Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National GOP establishment lavishly funding liberal homosexual activist Richard Tisei for Congress
MassResistance.org ^ | October 14, 2012 | Unknown

Posted on 10/14/2012 12:43:34 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

 

National GOP establishment lavishly funding liberal homosexual activist Richard Tisei for Congress in Massachusetts.

Has long record of outrageous activity.

Is this a warning where the Republican Party will go in the next few years?

POSTED: October 14, 2012

The Republican establishment in Washington is pouring enormous amounts of money -- over a million dollars -- into Massachusetts to elect an aggressive, anti-family homosexual activist to Congress.

In Massachusetts, Richard Tisei is known as an openly "gay" liberal Republican politician who ran for Lt. Governor in 2010. Prior to that as a State Senator, among other things he worked to successfully block the people's right to vote on the Marriage Amendment.

Salute to his "community." Advertising in the Boston "Gay Pride Week" official program in 2010.

Tisei is the only Republican Congressional candidate in Massachusetts to receive such support from the national Republican Congressional campaign!

Flood of expensive TV ads

Anyone watching TV in Massachusetts has undoubtedly seen a flood of television ads which support just one particular Republican challenger, Richard Tisei, mostly through attacks on the Democratic incumbent, Rep. John Tierney (6th District). The ads are impossible to miss, and easily dwarf all the TV spending for Republicans in all the other Congressional districts in the state.

The Republican National Congressional Committee (RNCC) has picked Tisei to be one of their so-called "Young Guns," an elite group of 30 US House challengers being touted as "the new generation of right-wing House Republicans who are looking to put their conservative stamp on Washington." (We're not making this up.)

The RNCC and its super PAC Young Guns Action Fund have already spent nearly a million dollars for hundreds of 30-second ads on behalf of Tisei, and many more are planned.

How radical is Richard Tisei?

Tisei is both fiscally and socially liberal. His political views and record in the Massachusetts Legislature include:

  • High taxes. Has refused to sign Grover Norquist's pledge that he would not raise taxes if elected to Congress. In Mass. Legislature, Tisei voted against several bills to reduce taxes, earning him the wrath of Citizens for Limited Taxation. Tisei was the only State Senate Republican who voted against the tax rollback in May 2000.
  • Abortion. Strongly supports abortion. Rated 100% by NARAL and 100% by Planned Parenthood.
  • Abortion buffer zone. Co-sponsored the bill that expanded the buffer zone around abortion clinics.
  • Hostile to religious faith. Co-sponsored the "emergency contraception bill" in 2005 (vetoed by Gov. Mitt Romney because it would force Catholic hospital workers to act against their faith).
  • Gay activist. "Came out" as a homosexual in 2010 and has proudly and publicly embraced the homosexual lifestyle. Prior to that he pushed its agenda supporting a range of bills and legislative actions, working with activists and the homosexual lobby. Has since appeared in numerous homosexual newspapers and magazines. Marched in 2010 Gay Pride parade (see news video).



    Fellow marchers in the 2010 Boston Gay Pride Parade
    [MassResistance photos]


  • Gay marriage. Passionately supports same-sex "marriage". He brags that he fought to make it "legal" in Massachusetts. Believes it's a civil right that must be granted across America. (See excerpt from radio interview, below.) Tisei may "marry" his male partner after Election Day, reports the Washington Post.
  • Stopped Marriage Amendment vote in Massachusetts in 2007. As part of the leadership in the legislature, fought successfully NOT to let the people of Massachusetts vote on the Marriage Amendment. Bragged in homosexual magazine that "The margin of victory [to deny the vote] was provided by Republicans," and he took the lead in pressuring and persuading them.
  • Helped to spread "gay marriage" across the U.S. with his vote to repeal "1913 Law" (in 2008). That law had barred out-of-state same-sex couples from "marrying" in Massachusetts if those "marriages" were not recognized as legal in their home states.
  • Gay propagandist. Appeared in slick pro-homosexual "marriage" propaganda video produced by the homosexual lobby group MassEquality to persuade legislators to block the Marriage Amendment. Includes a number of questionable (i.e., phony) statistics.
  • Actively works to move the Republican party leftward on "gay rights." Told homosexual newspaper ""What I would say to people is that we will never have true equality unless we have strong voices and allies speaking out for fairness from both sides of the aisle."

    As the Washington Post reported: "Tisei takes an evolutionary rather than revolutionary approach to gay rights and the congressional agenda. 'If I'm in the [Republican] caucus, people are going to see me, they're going to get to know me. Just the fact that I'm there, is going to make a lot of people question, or think about the issue differently. Rather than poking somebody in the eye, the best way to deal with it is to let them evolve. I've seen all kinds of people, Democrats and Republicans, change their opinions of it over time.'"
  • "Transgender Rights" bill. Was lone Republican co-sponsor of radical Transgender Rights and Hate Crimes Law when first filed. The bill (passed in 2011) forces businesses, schools, and government to accept cross-dressing and transsexuality or face punishment. Was a strong proponent and helped develop the strategy (i.e., "this is an anti-discrimination bill") to get it passed.

    A group of men march in support of Tisei's "Transgender Rights" bill in 2008.
    [Mass-
    Resistance photo]


  • Supports homosexual agenda in schools. Told homosexual newspaper that if elected to Lt. Governor he would "work very closely with" the dreaded state-funded Commission on GLBT Youth -- which spends public money implementing homosexual programs in the public schools and supports gay-bisexual-transgender clubs for kids both on and off campus.
  • Turncoat Republican. Tisei told National Public Radio: "When Gov. Romney was here, I voted with him half the time, and I voted against him half the time. ... I have no problem working with Nancy Pelosi. Just because she's in the opposition, I'm not gonna poke her in the eye."

Well-known homosexual activists Tom Lang (left) and his "husband" Alex Westerhoff campaigning for Tisei and Baker in 2010.

Tisei believes that "gay marriage" is inevitable in America, and he plans to fight hard to make that happen sooner rather than later. He compares it to interracial marriage, and says that court decisions and laws are necessary -- that people should not be allowed to vote on it. In May, Tisei and national homosexual activist Jarrett Barrios were interviewed on Boston's National Public Radio affiliate.

Here's what Tisei told NPR about gay marriage taking over America:

"I look at this as more in a historical perspective. This is the same situation that popped up with interracial marriage in 1948 in California; a very controversial court decision there and California became the first state to legalize interracial marriage. It took a while for the rest of the country to catch up. State by state you saw a change, until finally the Supreme Court some 20-something years later with a decision that banning interracial marriage in the United States was unconstitutional.

"I kind of look at this situation we're on as pretty much on the same track...I think you need both the legislature. . . AND you need the courts. This isn't going to happen overnight, but look at the progress that's been made already since Massachusetts became the first state in the country to legalize gay marriage."

Listen to the NPR Tisei interview HERE:
(Part of larger show about Obama's "gay marriage" support.)

Tisei Interview

Link to the entire NPR broadcast HERE.

You can be sure that Tisei will vote to repeal DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) if he's elected to Congress.

And the Republican establishment considers him a "conservative"? Most Republicans would see a Richard Tisei as the exact opposite of anyone they would support, much less someone the Republican establishment would spend enormous funds to elect to Congress. He does not appear to agree much with the Republican Party Platform, to say the least.



Richard Tisei on the front page of the Boston homosexual newspaper Bay Windows in 2010.

What is the Republican "Young Guns" program?

The "Young Guns" program was by started by Congressman Paul Ryan (the current GOP VP Candidate) along with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and Republican House Whip Kevin McCarthy of California. It was basically sold as a strategy to raise money to support a select group of aggressive, conservative challengers in winnable Congressional races, and nurture them to victory. In 2009 it became part of the National Republican Congressional Committee and helped in the 2010 GOP takeover of the House.

The term "Young Guns" originally came from an October 2007 article in The Weekly Standard. In 2010 Ryan, Cantor, and McCarthy wrote a book about the idea.

Their media image of the "Young Guns" has been well crafted. As pointed out above, the group is regularly described as "a new generation of right-wing House Republicans who are looking to put their conservative stamp on Washington."

But behind the scenes, it's another picture entirely. As the Washington Post reports:

Republican leaders are actively helping Tisei's campaign, and they promise that his sexual orientation and his liberal views on gay marriage and abortion rights would not make him an outcast in their conservative caucus.

"We all came here from somewhere. It is the opportunity that drew us here, and he will have every bit of opportunity, as an openly gay Republican, as any other Republican," House Majority Leader Eric I. Cantor (R-Va.) said. "I told him, we're fully behind him. I'm supportive of his candidacy and look forward to serving with him."

Super PAC is formed

In 2011, the Young Guns Action Fund super PAC (YG Action Fund) was formed to raise the big money for the 2012 election and take some of the burden off the RNCC. This past April, billionaire Sheldon Adelson (who had earlier given millions to the Gingrich campaign) gave $5 million to the YG Action Fund and they were off and running, and raising more money from other wealthy Republican donors. This year there are 30 "young gun" candidates selected for their hardcore support, including Tisei, who has already received over a million dollars from the YG Action Fund, and thus appears to be getting a particularly large share of the money.

Banner on the Young Guns Action Fund Facebook page. Note the word "conservative."

Why are Congressional leaders supporting Tisei? Strange answers.

Of all the Congressional races across the country (and across Massachusetts) why pick this one? And why Tisei of all candidates, who is loathed by the conservative base and is running against an entrenched incumbent? Why not pick a race like the 4th District that's an open seat (with Barney Frank retiring)? How did these decisions get made?

It's very difficult to get any answers on this. Nobody at the RNCC would talk to us, despite numerous attempts by telephone and email.



From the NRCC's "Young Guns" website.


The most prominent "Young Guns" staffer quoted in the media is Brad Dayspring, a former deputy chief of staff to Eric Cantor. Dayspring recently told Commonwealth Magazine, “Richard Tisei is a next generation, live-and-let-live Republican and someone that the people of Massachusetts can be proud of."

We finally reached by Dayspring by phone this week. This was our conversation with him:

We started out listing the multitude of problems with Tisei and asked Dayspring why they were supporting him. "He is the most conservative candidate running in the 6th District," he told us.

But Tisei is the only Republican in that race, we said. Dayspring simply repeated: "He is the most conservative candidate running in the 6th District."

But what about the other districts, we asked? What about the 4th District, with Sean Bielat. It's an open seat and Bielat got 45% last time against Barney Frank. What about the 5th District, with Jon Golnik polling very well against Nikki Tsongas? Why not support them? Dayspring simply repeated, "Tisei is the most conservative candidate running in the 6th District."

Then he added, "There are no other competitive districts in Massachusetts." With the Obama voters coming out in force, he said, "to support anyone else in Massachusetts would be a fool's errand." When we started to rebut that, he interrupted, "Have you seen any Republican prognosticators that say any other races in Massachusetts are competitive?" We admitted we hadn't consulted prognosticators.

"We are not in the business of throwing away money," Dayspring stated. And that was that. His attitude had become quite condescending. And it's a bit maddening to try to argue with that kind of logic, so we thanked him for his time and ended the call.

Pushing hard for Tisei

Besides the flood of lavish, expensive television ads, Tisei gets other red-carpet treatment from the "Young Guns" group. He gets lots of PR publicity, including TV interviews on major networks and media outlets. And in Tisei's case, it works like a charm. It's the only time you'll ever see ABC, CNN, and the Huffington Post gush over a Republican.

House Speaker John Boehner, flanked by Congressmen Kevin McCarthy (left) and Eric Cantor (right) appear on CNN piece highlighting Richard Tisei. Watch VIDEO here.


Also see: VIDEO: Richard Tisei on ABC News

And of course, there have been various swank DC fundraising events. This past Tuesday, Oct. 9, House Speaker John Boehner personally spent the morning raising money for Tisei. The average GOP Congressional candidate can only dream of that.

From a Tierney ad: Invitation by Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor, and others to fundraising event for Tisei (note top billing) and other "Young Guns."


The push for Tisei, of course, includes the cooperation of the Massachusetts State Republican Party, which cleared the way for him to get the early money without the distraction and delay of a primary. In 2010, Bill Hudak, a charismatic local attorney, ran in that district and got 43% of the vote against Tierney. Hudak planned to run again this time and thus would have been in a primary against Tisei. But the state party establishment pressured Hudak to drop out before the primary so Tisei could have a clear run. In our opinion, that was pretty low.

(Finally, this is sadly not the first time this has happened. In 2010, Tisei was running for Lt. Governor as running mate to Charlie Baker, who described himself as "to the left of Obama on social issues." Louisiana Governor Haley Barbour, who claims to be a conservative, used his Republican Governor's Association group to pour over $2 million for attack ads against Baker and Tisei's opponents. It didn't work; Baker and Tisei still lost.)

A gush of major "gay Republican" money for Tisei

If that's not enough, the Republican "gay money machine" is gearing up for Tisei. As the Washington Post reported on Sept. 29:

The Tisei campaign has also become a rallying point for a cluster of wealthy Republican donors who support gay rights and would like to see the party move away from some of its recent harsh rhetoric on the issue.

Tisei has the financial backing of some of the most prominent gay conservatives, including Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal, and Ken Mehlman, the former Republican National Committee chairman. Mehlman, now a private-equity executive, hosted a New York fundraiser for Tisei. A new super PAC supporting Republicans who approve of gay marriage — with financial backing from billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Singer — may enter the Tisei race in a few weeks.

Conclusion

Ladies and gentlemen, this is your 2012 National Republican party. Diversity is much more important than conservative principles. Maybe they think that if unprincipled Republicans get elected, the liberals and the media (and their mushy RINO donors) will like them all better. The bottom line is that it's down to the same old thing: money and power. They can pretend to be conservative for the hoi polloi, but they're much too "refined" to actually hold to those principles. The YG Action Fund spokesman made that pretty clear to us. And this will only be exacerbated among the Republicans under a Romney administration, we fear.

Unfortunately, in the long run everybody on the right suffers from this kind of strategy. It's very shortsighted. Without principles and real fortitude, nothing else in politics works for very long. That's pretty much what happened back in 2006, isn't it?

As a Congressman, Tisei will do exactly what he did in the Massachusetts Legislature: be an aggressive fifth columnist for the radical homosexual and abortion movement, terrible on taxes, and work tirelessly to move the party to the left. None of that seems to matter to the establishment Republicans.

We remember hearing how hard it was to get conservative principles into the National Republican Party Platform at the convention in Tampa this year. It was only through sheer perseverance by conservatives that it worked out. The RINOs there had tried to stack the deck, we were told, to create a much more watered down document. Tisei shows us exactly where the RINOs hope to take the party.

But we'll say one thing for Richard Tisei. He doesn't hide what he believes or what his goals are. From that perspective, he's probably the only honest one in the whole bunch. Maybe the only one there with "principles."

What you can do

Although the "Citizens United" Supreme Court decision has given much more influence to wealthy donors, the Party elite still cannot ignore the average person.

We think it would be useful to contact the Republican National Congressional Committee either by phone or email and let them know why you will never give them a penny. We believe it's very important for them to hear that from a lot of angry people.

Beyond that, give generously to individual CANDIDATES. But don't give any money the Republican Party or PACs connected with them. This is a widespread problem, trust us. In any case, you'll never be able to compete with the millionaires who seem to control things within the Party establishment.

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; ma2012; rinos; rnc; romney; romneytruthfile; tisei
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: SoConPubbie

This is definitely a sign of things to come in the GOP.

If Romney wins, — which of course would be a happy change from Obama, — the GOP will take it as an object lesson that centrism (defined as socially liberal fiscally restrained opportunism) wins generally. Expect more queers come out of the woodwork and be enthusiastically supported by the GOP.


41 posted on 10/14/2012 8:00:28 PM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Romney and Ryan have both said they are fine with a sodomized military and will do nothing to change it.
Of course, Mitt has always been a homo hugger.


42 posted on 10/14/2012 8:07:29 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Im on board with most stuff posted here but, the anti-gay stuff is really over the top, don't you think? Sure, there are some real freaky gay people and you've certainly high-lighted some of them with your post but, you make it look like gay people are a threat to civilization. Really? Could you possibly be anymore paranoid? I don't think so.

Did you ever stop to consider that there are freaky people in any large group? Somewhere between 5-10% of the population is probably gay or at least bisexual. Ironically, it would probably be lower than that but, a certain segment of the people are gay simply because they enjoy annoying the hell out of people like you.

My advice is to vote against gay marriage and tone down your over-the-top warnings. I'm as heterosexual and as conservative as you, but, I also have both lesbian and gay friends. And even though they are mostly liberal and we debate constantly over their political naivete, I consider them all to be good people. You can be nice...really you can.

43 posted on 10/14/2012 8:16:16 PM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

So they want to evict 70% of the party because it is without a doubt that a supermajority of GOP are conservative on abortion and ssm. That is why the GOP is the stupid party. I had some idiot say we needed a firewall in places like MA? Really how does that work when we have some media darling GOP who is as likely to vote with liberal Dems as they are conservative GOP? Scott Brown has been a real disappointment. He could’ve led the way for a conservative awakening in MA but he chose not to lead.

See the left knows that coexisting won’t get them what they want which is why they actively try to force their beliefs on us or if not us our children. We had better realize that this isn’t a game where we can just split the difference and all will be well. What we see culturally and fiscally is the result of that attitude. We need to cling to our idelogical positions and sell them or we will find ourselves an endangered species.


44 posted on 10/14/2012 8:18:21 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Now lets return to our regular scheduled deprogramming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Im on board with most stuff posted here but, the anti-gay stuff is really over the top, don't you think? Sure, there are some real freaky gay people and you've certainly high-lighted some of them with your post but, you make it look like gay people are a threat to civilization. Really? Could you possibly be anymore paranoid? I don't think so.

Apparently, you are either not a Christian, or one who has not read the Bible much.

This site, as declared by Jim Robinson, it's owner and founder, is "As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty. "

God, through his Apostle Paul, defines the sin of Homosexuality as follows:

Romans 1:18-32

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Your argument isn't with me, where Homosexuality is concerned, it's with your Heavenly Father.

He defines Homosexuality as evil; there is not compromise with evil.

You'll have to decide which side you are on.

45 posted on 10/14/2012 9:42:48 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Your post describes you far better than it describes God-fearing Christians. God said sodomy was an abomination and He destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of their perversion. Think He forgot what He declared. Some of US know full well this nation has been blessed and protected and some of US would like to continue receiving those blessings and protection.

There is nothing gay about these perverts. They know it and they have NO shame. They are mentally unstable. Oh, there will be no sodomy in heaven.

46 posted on 10/14/2012 9:57:59 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Please help Todd Akin defeat Claire and the GOP-e send money!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
National GOP establishment lavishly funding liberal homosexual activist

but they and Willard cut off Conservatives like Akin


47 posted on 10/15/2012 1:03:41 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Look, I understand social conservatives we need to work with people who agree with us on national defense issues or fiscal issues.

Please try to understand that, from our perspective, homosexuality really **IS** a threat to civilization.

If you don't agree, I understand. Libertarianism proceeds from different principles than those which I hold, and while I can work with libertarians I understand we have different foundations for our beliefs which lead us to share many but not all of the same beliefs.

But please understand that I disagree, and disagree strongly, that homosexuality needs to be accepted as somebody’s personal choice.

48 posted on 10/15/2012 6:16:28 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The only recourse would be to vote for the demrat. Coprophiles should not be given power regardless of party or whatever boys organization they infiltrate.


49 posted on 10/15/2012 6:51:03 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; ...

Coprophiles should not be given power under any circumstance. You simply vote Demrat in this case.


50 posted on 10/15/2012 6:55:40 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

It’s hard to believe, but Tisei is not the worst RINO running for Congress. That honor belongs to Tom Tierney (no relation I know of to Tisei’s opponent). This guy’s platform is wealth redistribution. Source - Malden Observer. He’s running against Ed Markey. If you are in Markey’s district, blank the ballot for Congressman.


51 posted on 10/15/2012 10:36:14 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pedro45

Tisei may win because Tierney is so tarnished. But Katherine Clark will trounce him in 2014.


52 posted on 10/15/2012 10:39:37 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; All

After the election, it’s go time on taking out the Republican party as a party.

If Mr. Romney is elected, he NEEDS to feel more pressure than he ever dreamed of from the right.

The Republican party needs to be elected out of existence; one at a time in municipal and state elections.

A real conservative movement needs to start.


53 posted on 10/15/2012 10:47:23 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The problem is that conservatives have become a minority in this nation. Unfortunately, Christians too.

We don’t just need to take over the party. The nation itself needs to be ‘taken back.’


54 posted on 10/15/2012 12:45:44 PM PDT by Luircin (Don't like Romney? Blame the conservative circular firing squad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

Ping


55 posted on 10/15/2012 1:34:31 PM PDT by ElPatriota (The SILENCE of the Catholic Church in protecting our culture from perversion is ** DEAFENING **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

This is one of the main reasons I am no longer a Republican.


56 posted on 10/16/2012 8:33:35 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
Im on board with most stuff posted here but, the anti-gay stuff is really over the top, don't you think? Sure, there are some real freaky gay people and you've certainly high-lighted some of them with your post but, you make it look like gay people are a threat to civilization. Really? Could you possibly be anymore paranoid? I don't think so.

If you are going to espouse the absurd logic which premises the leftist meme of homophobia why not just come out of the closet and use the word homophobia?

As far as "gay people" -what actually defines this class of "gay people" you believe exists? Is there any scientific objective evidence to support your claim?

I would suggest that it is not some supposed people you think you nobly defend here but rather it is deviant and intrinsically self destructive sexual practices you defend. Is eating feces really as noble and socially redeeming as you seem to believe it is? -I think not!

57 posted on 10/16/2012 11:53:29 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Dude, that last line of your was just bizzare. You have way too much time on your hands.

In any case, I’m a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian. I don’t give a crap what people do with their lives as long as they pay for it with their own money and they don’t hurt anyone. I agree with you that some of peoples choices are offensive but, no one in this country (including you or me) has the right to never be offended.

My advice to you is to live the way you want to live and let others do the same.


58 posted on 10/17/2012 5:02:17 AM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman

Homosexuality is a threat to civilization:

http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

“I’m as heterosexual and as conservative as you, but, I also have both lesbian and gay friends. And even though they are mostly liberal and we debate constantly over their political naivete, I consider them all to be good people.”

You’ve been had. Your social liberalism is being taken advantage of.


59 posted on 10/17/2012 7:45:53 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman
In any case, I’m a fiscal conservative and a social libertarian.

REGARDLESS you conveniently ignore the fiscal reality of what homosexual sex normalcy promotion by government power costs taxpayers maybe you should stick with fiscal issues only on FR and save your acceptance and or promotion of homosexual sex normalcy for DU?

60 posted on 10/17/2012 11:28:53 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson