posted on 10/15/2012 12:39:37 PM PDT
And I imagine they were legit contributions.
posted on 10/15/2012 12:42:27 PM PDT
over to you, Candy..
posted on 10/15/2012 12:42:41 PM PDT
To: SeekAndFind; LS; Perdogg; napscoordinator; God luvs America; nutmeg; SoFloFreeper; Ravi; ...
Weren’t we told that contributors were shying away from Romney?
posted on 10/15/2012 12:44:14 PM PDT
(Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
And remember, these are his SEPTEMBER numbers, all before the first debate when he was declared “finished” according to the media. I imagine since then he has more than made up the difference between himself and Obama.
posted on 10/15/2012 12:47:29 PM PDT
The big difference is that Romney’s donors are not Muslims from Middle Eastern countries.
posted on 10/15/2012 12:53:01 PM PDT
The $170 million figure is almost as much as the near-record $181 million that President Obama raised last month.
And Romney didn't even have to resort to illegal overseas donations.
posted on 10/15/2012 1:01:43 PM PDT
by Blood of Tyrants
(Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
The election will close as a battle of ideas. There is no amount of spending by the Marxist that can exceed that of Romney.
To: The Goofer, Perdogg, Moochelle, holdonnow...
"Just a few bumps in the road....."
posted on 10/15/2012 3:33:16 PM PDT
(----- ------- -CHEESEBURGER_CHEESEBURGER_CHEESEBURGER- ----------------------------)
posted on 10/15/2012 4:26:37 PM PDT
(2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA OR NV = 281EV)
When the Obama figures for Sept were reported last week by KOLO, the Reno ABC affiliate, the anchor clearly said:
Obama AND THE DNC raised $181 Million in September. That is 2 entities-—not just Obama.
Can anyone clear this up?
I think that the $181 million figure does refer to BOTH the DNC & Obama direct, which would then be deliberate to distort Barry’s fundraising versus Mitt’s.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson