Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kozy

This sounds plausable, more so than whatever else is circulating. Except for a few glitches. I don’t understand how a known exchange, a proof of dealing with terrorists, would come close to guaranteeing his re-election. Reagan’s deal wasn’t described as Arms for Hostages until well after he became president. Who would believe that Obammy struck fear into the hearts of the enemy? Secondly, the timing is far too obvious, especially now that most of the facts are known by those who really wanted to know the fact. Third, what are the chances that Stevens was brought into this “surprise” and acquiesced? How reliable would his actions have been if he had NOT been brought into the picture? And who in this administration would have dared expose him (and his preferences) to the homophobes in Libya and thus to the American media? Lastly, the two Navy Seals could have been “handled” and apparently were.

As to a different surprise? Too late and too obvious.


62 posted on 10/14/2012 10:06:18 AM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mach9
I can't see Obama handing over the blind sheik before the election. Of course the mainstream medi would be effusive in their praise for such a deal, but it wouldn't go over with ordinary Americans, and both sides are trying to get as many independents as possible.

After the election, he will have more flexibility.

76 posted on 10/14/2012 10:50:23 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson