Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security increase for 2013 could be lowest since 1975 (Obama's policies at work)
fox news ^ | 10/14/2012 | ap

Posted on 10/14/2012 6:44:48 AM PDT by tobyhill

Social Security recipients shouldn't expect a big increase in monthly benefits come January.

Preliminary figures show the annual benefit boost will be between 1 percent and 2 percent, which would be among the lowest since automatic adjustments were adopted in 1975.

Monthly benefits for retired workers now average $1,237, meaning the typical retiree can expect a raise of between $12 and $24 a month.

The size of the increase will be made official Tuesday, when the government releases inflation figures for September. The announcement is unlikely to please a big block of voters -- 56 million people get benefits -- just three weeks before elections for president and Congress.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 10/14/2012 6:44:51 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

What is the basis for any increases at all?


2 posted on 10/14/2012 6:47:47 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Diseases desperate grown are by desperate appliance relieved or not at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble; tobyhill

It’s a COLA. This assumes old people don’t eat or drive.

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-10-12/inflation


3 posted on 10/14/2012 6:50:44 AM PDT by Perdogg (Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Monthly benefits for retired workers now average $1,237, meaning the typical retiree can expect a raise of between $12 and $24 a month.

As someone who depends (not totally) on SS retirement benefits, I see no reason why there should be any increase at all in light of the condition of the system.

4 posted on 10/14/2012 6:51:07 AM PDT by Roccus (POLITICIAN...............a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
It's to buy votes.
5 posted on 10/14/2012 6:51:46 AM PDT by tobyhill (Obamacare, the final nail in the US coffin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
COLA or Cost Of Living Adjustment. Supposedly you are suppose raise or lower the amount of the SS payment by the inflation rate. So a 2% inflation would equal a 2% raise in the payment.

But the US government likes to play games with the numbers.

6 posted on 10/14/2012 6:53:31 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Fate plays chess and you don't find out until too late that he's been using two queens all along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

We don’t know if Medicare Part B is going to chew this up.


7 posted on 10/14/2012 6:54:32 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

We already had two years of that ~ subsequently the government has dramatically increased the money supply ~ some think there’s some lurking inflation in that ~ maybe not. In either case an adjustment for cost of living doesn’t put more real value in your pocket.


8 posted on 10/14/2012 7:00:22 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
How about the IRS Interest rate which is determined quarterly and is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percent. Interest is compounded daily. Currently the Short-Term Rate for Oct-2012 is 0.23%. So 0.23 plus 3.0 = 3.23%.

SS has an increase between 1 percent and 2 percent, while the IRS charges twice as high a rate!

9 posted on 10/14/2012 7:14:05 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Exactly. We have a none growing, inflation induced economy.
10 posted on 10/14/2012 7:14:25 AM PDT by tobyhill (Obamacare, the final nail in the US coffin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

There was no increase in COLA in 2010 and 2011.


11 posted on 10/14/2012 7:15:17 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
I see no reason why there should be any increase at all in light of the condition of the system.

there were no increases during the previous two years.............did the condition of the system improve? Didn't think so.............

12 posted on 10/14/2012 7:20:05 AM PDT by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“”We don’t know if Medicare Part B is going to chew this up.””

It always does, I think. No COLA, no increase in Part B. When they do increase it, Part B goes up accordingly.

Like someone here said, we don’t eat or drive!!


13 posted on 10/14/2012 7:31:49 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Well, it makes sense that there would be little to no raise is SS benefits.

The price of luxury cars and boats is down, along with expensive 2nd homes. A new Ipad costs less than the first computers. Wages for maids and butlers is flat or falling.

These are the things seniors spend their money on, not food, fuel, and medical bills, all of which are skyrocketing./ Sarc.

14 posted on 10/14/2012 7:34:23 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

My last COLA was $32. Part be took 1/3.


15 posted on 10/14/2012 7:40:36 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
While the federal government is dumping hundreds of billions of dollars down every hole it can find adding a few dollars to the old folks budget bothers me not the least.

I'd rather my tax dollars help support some SS recipient here than fill the bank accounts of terrorists in the Middle East.

16 posted on 10/14/2012 7:40:51 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varon
did the condition of the system improve? Didn't think so.............

Oh, I see how it's supposed to work now. Get WHAT you can WHILE you can and to hell with everybody else.

Thanks, I now change my opinion to, "GIMME ME MORE MONEY!!!"

Again, thanks for setting me straight.

17 posted on 10/14/2012 7:50:44 AM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Social Security increase for 2013 could be lowest since 1975 (Obama's policies at work)

I woke up late this morning and I blame Obama for that too.

Seriously, unless changed by Congress the COLA is automatic based on the change in the July-September average CPI from the previous year's 3rd quarter. It went up 6% in January 2009 because of the spike in gasoline and natural gas prices the previous summer. Then once that spike went down there was a decrease in CPI for the 3rd quarter 2009 so no COLA in 2010. The CPI in 3rd quarter of 2010 went up, but not to 2008 levels so no COLA in 2011 either.

You can argue with whether the CPI accurately measures inflation, but Obama has no direct effect on the SS COLA.

18 posted on 10/14/2012 7:51:16 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Big Bird is a brood parasite: laid in our nest 43 years ago and we are still feeding him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
What is the basis for any increases at all?

To keep people who went on it, after paying in their working lives, 25 years ago from trying to subsist on 1985 monies in a 2012 cost-of-living? Much as it should have never been put in place, the fact is that folks bought into the gov't pogrom and are now stuck with it unless they still have some working years to change venues.

19 posted on 10/14/2012 7:54:05 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I’ll buy more ammo with mine!


20 posted on 10/14/2012 8:04:24 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson