Sounds WAY MORE plausible than any of the stories the White Hut is putting out.
The libs always thought Reagan won by doing something similar. It was a lie, of course, but as much as they like projecting I can easily believe the gist of your theory.
Not stellar writing, but you know what? Your scenario is ABUNDANTLY believable and makes the most logical sense to this twisted imbroglio that I have seen so far.
Obama likes complex, covert treachery that promptly runs aground —a liberal Nixon, but super dumb.
FITS HIS M.O. LIKE A GLOVE...!
My "dream" scenario .... Seal Team 6 perp walking Obama & The Mooch out of the White House
Great job - completely fits all the hard data we have, and fits this egotistical admin to a “T”.
I guess we’ll find out in a few weeks whether the above is true. Any administration that would attempt so crazy a plan will do something equally crazy as exigency demands. (Lotta’ slippage in their vote count these days)Then again they seem to have armed foaming crazies in Mexico as a means of attacking our own Constitution...so...
That’s the only cogent and consistent opinion as to what really happened over there that I have read. I am sorry to say you are probably right.
I can’t find any legitimate reason why our embassy wasn’t secure. There is no reasonable reason I can come up with.
It’s 9/11 anniversary in Libya. Why on that day, or on ANY day, would we not have Marines guarding our embassy?
Your theory is easy to prove.
Look for a series of questionable single gunshot wound suicides and single engine aircraft accidents involving people in a position to know the truth.
To complex and fragile to be real
From savior/negotiator to betrayer/deceiver.
Whether there was a promise or not I'm sure Morsi was disappointed.
There were LOTS of Muzzies at the DNC convention (probably because of Obama's stance on this issue and they voted "NO!" at the convention.
I still think THIS video had something to do with the terrorist attack in Benghazi.
This would definitely offer additional support for why Obama went to bed, thinking he knew exactly where the “missing” ambassador was.
Think Iran 1979....A U.S. Ambassador with no security detail? Highly unlikely..For anyone who served in Southeast Asia.. has either been part of the security detail or interacted with said details.
This was a setup designed to provide cover. Personal opinion...2 former S.E.A.L.’s were the flies in the ointment.
The WH was not surprised of the U.S. Consulate attack! No Presser by Present Obama....curious..
The sacrificial terrorists were provided weapons and were more likely convinced of the fact there would be no resistance. Hence, once the 2 former S.E.A.L.’s Donerty and Woods intervened, well...the situation escalated way beyond the original plans.
This would mean that the primary allies in the re-election efforts of a sitting US Preident was AL QAEDA.
Who was the security guy who said, “the Taliban is inside the building”...?
Now I know PERFECTLY how he felt and why.
You see the Congressional testimony? When asked how many surface to air (I thought shoulder-mounted) missles, the State Dept guy said something like, "10,000 to 20,000". Eerie. No one picked that one up.
Good scenerio. I wonder what our Ambassador and important security documents were doing in Bengahzi with little security at less than standard accomodations in an area that everyone else (UN, Brits) were bugging out.
Another scenerio: An AQ attack on a CIA operation with the Ambassador as collateral damage? (The Libs despise the CIA)
This scenario is very believable for many reasons. Just two that come to mind are:
1) that leftists would manipulate, connive, lie and distort for the purpose of political gain
2) that the only thing these leftists are ultimately capable of, when they try to manipulate circumstances involving elements of military intelligence, is to completely screw up their own plan
It’s as if they had Valerie Jarrett running things.
Thank you Kozy, this sure makes more sense than anything we have heard.
A much simpler explanation is that Libya (Obama War) was suppose to show case his great expertise in foreign affairs. Consequently Obama seeking not to offend the Libyans did not want a large security foot print at our installations in Libya. Libya was suppose to be a great success for Obama not another problem for the USA in a very problem prone part of the world. As we now know it all blew up in Obamas' face. And he is desperately looking for something or someone to blame. My take fixes the facts and is much simpler to understand. :)
Now I absolutely understand how and why he Bengazi assault was led by a radical who was released from Gitmo —clearly this plan wasn’t hatched and executed on-the-fly; that nut was released for a very specific reason and his REAL boss was and possibly even IS NOW Vallerie Jarrett.