Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In other words, mainstream Sunni Islam does not regard reason as a legitimate basis upon which to discern morality or to choose religion. Mohammed al-Ghazali (1058-1111 AD), considered by many Muslims to be next only to Mohammed in importance, said that reason can only know self-interest. He also advised that "the mind, which, once it testifies to the truthfulness of the prophet, must cease to act." If reason cannot independently know right from wrong, how could it be trusted to know true religion from false? Integrity of reason is essential to freedom of conscience. Without it, conscience means nothing – which is why so many Muslims view conversion from Islam as, necessarily, an act of perversion which should be punished.

The inviolability of conscience has as its ultimate source the idea of man as created in the image and likeness of God. That image includes reason's ability to come to know the truth and of the will’s capacity to choose it freely. In Islam, it is blasphemous to say that man is made in the image and likeness of God. Therefore, the notion of inalienable rights is alien to it.

Ultimately, respect for other religions is not based on the content of those religions, as those who hold one religion must of necessity consider the others false or wanting in some way. It is based upon respect for human beings in so far as they possess inalienable rights, especially freedom of conscience. This understanding helps us to appreciate why, within Islam, the denigration of other religions is standard fare, and why it would not naturally occur to many Muslims that this would be a problem. And that, in itself, is a problem with which we must come to grips by something other than our own apologies.

Robert R. Reilly is a member of the board of the Middle East Media Research Institute and the author of The Closing of the Muslim Mind.

1 posted on 10/12/2012 9:57:21 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

This is indispensible for understanding Islam and why it cannot co-exist with other religions.


2 posted on 10/12/2012 10:04:09 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (searching for something meaningful to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Excellent perspective article - thanks for posting.


3 posted on 10/12/2012 10:08:40 AM PDT by jagusafr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Bump


4 posted on 10/12/2012 10:13:16 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o
This is the same question Pope Benedict XVI addressed in his famous Regensburg Lecture in 2006: is there an element of "reason" within Islam, which would serve as a basis for mutual respect (not universal acceptance of others' beliefs, but respect for others as persons)?

Is there any faction within Islam --- any school of thought, any historic or present spokesman, any saint, maverick or sect --- who would endorse reason as a fundamental value?

7 posted on 10/12/2012 10:17:48 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o
I emphasize that personally I see a difference between Muslim and Islamist.

The principle of Islamic jurisprudence is: “reason is not a legislator.” . . . mainstream Sunni Islam does not regard reason as a legitimate basis upon which to discern morality. . . reason can only know self-interest . . . "the mind, which, once it testifies to the truthfulness of the prophet, must cease to act."

Islamists have used a centuries-old practice to accomplihs this; to wit,

Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels studies the effects of Islamist inbreeding:

"If there are two things that characterize Islamic culture, they are terrorism and inbreeding. The latest research shows that these two things might be closely connected . . . First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations. Such marriages increase the risk of negative mental and physical consequences . . . Risk of mental retardation increases with 400 percent (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 “Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation”). Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from blood related parents and that abilities related to social behavior and empathy develops slower in inbred babies (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 “Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children” [pdf]). Such facts might make several pieces fall into place for many people . . . People with low intelligence (because of inbreeding) might also be easier to brainwash with fundamentalist Islam. "

My emphasis.

9 posted on 10/12/2012 10:51:25 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

10 posted on 10/12/2012 11:15:03 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson