posted on 10/12/2012 7:59:21 PM PDT
I don’t think that, “Everyone knows Biden is full of **** anyway” is a good excuse for the Slimes not fact checking Biden too.
posted on 10/12/2012 8:03:54 PM PDT
(Sorry Algore. It was attitude, NOT altitude.)
I checked recently and found that the NY Times hasn’t endorsed the Republican nominee for President since 1956.So why should we be surprised by *anything they write,or fail to write.
posted on 10/12/2012 8:04:17 PM PDT
by Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
The CBO said the stimulus worked? That’s a bit beyond their competence. What definition of “jobs” are we using? Actually productive work, or work period?
posted on 10/12/2012 8:10:48 PM PDT
The nyt is tragic. (And my dog won’t even crap on it its so bad). Hopefully it will finish committing suicide and a more honest paper will replace it, soon.
Blowhard Joe, one heartbeat away from the presidency - if he can't even have a civil conversation with a political opponent from this country, what makes anyone think that he would be able to converse seriously with any world leader, especially one with whom he disagrees?
I'm just say'n.
posted on 10/12/2012 8:12:54 PM PDT
I would think zer0’s foreign policy expert would know that Syria is not even close to six times bigger, geographically, than Libya, which dwarfs Syria.
posted on 10/12/2012 8:28:27 PM PDT
(typical white person)
It's just a Democrat "mainstream" newsroom being, well... a Democrat "mainstream" newsroom - - like when the Associated Press Devoted 11 Reporters to "Fact Check" Sarah Palin's Book
after deliberately failing to investigate the background of the African communist the "news organization" helped push into the White House.
The New York Times is best ignored. Hopefully that thing will die soon.
James Taranto has written at Opinion Journal that this new-style media "fact checking" is "overwhelmingly biased toward the left" and "gives journalists much freer rein to express their opinions by allowing them to pretend to be rendering authoritative judgments about the facts." The Times's debate product doesn't refute Taranto's argument. Reporter Michael Cooper had the top "Check Point" item and per usual found the Republican at fault . . . .
The MSM employees are not fact checkers they are flak chuckers protecting their ideological kin; to wit, aged 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats who were celebrated in the establishment MSM back then as the most intelligent generation ever!. The geezers are now arguably that very establishment that praised them and they hold themselves and their ideological issue (MSM employees among them) in even higher regard.
posted on 10/12/2012 8:38:17 PM PDT
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
The “video versus 1st amendment” apologies belie the idea that Obama hasn’t apologized for American values overseas.
The NYT is full of bovine squeezings.
posted on 10/12/2012 8:51:41 PM PDT
(Laughter is the best medicine, especially when ridiculing your enemies.)
The NYT wouldn’t know facks if they bit ‘em in the @$$.
posted on 10/12/2012 8:57:04 PM PDT
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
posted on 10/13/2012 2:11:10 AM PDT
by Bon mots
(Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
With all the financial problems the New York Times is having I hope older editors are allowing young reporters to take money directly from the DNC directly for their work. No reason to ‘give it away’ if some John is willing to pay for it...
And they do need the money...
posted on 10/13/2012 2:15:46 AM PDT
(You only establish a feel for the line by having crossed it. - - Freeper One Name)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson