Skip to comments.Ex-CIA chief slams Biden for throwing U.S. spies under the bus during debate...
Posted on 10/13/2012 4:37:22 PM PDT by RummyChick
Two former intelligence chiefs today blasted Vice President Joe Biden for making the U.S. intelligence community a scapegoat for the inconsistent and shifting response of the Obama Administration.
Michael Hayden, former CIA director, and Michael Chertoff, who served as Homeland Security chief, hit out after Biden stunned many in the intelligence community by insisting that the U.S. consulate in Benghazi did not ask for additional security before it was attacked on September 11 - directly contradicting what security officials and diplomats have testified under oath.
The tough joint statement was issued via the Romney campaign. In it they added: Blaming those who put their lives on the line is not the kind of leadership this country needs.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
It’s becoming increasingly clear that under the Obama bus is the only honorable place to be. If you’re not there, there’s something wrong with you.
Don’t know but we always thought that the Secret Service were more professional.... at least that was the impression.
Maybe the Congress knows that it would never get any where in the Senate. They would just give O a big ole blubbery kiss like Clinton’s Senate did. It seemed to validate Clinton’s behaviour...and could do the same with O.
That being said...if by some horrible twist of fate O is reelected but we get control of the Senate and keep control of the House...it will be time to ROLL!!!
I hold this idiot responsible for TSA’s naked xray/hand rape program of Americans at the airports. The money grubbing pervert can KMA.
He can be as big a jerk as he wants to be... the MSM pass is ready...
Had Biden pulled down his pants and sh*t on the stage during the debate, the MSM would have called it 'assertive'.
I hope the DNC is paying them what they're worth.
Hmmm, maybe where was suppose to be a protest at Bangazi, and the ambassador was not suppose to be there. The bad guys heard about the “protest” and hi-jacked it, so much so that the “protesters” were afraid to show up. An undercover operation gone bad. That is about the only thing that would explain the facts we have before us. And why the administration stuck to the protest story for so long.
Saw Cheney on FOX the other day - made it clear that the Admin is both telling fibs and exhibiting incompetence.
Has anyone said where Obama was at 3:30 p.m. on 9/11?
In fact, I want to know where everyone was from 3:30 pm to 9:30 pm--Obama,Biden,Clinton, Rice, Kennedy, Lamb, Petraeus, Panetta and WTF they were doing while there was a six hour firefight in Benghazi in the two compounds.
.Let the chips fall where they may--I have had enough this crap.
If someones new home is Ft.Leavenworth, SO BE IT!
Hmmm, maybe where was suppose to be a protest at Bangazi, and the ambassador was not suppose to be there. The bad guys heard about the protest and hi-jacked it, so much so that the protesters were afraid to show up. An undercover operation gone bad. That is about the only thing that would explain the facts we have before us. And why the administration stuck to the protest story for so long.
The protests around the world were engineered and most of the participants had never seen the “movie” anyway. From what I’ve read, on Sept. 11 it only had something like 10,000 views. It was uploaded to youtube by some Egyptian Muslim. It was created no doubt with at the very least the US administration’s knowledge and very likely more. Some protesters (quote unquote) were hired, here and there. There was no spotaneous outburst of rage against some faux “movie” no one had seen.
IMHO Hitlery and 0moslem were hoping they could pin the attack on a protest and knew well in advance what was going to happen. Then they could trot out “bad, bad movie” to help bring in “no insulting Islam” as a US law.