Someone made this comment on the WAPO—
“”Petraeus is probably lying low because he does not want to be quoted on what the Benghazi mess really was: A successful terrorist attack against the US planned and organized by al Qaeda.
Additionally, he’s probably embarrassed that the cover for a CIA operation was blown, rendering the well-prepared facility useless for further intel activities. He’ll not want to confront the obvious question: If the CIA had so many folks in Benghazi tracking weapons and bad actors, why did they not detect any of the planning for the attack on the consulate?
So Petraeus and the CIA have plenty of reasons to avoid the limelight.””
We know there is at least one whistle-blower, and who knows how many tapes; surveillance, drone, and perhaps real-time. Issa was concerned that MSM would get their hands on video before he did.
If CNN had the diary and WaPo the itinerary, maybe MSM already has some footage.
What a SNAFU!