The Republicans need to insist on objective moderators, not these shills for the BO regime.
” The Republicans need to insist on objective moderators”
And whose fault is it ? Why did the RNC agree to left wing moderators, like Crowley?
Call your House Rep, or Senator.
They get to pick one mod (instead of the three they pick now),
the Repubs get to pick one mod (Mark Levin would be the offset for “Candy”),
and one drawn out of a hat of equal numbers of mods put into the hat by both campaigns.
Why aren’t Republicans demanding equal time?
We can blame the biased moderators all we want, but if we really believe in personal responsibility, then we should blame our own party for appointing members to the Presidential Debate Commission who allow the libs tro control the debates.
I suspect the Obama has already beat us to that punch by insisting upon his “moderators” or no debate.
Frankly as Mitt proved its better to at least have a form where you can dispute their lies, slanders, and argumentation flaws than to have nothing at all.
Remember the Democrats owe the media and and ground campaign with their army of ideological and Government paided minions.
Knowing the natural weakness of their case, and falsehood of their claims. I think we should think ourselves extremely lucky that they agreed to any debate at all. For without a debate they have the advantage.