Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hadaclueonce

Total insanity.

Ethanol was first pushed as a “partially oxygenated” fuel which would reduce CO2 emissions, and as a “renewable” fuel. It does have a beneficial effect on octane rating.

It is a net loser on emissions when the entire ethanol production life cycle is examined. It reduces fuel economy, which really makes it a loser for drivers.

And its effect on the food supply is reflected in outrageous food prices.

E85 has not been a big hit. E15 is bad news for fuel economy. But ethanol is big bidness for some of the midwestern states, and it will be pushed hard from now on.


4 posted on 10/18/2012 12:41:31 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Ole Okie
E15 is bad news for fuel economy

E10 is just as bad.

I have a 2011 Hyundai Genesis Coupe -- was getting around 18.3 MPG around town. Local Entec stations have started offering Ethanol free 87 Octane recently.

After just 2 tanks of E FREE I am getting 21.6 MPG.

6 posted on 10/18/2012 12:44:48 PM PDT by commish (After Four Years of Obama, America needs a little R & R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Ole Okie

I don’t believe it raises prices that much, everything ends up in the feedlot at the end of the day. Estimates have been made that indicate it might raise the price of corn about $.20 within a 150 mile radius of the ethanol plant. I don’t use it unless I have to because it does lower fuel economy.


7 posted on 10/18/2012 12:46:53 PM PDT by jonefab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson