Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BIG NEWS: Feds Paid $40 Million to Claire McCaskill’s Husband’s Businesses (calls for tax returns)
The Gateway Pundit ^ | 10/9/12 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 10/09/2012 11:34:20 AM PDT by barmag25

Game Changer? The federal government paid nearly $40 million dollars to Claire McCaskill’s husband’s businesses her first five years in office as Missouri Senator. During that time McCaskill has had influence over federal policy that has directly affected her family’s income.

Missouri royalty - The rest of the country has suffered but Claire McCaskill and her husband Joseph Shepard have done very well these past five years.

There are renewed calls for Democrat McCaskill to release her tax returns. ABC3040 reported:

Businesses affiliated with the husband of Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill have received almost $40 million in federal subsidies for low-income housing developments during her first five years in office, though it appears only fraction of that has made it to the family’s bank accounts, according to an Associated Press analysis.

McCaskill’s Republican challenger, Rep. Todd Akin, says the federal payments should be a cause for concern among voters. He’s attempting to portray the Democratic senator’s family as a prime beneficiary of government largesse.

“There is a conflict of interest and a breach of trust with the citizens of our state,” Akin said in an interview with the AP.

McCaskill campaign spokesman Caitlin Legacki called such assertions “flat-out wrong.”

There is no evidence that McCaskill personally routed the money to her husband’s businesses. But she voted for some – and against other – bills that funded the federal housing and agriculture departments, which in turn provide subsidies to businesses with federal contracts to provide low-income housing.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2014election; 2016election; caitlinlegacki; clairemccaskill; corruption; demagogicparty; election2012; election2014; election2016; ethics; josephshepard; mafiatactics; mccaskill; mccaskillhusband; missouri; organizedcrime; porkulus; stimulus; toddakin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: barmag25

Bye bye Claire, we hardly knew ya!


21 posted on 10/09/2012 4:24:45 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Don’t count your chickens! But if he wins, he can tell the GOPe to go Helgoland.


22 posted on 10/09/2012 4:25:51 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

I can believe it. A bunch of crooks that need to be in jail.


23 posted on 10/09/2012 4:49:25 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

“Independent superPACS are now with Akin. He’s doing well. I think he’ll win it. McCatSkull is just too unpopular.”

I’m a Missouri resident, and I am actually going to vote FOR Todd Akin rather than just against McRascal. However, except for moral/social conservatives like myself, I am concerned that most of the support for Akin is actually rejection of McRascal. That may not be enough to overcome her liberal bastions (and the ghetto vote) in St. Louis and Kansas City. Were it just the rural counties, then Todd Akin would easily win. It is the city liberals and ghetto dwellers that vote for any dem. They are the same ones that will be supporting Obama.


24 posted on 10/09/2012 7:35:25 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: barmag25
"Businesses affiliated with the husband of Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill have received almost $40 million in federal subsidies for low-income housing developments during her first five years in office, though it appears only fraction of that has made it to the family’s bank accounts, according to an Associated Press analysis. "

Note how the press (in this case ABC, which did not break the story) becomes the minimizer, trying to salvage the Dems: ...it appears only a fraction....

How BIG is a "fraction?" You know if it was a Republican, this tattered fig-leaf artifice would be left out.

25 posted on 10/18/2012 11:07:52 PM PDT by cookcounty ("When I speak, I say what I mean and I mean what I say!" ---Joe Biden, 10/11/2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson