Since when does “unarmed” mean “not at all dangerous in any way whatsoever”?
Exactly. If you keep advancing on someone who has warned you they feel threatened and are armed... What do you expect? Only an idiot (or a liberal) would let that person walk up on them, hoping that their good human nature would prevail and protect them... To me, this sounds like suicide by (armed) neighbor.
“Since when does “unarmed” mean “not at all dangerous in any way whatsoever”?”
Almost any man coming at me in an agressive manner would be a danger to me because of the disparity in size and physical strength.
Gun = great equalizer.
The left would REALLY like to advance that narrative in order to justify their lie that "if no one but the police had guns, no violence would occur".