Skip to comments.Woman Tells Chris Matthews Obama Is a ‘Communist’ on Live Television: ‘He’s a Communist, Buddy’
Posted on 10/12/2012 2:22:59 AM PDT by Mozilla
MSNBCs Chris Matthews confronted a woman outside Centre College in Danville, Ky., the location of Thursdays vice presidential debate, who yelled out that President Obama is a communist while he was interviewing people about the presidential race.
Who said communist down here? Matthews asked, locating the woman and asking her why she believes Obama is in fact a communist.
All you have to do is study it out. Just study it out. And youll see. You havent done your homework, buddy, the woman told Matthews.
And what do I need to study? he replied.
Hes a communist, she said again. And those of us who are not voting for him know it.
And what do you mean by communist? asked Matthews.
You dont know? the woman asked, looking genuinely surprised.
No, just tell me. Help me out here, the host said.
You dont know? she repeated.
I just want to know what you mean, Matthews added, clearly amused by the womans ranting.
Oh, I know what I mean.
Well, help us out. Youre on national television, Matthews went on.
Assuming the woman may be a birther as well, the host asked her whether she thought the president was an American.
On, no Just because he was born here doesnt mean he thinks like us, she explained.
Hes a communist, buddy, she said one more time, prompting a mix of boos and cheers from the crowd mostly boos.
Needless to say, the woman didnt even come close to making any kind of reasonable argument to back up her claim that Obama is actually a communist.
He doesn't know?
The corpulant lady who happily sold herself to the devil for Obamacare will be shocked that when/if she ever makes it to the trough, it will have been licked clean. No cake, no frosting, no donuts, nada.
IMO, calling him a Communist is evidence of a person taking their eyes off the ball.
He’s a fundamentalist follower of Islam. As such, he can’t separate himself from the desires of other fundamentalist followers of Islam.
Now THAT is food for thought.
Sure he’s a socialist, but more importantly he’s actually a front man for the desires of fundamentalist followers of Islam. His goal is to end once and for all, the impact of the United States and it’s Western allies on global dynamics.
Watch 2016. It spells it out perfectly clear. He sees the U. S. as a colonialist power, and he thinks it needs to be neutered because it is (in his opinion).
He’s not doing this in the interest of world Communism. He’s doing it on behalf of the world’s oppressed, which just happen to be mostly Islamic in the circles he has lived in. His radical father weighed heavily upon him. His step dad did. Tack on radical heavily anti-U. S. influences he has been associated with in the U. S., and it becomes quite clear who this guy is, and what he wants to do.
sorry she didnt say more
Obama want the government to collect all your money, redistribute it, and then tell you how you're going to run your life. What else is this but communist?
Either the author is incredibly ignorant or incredibly dishonest. Or, then again, he could be both.
“Sure hes a socialist, but more importantly hes actually a front man for the desires of fundamentalist followers of Islam.”
His attacks on the family/reproduction would indicate more that he represents atheistic Communism; Muslims have no use for his “gay” and abortion agendas.
Here’s what I wish would be the question:
“Obama admitted being an avid follower of marxism in college - in his autobiography.
Has he ever said when he stopped?”
“His attacks on the family/reproduction would indicate more that he represents atheistic Communism;”
I agree. I have always considered him a Marxist and atheist, but sympathetic to Muslims.
Both of his possible fathers were radical Marxist, as well as his friends, associates, and his church/pastor.
Other then some youth years in Indonesia, I see only slight Muslim tendencies
The support for Muslims is just blatant anti-Americanism; he has nothing in common with them in terms of faith (diet, “bagging” females, opposition to homosexuality, etc.). I believe Obama is a Muslim, but a Muslim who doesn’t practice his faith at all beyond viewing the US as the Great Satan.
” I believe Obama is a Muslim”
I still say he is an Atheist, in the tradition of his parents and his behavior, but if he accepted ANY religion, it would be Muslim.
When he took the throne there was the hubbub about which church in Washington he would attend.
To my knowledge, he has not attended ANY church or mosque.
At least this woman was smarter than the people who were interviewed by Howard Stern.
I think the tingling down Chrissy’s leg this time is from Chrissy peeing his pants.
The lady is right, Obama is a Communist. What evidence did anyone provide to refute her argument?
Agreed. And he’s sympathetic to Muslims like all leftists are because, they further the agenda of anti-Christian anti jew anti-western culture that the Communist believe in as well.
Modern philosophers (Marx, etc.) sanitized it for the masses but Islam IS the basis of communism.
“I still say he is an Atheist, in the tradition of his parents and his behavior, but if he accepted ANY religion, it would be Muslim.
When he took the throne there was the hubbub about which church in Washington he would attend.
To my knowledge, he has not attended ANY church or mosque.”
I don’t believe he’s atheistic, after all, an atheist doesn’t believe in any god. Barak H. Obama is a member of the Barak H. Obama church. He’s just that narcissistic.
He says he’s a Christian, I’m not his judge but I am a fruit inspector.
“You’re on national television here.”
“I’m going to use the full force of the national media to try to humiliate and intimidate anyone who tries to call us what we are.”
“Needless to say, the woman didnt even come close to making any kind of reasonable argument to back up her claim that Obama is actually a communist.”
Why did “The Blaze” throw that bit of state-run media bias into the article?
I’ve called him “Obammie the Commie” since 2008, blaze. Let me know if you want any kind of reasonable argument explaining why.
The evidence is so blatant, I wish they’d asked me. Read Karl Marx Communist Manifesto, the check list for it, is obviously siting on Owebama’s desk.
1) nationalization of private industry, Bank of America, General Motors—Owebama appointees run them
2) confiscation of personal and private property, $350 billion worth of properties bought off the banks and put in control of the nationalized Bank of America (Owebama’s first idea-—rent them back to the public).
3) control of the food supply, the many of those toxic assets were farms, look how controlling USDA has gotten, even to the point of controlling kids menu’s in schools (does anybody remember Hitler’s favorite Oxtail and cabbage soup that was all that was on the grocer’s shelves?)
4) separate the people from their faith
5) nationalization of health care
6) class warfare
7) abolition of inheritance rights (look at Owebama’s stance on that—he wants to take the biggest share of it)
And on top of that, he wants to throw islamofascism right on top of it, which is basically the same thing with a barbarianism thrown on top.
The two beasts of Revelation: corrupt government and corrupt religion. What government is more corrupt than communism? What religion is more corrupt than Islam? In the end, the two work together to serve the dragon, Satan.
The goals of communism and Islamism end up being the same.
Islam says is is opposed to homosexuality but from everything I’ve heard by people who lived among them, homosexual acts are rampant. Probably because everything is a sex object - including women, children, men, and animals. The reason to execute gays is to control other people. Same reason as Michelle Obama has to tell us how much salt we can have on our tofu. It’s a control issue.
And the same thing with reproduction. When Muslims want to abort a child they simply trump up some fake charges and stone to death its mother - thus killing both mother and child. They use their living children as human shields to hide behind. So even amongst themselves they are not really pro-life.
But in that time period before Muslims have the ability to execute infidels through sharia, why would a Muslim want to end abortion - the infidels voluntarily slaughtering their children? That slaughter is what will ultimately enable Muslims to take over the electoral process and lawfully turn every democratic country into a sharia state. They would be fools to fight abortion while they are working to overtake countries, since abortion is slow, systematic death to the demographic groups that could balance out the Muslims.
Everything Obama has ever done serves the purposes of both communism and Islamism. He is the union of the two towers, the two beasts which both serve the dragon.
And why is Dear Reader's "mentor" (according to multiple sources) Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying Party member???
And don't even get me started on Bill Ayers.
Nah ... only stupid people would think Obozo was a communist, right Chrissy? /s
close, but wrong word MARXIST is the one I’d use
Billy Graham to endorse Mitt & Ryan
How ridiculous to say Romney is a Mormom.
I mean, just because his parents, his grandparents, his mentors, his friends, his education, his sponsors, and his church were/are all Mormon, it’s ridiculous to make the charge that he’s a “Mormon”... Come on, who are you, McCarthy?
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
I’ve put this in front of leftist/democrats before and asked them to show the difference between it and democrat policies.
The more creative of them say that those are good ideas, it’s just that the communists didn’t implement them correctly, and the democrats will.
obama is a halfrican, communist, mooselimb, fag bottom, druggy, PRICK.
In the modern vernacular, Communist = euro social democrat
ping for later
Technically, I would call him a “socialist internationalist communist”. The Socialist International is an organization of national political parties around the world, whose rather ominous logo is a rose clenched in a fist.
The American Democrat party is a de facto member of the SI, but it is terrified of being recognized as such, as even they know that socialism is anathema in America, so must be concealed at all cost, and created in America through gradualism, guile, stealth and deceit.
Importantly, there are many Republican leaders that also embrace *some* of its ideas, if not membership, and they and the Democrats conceal this affiliation by calling themselves “internationalist”, “free trade”, and similar labels.
The SI should never be underestimated either for its determination, cunning or ruthlessness in advancing its agenda. They are such determined believers that they are incapable of recognizing when their schemes fall flat because they are inherently awful ideas.
So what are their hallmarks?
1) Internationalism before nationalism. They see nations as arbitrary creations of no inherent value, that are inherently bad because they create conflict to advance nationalist goals.
2) Equality is superior to any kind of individualism. Thus they reject ethnicity, language, culture, and both individual success and failure, in favor a gray mediocrity or even sub-mediocrity, which is easier to achieve.
In practice this is somewhat like the philosophy of a sheep herd. All members look identical. There is no initiative or action other than as the group as a whole. It is better that the herd all run off a cliff, than an individual sheep leads them to safety.
In human terms this was well described in the old, intensely socialist Sweden, where the very best career was said to be a poor, bad artist, as the government would do anything, pay you a fortune, so that you would no longer be bad, but mediocre. Yet if you sold a single painting, you would be completely cut off and ignored.
3) The factions of SI. Environmentalism, anti-militarism, multiculturalism, social engineering through ‘education’, etc.
Importantly, full nationalization has fallen out of favor among many socialists, who now prefer the national socialist economics model of “public-private partnerships” (like General Motors, or the crony capitalists in the green industries sponsored by the administration.) This was because with full nationalization, a lot of hard work is involved, but “ppp” is much easier.
As far as Obama goes, while his version of SI indeed has communist leanings, it is of the African, anti-colonialist playbook. In short, he sees America as a colonial power who can only be redeemed by reducing its international stature to the level of a “second world country”.
Do they hate him? Yes, they sure do.
Do they have a use for him? Yes, they sure do.
1. He sets rules of engagement to endanger our men, and give them the upper hand
2. He removes our ambassador’s defense team
3. He helps them overturn vile but stable leaders causing regional chaos
4. He cuts our military
5. He advances the Islamic cause in the U. S. with his policies
These and other ways, this guy does things they very much have a use for.
That’s an interesting take. You may be right. I haven’t heard that before, but I can’t say you’re wrong either.
I think his sympathy for Muslims is more in line with the general sympathy liberals have for the Palestinians. In any conflict they support whichever side is poorer and browner, whether they’re right or wrong.
I have an old tagline that says: “Islam is a violent and tyrannical political ideology and has nothing to do with a religion.”
I believe I’ve seen it. At any rate, I’m in agreement with it.
“Obama want the government to collect all your money, redistribute it, and then tell you how you’re going to run your life. What else is this but communist?”
Do not fall for the lies the Dems will tell. Obama does not “redistribute” wealth. I know that when the government taxes me, they are not redistributing anything. Because to say that means that you agree that the money was distributed to you or me in the first place. We EARN our money, it is not distributed to us. This is the first line I always take in an argument with a Lib/Dem/Socialist.
If Matthews wants proof of who his idol Obama really is, he needs to understand the “You didn’t build that” comment. That one little statement speaks volumes and tells us who he and the Dems really are. They want and need people to believe that their success is due to the government. That way, Obama and the Dems have the justification they need to steal it all and buy votes with it. If we earn our money through hard work and our own efforts to be successful they have no moral claim to it. But, if they can make enough people believe that the PUBLIC sector is responsible for it, then they can get away with “all of the money and success belongs to everyone”. Which gives them the justification they need to steal it all to perpetuate their power.
I think he went to some Protestant church down there (at least for a holiday or something) that many presidents have attended.
There is nothing in his freaky liberalism that would indicate a real belief in Islam, and nobody can tell me his wife doesn;t love pork.
I agree, though they are not the only ones using him to advance an agenda. While he rose as a communist agitator, he was eventually forced to endorse things that I’m sure he would rather not (troop surge in Afghanistan, gays issues (military, “marriage”).
He was useful tool for people who hid behind his “blackness” (as he did); it would have been much harder for a white person to push this crap.
I doubt he could care less about the Palestinians in general; he didn’t bow to their guy. He is supportive of anyone who opposes America, and the Palestinians are mild in that compared to Iran (they raise a lot of money here).
I wouldn’t disagree with that. Thanks for the response.
The link below, will somewhat give you an idea of what I think of Barack Owebama: The name Stalin conjures an image of ‘Big Brother’ - a cold, calculating yet ultimately paranoid tyrant never seen but seeing everything in an Orwellian world of terror, (corruption, extortion), and betrayal. A gross oversimplification, to be sure, but with its roots in the reality of the Man of Steel’s shadowy life and times.
Following the Communist Manifesto, sociopaths just like Owebama have offed about 50 million human beings. 14.5 million of them needlessly starved to death on their own food producing farms. Even though I don’t think freedom loving Americans will ever let this happen...Owebama is sorely intent destroying our country and then ‘changing’ it into something he likes more than our Constitution for danged sure. And if he’s re-elected, unleashed and unaccountable to voters, it could get really ugly here for our children. Something I never would have thought my children would see on the homeland, much less have to fight for.
He didn’t bow to Abbas because Abbas is hated by the CAIR types as a sellout. If he had met Nasrallah [sp?] he would have bowed.