Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACLU sues Morgan Stanley over risky mortgages
CNN Money ^ | October 15, 2012 | By Chris Isidore

Posted on 10/15/2012 7:46:22 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

The American Civil Liberties Union sued Morgan Stanley on Monday, charging the Wall Street firm discriminated against African-American homeowners and violated federal civil rights laws by providing funding for risky mortgages.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in New York, is the first that connects racial discrimination to the process of bundling subprime loans into mortgage-backed bonds that were then sold to institutional investors and pension funds. The lawsuit was filed behalf of five Detroit residents, and asks the court to certify the case as a class action. It argues as many as 6,000 black homeowners in the Detroit area may have suffered similar discrimination.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dodd; frank; subprime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: stephenjohnbanker

What in what I posted makes you think it was the bankers’ fault. You preachin to the choir....read it again.


21 posted on 10/15/2012 8:48:59 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
There was a sob story on local news last week about a retired cop who was going to lose her house because her adjustable rate mortgage payment doubled recently.

Of course, no ARM based on a reasonable index has gone up in years; most have probably reset down.

She probably had an interest-only ARM and gambled on being able to refi before the interest-only period expired.

22 posted on 10/15/2012 8:52:32 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (So?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

” What in what I posted makes you think it was the bankers’ fault.”

I didn’t. Sorry if I was vague.


23 posted on 10/15/2012 8:56:24 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

No problem....


24 posted on 10/15/2012 8:57:36 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I’m fluent in leftist native American mythology.


25 posted on 10/15/2012 9:01:22 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

the way the ACLU makes money is by suing the govt then asking for attorney fees and costs.


26 posted on 10/15/2012 9:49:47 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

ACORN’s brochure, “To Each Their Home”:

http://www.capitalresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/toeachtheirhome.pdf

Treats welfare, child support and FOOD STAMPS as “income”!!!


27 posted on 10/15/2012 10:11:03 AM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Community Reinvestment Act.””

Exactly!!

Lawyers for the banks need to bring this law out in DETAIL & show the world that Jimmah Carter & his Congress started the ball rolling that caused the mortgage mess.

They also need to find the press conference where Janet Reno threatened each & every bank in the country with ‘the power of the Justice Department’ if they didn’t give out these shaky loans.


28 posted on 10/15/2012 10:38:31 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Freepers need to be familiar with subject matter. Subprime loans were suppose to be used on minorities who cannot qualify under standard criterias. Getting the loan comes with a price for the applicant. Higher fees and interest rate. Many black borrowers did not need subprime loans because they had the income and credit history. Bankers told them that they did not qualify for conventional loans and their best chance to get a mortgage is a subprime one. Bankers pocketed higher fees and quickly sold it to the FMFM within six months. Also bankers encouraged many black borrowers who qualfied for small conventional loans to take on the larger subprime because of the lax documentation to buy the house of their dreams with the perception that real estate prices will keep going up and up. In essense the minority borrower was dumb and the mortgage banker was unscrupulous. The trials will shake all this info out into the openning. Gov and minorities will look stupid and the bankers will look criminal.


29 posted on 10/15/2012 10:51:02 AM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They should be suing obama! He was the attorney for ACORN in a lawsuit against Citibank in 1994 that demanded that banks change their loan practices to give more loans to unqualified blacks. Many Democrats also demanded the loans be made (especially Dodd and Frank) Now they are suing because they got their way and got the loans. You just can’t win with the radical left who are always looking to blame others and get a handout along the way. NObama 2012


30 posted on 10/15/2012 12:11:05 PM PDT by Captain Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The American Civil Liberties Union sued Morgan Stanley on Monday, charging the Wall Street firm discriminated against African-American homeowners and violated federal civil rights laws by providing funding for risky mortgages.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but Wall Street did NOT and could not by law do so.
That was Bawney Fwank and Todd who made it MANDATORY for BANKS to make those loans.
Once those loans were made, it doesn't much matter how they were subsequently handled. The taxpayer was already on the hook.

The Federal Government, Congress, BAWNEY FWANK, CHRIS THE PERVERT TODD, FANNIE MAE and FREDDY MAC are solely and totally responsible.

How is the ACLU planning to neutralize reality?

31 posted on 10/15/2012 1:09:54 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Damned if you do and damned if you don’t. Typical deal with socialists.


32 posted on 10/15/2012 3:00:28 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I figured ACLU was defunct since I haven’t heard them say anything about the proposed international blasphemy laws...


33 posted on 10/15/2012 3:01:40 PM PDT by UltraV (I use the term Leftist not liberal, because a true liberal would not support government censorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson