Skip to comments.Muslims protest 'age of mockery' as thousands descend on Google HQ [London]
Posted on 10/14/2012 1:36:26 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Protest outside Google HQ in Buckingham Palace Road organised by the Muslim Action Forum. Photo: GEOFF PUGH
A protest by 10,000 Muslims outside the offices of Google in London today is just the first in an orchestrated attempt to force the company to remove an anti-Islamic film from website YouTube in Britain.
Thousands had travelled from as far afield as Glasgow to take part in the demonstration,ahead of a planned million-strong march in Hyde Park in coming weeks.
....."Organisations like Google are key players and have to take responsibility for civility. You can't just say it doesn't matter that it's freedom of speech. It's anarchy."
Sheikh Siddiqui,a barrister from Nuneaton,said he wanted to form a coalition with the Church of England, Catholics, Jewish groups,Trade Unions and even Conservatives to encourage their ranks to join his "campaign for civility".
"We want everyone in society to recognise these people are wrecking our fragile global society....
As many as 800 imams in mosques across Britain helped to organise today's protest,which lasted four hours and blocked roads almost up to the Queen's doorstep on Buckingham Palace Road.
Muslims from Blackburn,Birmingham,Glasgow,Luton,Manchester and Peterborough were in attendance. When asked where where the women attending the protest were,one protester replied:"Right at the back".
Self-employed businessman Ahmed Nasar said he was worried the video could lead to violence in Britain in the same way as it had abroad."If you push people too far,"he said,"You will turn the peaceful elements into violence."
A YouTube spokesperson said:"We work hard to create a community everyone can enjoy and which also enables people to express different opinions.This can be a challenge because what's OK in one country can be offensive elsewhere. This video-which is widely available on the Web-is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube."
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
EVERYTHING P*ssses off these people.
Actually, that is a true statement.
That's newspeak (Orwell) for agreement with the totalitarian order. Soon we will need to start counting how many people are killed in the name of civility.
No, we don’t hate you or your demented prophet.
You just turn our stomach. Now, go jump in the sea.
They need to have their book banned as hate speech....
Gotta love it, they always revert to their mean.
Notice all the printed signs that go so well with their faux complaining.
Gee, got a lot to respect there...
Sorry, but I have no pity for your country's liberal leaning stupidity! How's that diversity working out for you? Idiots!
Without free speech they will never know why everybody laughs at them.
A word to Muslims..
We dont care if youre offended, and we never will. Get used to it.
Let’s not quibble over who hates who...
Let’s just ship them all back to the Middle East.
OMG! We are going to London in a few weeks and staying very close to Hyde Park!!! CRAP.
Why are these cave people on the net anyway? To watch porn , like mohammed would have?
Terrorism is that islam exists.
Get rid of it.
Good, that's when you machine-gun these Muslim vermin to flesh pulp.
Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists are mocked / made fun of all the time, but they don't go rabid-brained like these Kaaba-kissing, Mecca-circling bastards.
Tolerating Islamist intolerance
by KPS Gill
Crucially, it is precisely this tolerance of intolerance that has allowed vocal and violent radicalised Islamist minorities to silence Muslim majorities and to transform the global image of Islam into the grotesque parody of the faith that the Danish cartoons sought - perhaps indelicately - to reflect.
Offensive though these cartoons may have been - and they were not offensive to at least some Muslims, who saw in them, not an insult to the Prophet or the faith, but rather a critique of the unrelenting violence that has become the defining character of much of the Muslim world - the criminal incitement and calls to 'butcher/kill/behead those who insult Islam' have only reinforced the images the cartoons reflected, "allowing mass hysteria to define Islam's message".
What dishonours Islam more? A few irreverent cartoons? Or the acts of remorseless murder, of relentless violence against people of other faiths, of the intimidation and abuse of all other faiths and communities, which the Islamists - including states adhering to the Islamist ideology, such as Pakistan - routinely engage in? Why, then, does the Muslim world not rise up in rage against these fanatics and political opportunists who are bringing disgrace and disrepute to their faith? Why are the voices of criticism against extremist Islam and Islamist terrorism so muted?
Indeed, why is it that all occasional and invariably qualified criticism of these terrorists is accompanied by vague justifications of the need to 'understand root causes' and the 'hurt' caused to the 'Muslim psyche'? Is the 'Muslim psyche' uniquely susceptible to injury?
Venomous characterisations of Hindus, Jews, Christians and, generally, all kafirs, are the stock-in-trade of the discourse in some Muslim countries, often communicated through official media, such as national television channels. The ideologies of hatred against other faiths are systematically propagated in so many Muslim states - we in India are familiar with the Pakistani case, where school curricula routinely demonise non-Muslims.
And do the words or pictures or caricatures by non-Muslims do more injury to the 'Islamic world' than the hideous acts of terrorism that Islamists have been inflicting on non-Muslims - and, indeed, on so many Muslims - all over the world? Worse, after so many Muslim-majority states have simply wiped out their own minorities, or are, even today, in the process of doing so, these very states go shrieking around about 'hurting the sentiments of minorities' when something is said against Muslims or Islam.
Indeed, 'Islamic' states oppress even their own sectarian minorities - be they non-Wahabbi Sunnis in some cases, or Shia, Ismaili, Ahmadiya, or Sufi, in others - not only through systematic denial of elementary religious rights to these sects, but, as in the case of Pakistan, through state sponsored terrorist movements against such minorities - recall that the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan was set up by General Zia-ul-Haq to target Shias in the wake of the Iranian revolution, and continued to enjoy the support of the state under successor regimes, till it got mixed up with the Al Qaeda and anti-US terrorism, and lost its status as a sarkari (state supported) jihadi organisation.
Many 'Islamic' countries have institutionalised this intolerance, outlawing the public practice of any other Faith, and made the possession of any religious icon, other than Muslim, a punishable offence. Non-Muslim minorities live in abject terror of blasphemy laws in Pakistan, as in many other Muslim countries.
The truth is, the state lies behind much of the Islamist extremism and frenzy that we are witnessing today. To return to the case of the Danish cartoons, there was no 'spontaneous outburst' of popular sentiment; it was only after the Organisation of Islamic Countries decided to whip up emotions around the issue, and states like Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Saudi Arabia began to incite the rabble through official statements and actions, or statements by religious leaders tied to the regimes there, disseminated through official media, that the violent street protests commenced.
In Pakistan, the protests and the violence have principally been led by the Jamaat-ud-Dawa - the reincarnation of the purportedly 'banned' Lashkar-e-Toiba - which has flourished under state patronage, and that was cast by the Musharraf administration into a 'leadership' role recently in the relief operations after the earthquake that devastated parts of Pakistan occupied Kashmir.
But the 'cartoon crisis' is not unique. Even while this controversy was raging across the world, Shia minorities were being attacked by Sunni terrorists in Pakistan; in the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir, a case was registered against the local chapter of the Bible Society of India for the 'grievous crime' of distributing "gas cylinders, three water bottles, audio cassettes and a copy of the New Testament in Urdu" to earthquake victims in a village in Uri.
In Ladakh, riots were engineered between Muslims and Buddhists because some torn pages of the Quran were recovered, leading to allegations of sacrilege. In the Aligarh Muslim University, a young girl was being threatened with collective rape for daring to protest against a diktat against wearing jeans and a T-shirt. These are only a few current and proximate examples of a remorseless oppression over the decades.
Such thuggeries are, of course, not unique to Islam. There are extremist groups drawing dubious 'inspiration' from other faiths who ape such conduct as well, and Valentines Day this year - as in the past few years - attracted the ire and violence of Hindu extremist hooligans. But these remain - fortunately - aberrations in the larger context of conduct among adherents of other faiths. They have increasingly become the dominant form of public articulation in the Muslim community.
There is an American Indian saying: 'it takes an entire village to raise a single child'. Similarly, it takes a very large community, often entire nations, to raise a single suicide bomber. For far too long, extremist Muslim discourse has been tolerated - to the point of incitement to murder - in the belief that acts of terrorism are distinct from such ideologies of hatred. But it is the wide acceptance within large sections of Muslim communities in many countries of these ideologies of hatred that produce the environment within which groups can mobilise, recruit motivate, train and deploy terrorists and suicide bombers.
Muslim liberals have long advocated 'understanding and tolerance' when dealing with Muslim sensibilities, but have seldom been known to aggressively argue for greater 'understanding and tolerance' for other faiths in 'Islamic' countries, where the record of intolerance towards and oppression of religious minorities is utterly revolting. There is a great 'Muslim exceptionalism' at work here.
The 'Muslim world' demands an absolute freedom without limits, but confers no freedom whatsoever, either on other faiths, or on dissent within its own faith. The 'tolerance' advocated by certain passages in the Quran is only something to parade at inter-faith conferences, and constitutes no part of the practice of most Muslim majority states - no doubt with occasional exceptions.
The demand, today, to impose a selective censorship in Europe on speech that is insulting to Muslims - when similar speech against other faiths enjoys full freedom - is an effort by Muslim minorities to impose, through mass violence and intimidation, their belief systems within the larger systems they have come to inhabit.
Europe would be, not only foolish, but suicidal, if it succumbs to this terrorism and coercion to invent new curbs on the media and on the freedom of speech. The democratic world must remain committed to its enlightenment values and ideals, and to the rough-and-tumble of free discourse in the 'marketplace of ideas'. All communal thuggeries, whatever faith they may claim to 'represent', must be brought to an end, and every available means must be bent to this purpose.
Personally, I think, the more fun we make of our own religions, the better it will be for the whole world, and, indeed, for our respective Faiths. I am immensely proud of being a Sikh, and am confident that no jokes or cartoons can ever undermine the eternal verities of my religion.
(Published in The Pioneer Newpaper, India - February 18, 2006)
Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
Kanwar Pal Gill, was born in Ludhiana, Punjab, India. He began his career as a police officer in the north-eastern state of Assam, quickly earning a reputation as a tough officer. He became a household name across the country as Punjab police chief in the early 1990s, when he was credited with crushing a separatist revolt in the Sikh-majority state.
Widely given credit for addressing the terrorism in Punjab, Mr Gill was dubbed “Super Cop” after his success in that state. He publishes the Faultlines journal and runs the Institute for Conflict Management, as well as advising governments and institutions on security related issues. He was asked by the government of Sri Lanka last year for similar advice. Mr Gill has also written a book, “The Knights of Falsehood”, which explores the abuse of religious institutions by the politics of freedom struggle in Punjab.
He got involved in sports administration after retirement and is currently the IHF ( Indian Hockey Federation) president.
He has also been appointed as a consultant by the Chattisgarh government to help tackle the Naxalite movement in the state.
“Democracy and liberalism are not a sufficient defence and this is a fact that the ideologues of ‘freedom’ need, equally, to comprehend. There is a fatal flaw in the liberal mind. Having established, in structure and form [though seldom in substance], a system of governance that corresponds to its conception of democracy, it feels that nothing more needs to be done. The ‘Truths’ of the liberal ideology are, as the American Declaration on the Rights of Man expresses it, ‘Self Evident’. They require no proof, no reiteration, and no defence - certainly no defence by force of arms. Once democracy [or even the ritual of quinquinneal elections] is established, according to liberal mythology, the mystical ‘invisible hand’ keeps everything in place; the ‘superior wisdom of the masses’ ensures order and justice...”. This is just so much rubbish. As we should know after living with falsehoods for fifty years now. Truth does not triumph; unless it has champions to propound it, unless it has armies to defend it.”
From his book, ‘Punjab: The Knights of Falsehood’
For some critics his success is a part of the story started by predecessor Julio Francis Ribeiro who started the “Bullet for Bullet” campaign of hitting back at militants and the strong hand in dealing with militancy adopted by Chief Minister Beant Singh.
"........Pakistani television channels aired an advertisement yesterday by the State Department with Obama and Clinton disavowing the film.
The 30-second U.S. announcement, subtitled in Urdu, shows Obama saying the U.S. rejects all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Clinton is shown saying, the United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video. We absolutely reject its content and message.
The U.S. embassy in Islamabad produced the ad from public comments by Obama and Clinton, and the State Department spent about $70,000 to buy commercial time to show it, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters Sept. 20....." Source
It’s all over for the U.K. and most of western Europe.
Thanks Cincinatus’ Wife. When I see something like this, the first thing that comes to mind is, “open fire”.
Oh rats, I can’t seem to be able to transer the image, but google images of “Mecca weather forecast”. ;-)
>”If you push people too far,”he said,”You will turn the peaceful elements into violence.”
Remember those words muzzy when you start your “peaceful” BS in America.
That’s actually from the Seige of Acre in 1291 AD. The Muslims defeated the Crusaders, there.
“The Siege of Acre (also called the Fall of Acre) took place in 1291 and resulted in the loss of the Crusader-controlled city of Acre to the Muslims. It is considered one of the most important battles of the time period. Although the crusading movement continued for several more centuries, the capture of the city marked the end of further crusades to the Levant. When Acre fell, the Crusaders lost their last major stronghold of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem. They still maintained a fortress at the northern city of Tartus, engaged in some coastal raids, and attempted an incursion from the tiny island of Ruad, but when they lost that as well in 1302/1303 in the Siege of Ruad, the Crusaders no longer controlled any of the Holy Land.”
Works for me. Might be about Imanutjob or something.
muzlims protesting? now that’s funny.
During the protest, do they take time out to pray on their rugs?
Just the scene of a warrior of the cross slaying the enemy is good enough.
And nuke the site from orbit....It's the only way to be sure......
I also thought it said age of monkey and wondered what they had against google’s monkey... If google has a monkey.
Obama explaining “the problem” to David Letterman:
OBAMA: Here’s what happened. Eh, eh... Y-y-you had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character who — who is an extremely offensive —
OBAMA: — video directed at — at Mohammed and Islam, making fun of the Prophet Mohammed. This caused great offence, uh, in much of the much of the Muslim world.
Didja see the `Muslims Campaign For Global Civility’ sign?
That’s really rich! Any place in the world where there is turmoil or strife you’ll find adherents to the Islamic `religion of peace’ on one side fomenting violence/`stirring the pot’: Nigeria; `Palestine’; throughout the middle east; the Philippines; Kashmir; the Arabian peninsula; the Caucasus; any country with a name ending in `stan’ (in this instance, in `Englandistan’); all of `Eurabia’ and coming soon to a neighborhood near you.
They are welcomed to a country as immigrants and the next thing you know they want to install the third-world s***-hole they came from!
If they try that crap here they’d better practice bleeding first.
Hey, Barry & Hillary!
Got your stories worked out yet? Liars are supposed to get their stories straight **before** they start lying. The Egyptian embassy squeezing out those warm horse droppings about how important it is not to “hurt the feelings of muslims”—as your ambassador was being sodomized and killed.
It would make a murder of crows blush, but not you two!
.....”Organisations like Google are key players and have to take responsibility for civility.
The only way to ensure civility among Muslims is to be heavily armed and outnumber them.
Who would be stupid enough to take responsibility for the civility of these animals.I would rather take responsibility for a nest of pit vipers.
Muslims, I fart in your general direction, you empty-headed, animal food trough wipers.
You're asleep at the wheel. They are already here, and have done similar stuff here, too.
10,000 ... I don’t see it
“You’re asleep at the wheel.” Speak for yourself, Dundee.
“They are already here, and have done similar stuff here, too.”
In Australia? That’s too bad. And you’re unarmed too.
Yeah, we’ve had some tentative muzzie `feeler’ demonstrations here in the US in the Detroit area, but that’s lost anyway.
If they try the harrassment of women on the street and old people on busses, as they are doing in France and parts of England—and OZ too, you say?—they will be shot dead here.
I fail to see the problem. Islam itself is a mockery. The Koran is so full of contradictions and demonstrable lies that only psychologically disturbed people could believe it. Muhammad himself attributes it to Satan.
I am reading MARKED BY DEATH by GEERT WILDERS. An amazing book of the history of Islam, which is not a religion according to Wilders, but instead, a political system similar to Communism or Socialism. Just as bloody too.
How do you stop 10,000 Muslims from demonstrating?
Toss them a female infidel.
Muslim game plan:
1. Infiltrate the enemy and become as them.
2. Introduce radical ideologies and athism into educational institutions and get professors to teach their students liberal ideals. Make socialism acceptable and introduce the concept of political correctness into the mainstream to make excuses for bad behavior. Make the line between good and evil confusing and erase absolutes and substitute moral relatvism as the decidng factor on what is right or wrong.
3. Put Muslims in key government positions.
4. Place a Muslim Kng / President in place to further reinforce the Muslim power base in the U.S.
5. Create situations / instances where Muslims are offended by Americans and use PC to get the generation that you indoctrinated to feel sympathy for “poor downtrodden Muslims”. Make Islam more acceptable and “friendly to the West.
6. Muslims protest and indicate that they are highly offended by the U.S.’s insensivity towards Muslim and ask the ace in their hole U.S. Prez to make this one exception to the First Amendment so that Americans cannot insult their “religious beliefs” while at the same having the indoctrinated U.S. dhildren who are now older demonize and speak out against Christianity because they are atheist.
7. The ace in the hole secret Muslim president changes the Constitution which allows Shariah law to become embedded in it while promoting Islam and making the younger generation mire accepting of it. Over time the next generation is Mulim and allows Shariah law to further be written into the Constitution so that infidels can now be murdered if they o not believe in Allah.
8. Takeover of the U.S. Is a success accomplished with the indoctrination of children in the U.S. from the prior generation and the introduction of the concept of PC. Satan rules for a short time before being “removed from office” by Jesus and sent to Hell.