of the UK: just their government.

But it continues to astound me how incomplete non-Americans' concept of Freedom can be. Not that we have it perfect here, there's plenty of Tyranny floating around.

But at least Americans can point to it on paper and try to maximize it in practice.

18 posted on 10/08/2012 9:27:09 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sargon
In the UK, the subjects have to wait with bated breath to see if the almighty state will grant them the privilege of defending themselves with deadly force.

Not quite. The right has always existed in common law, and has been exercised by many over the centuries without prosecution, including recent times. What is being proposed clarifies what are believed by many to be unhelpful ambiguities in the statute law, which have led to some well-publicised hard cases in recent years. Had the facts of some of those cases (such as the notorious Tony Martin case) been replicated, I'm told that the householder would have been in serious trouble in more than one US state jurisdiction.

20 posted on 10/09/2012 1:29:04 AM PDT by Winniesboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: sargon

Yes, we are citizens, not subjects.


29 posted on 10/09/2012 3:49:01 AM PDT by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson