Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Candy Crowley's bosses must be prosecuted - they knew about the collusion
Logic | 19 October 2012 | Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin

Posted on 10/19/2012 5:26:12 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Think. Candy Crowley and Obama colluded in the debate. It's obvious. How would Obama know to tell her to "Get the transcript!" unless they had planned a response ahead of time on the Benghazi issue? Then, Crowley enabled Obama's lie about the topic and cut Romney off. The next set of questions that must be asked must deal with the supervisors who knew that the collusion took place prior to the debate.

Candy Crowley did not have the authority to use her firm's equipment to video conference with the Obama camp about debate topics/answers (had to have video conferenced to try and cover -- couldn't be anywhere near each other physically, obviously). Candy Crowley did NOT unilaterally decide to collude with the Obama camp. People at all levels of Crowley's firm had to know this was taking place including the technicians who made it happen. Those individuals must be prosecuted for illegally trying to skew the governing process of this country. This is treason.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: candygate; cnn; collusion; crowley; enemyofamerica; libyacoverup; mediamalpractice; obama; presidentlies; propaganda; rewritinghistory; security; tinfoil; transcriptgate; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last
Treason. The very media that might even look into this is itself corrupt.
1 posted on 10/19/2012 5:26:17 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin; Lazamataz

Nothing will be provable. What we all saw was quite bad enough.


2 posted on 10/19/2012 5:31:18 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

3 posted on 10/19/2012 5:32:26 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

No prosecution necessary. It all worked to Romney’s benefit. The eversion of the intended effect is sufficient punishment, I think.


4 posted on 10/19/2012 5:32:39 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

The left is evil. I watch day after day as their minions keep defending them. They will say anything.

I was happy to see the Republican ad come out with the timeline - proving clearly that this corrupt administration was deliberatley steering the American public for the sake of the election.

Someone has to answer as to why Crowldy happened to have that transcript, and how Obama knew to ask her to refer to it. Unbelievable corruption.


5 posted on 10/19/2012 5:36:35 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

While I tend to do as little business as possible with companies that advertise on media outlets that insult me, I’m only one guy. I think it’s time to advance the theme that: “If you can’t trust the network, you can’t trust their advertisers.” This takes the fight directly to the pocketbook of both entities.


6 posted on 10/19/2012 5:36:40 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Re-distribute my work ethic, not my wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
True. Nothing is likely to be provable. The closest we can get will be hard numbers on interruptions, time spoken, who got to close a segment, etc.

Still: there is a consensus among both RINO and conservative pundits that Candy Boo Boo Child behaved UTTERLY out of control. This will ensure Candy will not be served at a R&R White House, and it SHOULD cause our side to start asserting itself with regards to moderator selection.

SHOULD. We have seen fumbles before.

7 posted on 10/19/2012 5:39:01 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

“Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...”

The MSM is free to tell all the lies they want.

Jackass Romney agreed to the format, and if he didn’t know that sabotage could be expected, he’s too stupid to be president.


8 posted on 10/19/2012 5:39:34 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Sorry, I blame the stupid Republican party for agreeing on the moderator and the format. Why would anyone be surprised at this??


9 posted on 10/19/2012 5:40:09 AM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
The very media that might even look into this is itself corrupt.

True, to a point: We own vast segments of the new media. We are gradually increasing in power and influence.

10 posted on 10/19/2012 5:41:19 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

I agree arm bears, a national boycott against all advertisers would cut the purse strings. This is the only thing that is going to stop the networks.


11 posted on 10/19/2012 5:41:38 AM PDT by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

When he asked her to say it again louder, it was comletely unPresidential. It was petulant, immature, petty, pathetic, childish, smug and dangerous. He is so thin skinned and is so vengeful, he doesn’t need to have the code for our nuclear weapons.


12 posted on 10/19/2012 5:41:58 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

“Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...”

The MSM is free to tell all the lies they want.


BUMP. And we are free to bring to light, ridicule, and regard the MSM for what it is: a speaking mechanism for liberal talking points, no longer (if ever) mainstream.


13 posted on 10/19/2012 5:44:21 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Candy Crowley: The MSMs' very own Agatha Trunchbull.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Not enough people are talking about the other section of the debate which indicated collusion --

Mitt Romney finally brought up the very ugly topic of Fast & Furious. Obama wasted no time at all -- "Candy?" he said -- and Candy Crowley very dutifully jumped in and changed the topic. Almost like they had pre-arranged that strategy.

14 posted on 10/19/2012 5:45:06 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

CNN threw away their last bit of credibility, and for what?

Romney saw the trap coming, and wriggled free. All this whining about how Romney did not prosecute the attack is just people upset because he declined to stick his head in the noose.

When it’s two against one, and you don’t know what the deal is, you back off. It’s simple math. Romney backed off, because he could sense the hammer, but could not see from which direction the blow was going to fall.

That’s because Romney is smarter than Obama, Crowley and Michelle all put together.

Now this failed ambush will keep the Benghazi story alive through Election Day, and demonstrate to the voters how Obama and his MFM enablers are lying cheats. This is a disaster for Obama and the MFM.

Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch...


15 posted on 10/19/2012 5:45:55 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (If Hillary reminds every man of his ex-wife, Joe Biden reminds every woman of her ex-husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

You owe me a jug of Brain Bleach.


16 posted on 10/19/2012 5:48:20 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

CNN has a multi-million dollar appeal languishing in Obama’s stacked NLRB (NLRB Case 05-CA-031828).
An administrative-law judge (an Obama donor) ruled against CNN in 2009 .
CNN’s appeal has since set before the 4 member NLRB board: 3 of them Obama appointees.

It seems awfully convenient that Obama has had this hanging over CNN’s head his whole tenure.
Can’t help but wonder if it was why Crowley was even more partisan than I expected.


17 posted on 10/19/2012 5:48:26 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

‘completely’. Mistyped and missed the ‘p’.


18 posted on 10/19/2012 5:49:07 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Wow, she says she’s a vegetarian. Only potatoes?


19 posted on 10/19/2012 5:52:58 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Yer pic...........”milk through the nose” funny!!!


20 posted on 10/19/2012 5:55:37 AM PDT by wesagain (The God (Elohim) of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is the One True GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse

We have ranted and raved about the moderators/networks selected and still the GOP goes along with the libs, everytime. The Republican Party is, indeed, the Stupid Party.


21 posted on 10/19/2012 5:58:09 AM PDT by jch10 (America needs some R and R!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Treason. The very media that might even look into this is itself corrupt.

Exactly!

It seems to me there has been a lot of this type of thing going on. The unemployment numbers being reported as dipping below 8% is one of them. Supposedly there was collusion with the person in California responsible for turning in the numbers, but many in the media immediately touted the decrease as truth without asking how it could have occurred.

I have been calling this group of sycophantic supporters The Mouthpiece Media for a few years. They have become more than that now. They are The Moat Media for Obama. They serve as a moat between the people and their boy king in the castle.

22 posted on 10/19/2012 6:01:34 AM PDT by arasina (Communism is EVIL. So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I agree. This all worked to Romney’s benefit.

I really don’t see that there was collusion ahead of time. And I think she said she didn’t have a transcript in front of her.

What I think happened was this. Obama made the tactical decision that if Romney started up with the YouTube stuff that O would claim he knew it was terrorism all along because he used the word in that speech. So O had his line ready, and since he’s a narcissist who doesn’t ever think he’s wrong, he figured his “Rose Garden Terrorism Speech” defense was foolproof. That’s why had acted like such a cock during the interchange.

In the case of Crowley, she’s just a partisan hack. The equivalent of having Sean Hannity moderate that debate for us, but the left can’t see that. So when her guy started to get pushed down on the mat, she emotionally couldn’t control it. She had to jump in and did so with an excited girlish smile like one of the slugs on The View.

Watch that tape, Candy gets all excited about putting down Romney. Then after five seconds, she catches herself and knows show screwed up and tries to then add something at the end about how Romney was right about the YouTube video in an effort to hide what she just did.

The whole country saw Crowley exposed as a dirty ref. And Obama’s crappy “defense” he trotted out doesn’t work, so he is exposed for the next debate on Monday.

It all worked out perfect for Romney.


23 posted on 10/19/2012 6:04:12 AM PDT by SteveAustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kempster
Wow, she says she’s a vegetarian. Only potatoes?

Some other FReeper called her "Candybar Crowley".

24 posted on 10/19/2012 6:04:19 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

25 posted on 10/19/2012 6:05:44 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
You may need to adjust the tinfoil hat you're wearing.

Before the debate I predicted Crowley would advocate for Obama. She did. It's really not a surprise at all.

There need no have been "collusion" as you claim for the events to have transpired as they did. Of course he'd say "get the transcript" because it makes it sounds like he's absolutely certain of his remarked. He was bluffing and Crowley was fooled because she wanted to be fooled; she was on his side.

An odder moment came with Obama walking towards a questioner before the questioner was identified other than by name. He hadn't stood up for his question yet.

The question was about Libya and supposedly born of a workplace "brain trust" discussion. It certainly appeared Obama may have known the questioner on sight and went to him.

See the clip

26 posted on 10/19/2012 6:06:49 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Osama's dead... and so is our ambassador - Coulter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

Romney saw the trap coming, and wriggled free. All this whining about how Romney did not prosecute the attack is just people upset because he declined to stick his head in the noose.


Agree. Also, this was at the end of the debate, and Candy certainly wasn’t going
to give Mitt more time to lay out the timeline, Carney stating “ it wasn’t a terrorist
attack” days after this speech.

In addition, for those who have given speeches natural breaks would be at
the 9/11 and today segments

Read this with that emphasis and the speech takes on a clear speaking about
9/11 and acts of terror and a closer on Bengahzi without lumping it into
acts of terror.

I have broken down the paragraphs that way from the original text.

“Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks.

We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

Barry wants everything so loose and his way that he wants us to believe he really
did seperate 9/11 and clearly call Bengazhi a “ terrorist attack” cloaked under
“ acts of terror”

B.S.


27 posted on 10/19/2012 6:09:01 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

What was Romney supposed to do? Look like a coward and back out of the debates? If he did that he’d be 6-10 points behind like he was before the debates. Luckily Jim Leher, a liberal himself, is at least a professional and didn’t act as a filter or a 3rd debater.


28 posted on 10/19/2012 6:11:35 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Why didn’t he say “Replay the video”?????


29 posted on 10/19/2012 6:12:19 AM PDT by arichtaxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

had to have video conferenced to try and cover — couldn’t be anywhere near each other physically, obviously)....It was stated from a Daily Caller (?) don’t know if that was the source, she visited the White Hut on Sunday, before the debate. Let me find that thread.


30 posted on 10/19/2012 6:13:11 AM PDT by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveAustin
And I think she said she didn’t have a transcript in front of her.

That's fine. She probably didn't. And I won't push the idea that the whole thing was choreographed and planned out -- that would be crazy talk, right?

But look at the sequence:

Romney: It took you 14 days to say this was terrorism.
Obama: No, I said it the very next day, in the Rose Garden.
Romney: No, you didn't.
Obama: Get the transcript.
Crowly: [Waving paper] Gov. Romney, he did say it was terrorism.

At that point, on stage, in front of 65 million people, should Romney assume that she has a transcript in front of her and that she is 100% provably correct in defending the president? Yeah, that's probably the smart choice. So, Romney had to taper back, play it safe and not go in for the kill.

It seems to have worked out very well for Romney anyway -- but if Obama says "Get the transcript" and Crowly starts waving paper and agreeing with him ... well ... maybe she didn't have the transcipt in front of her, but Penn & Teller themselves could not have supplied a better misdirection.

31 posted on 10/19/2012 6:13:22 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

IMO the very worst part of this treachery on the part of the media is the stunning low regard in which they hold the American public. The truly galactic levels of hubris displayed by CNN and Crowley is almost beyond belief had I not myself been a witness.


32 posted on 10/19/2012 6:14:02 AM PDT by Lacey2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse
I blame the stupid Republican party for agreeing on the moderator and the format.

It was obvious from the beginning how uneven this would be, but what would you have them do, not debate? Their position was not one of strength in this matter, and to raise a stink they would have been made to look even weaker, whiny and even more stupid.

I wish there were an easy solution, but there's not. After this last round of debates, after the election, if we (not they) don't go to the so called commission on the debates (yes, the commission decides) and demand change for some kind of new method to pick moderators and questions that are more even handed, then we are just as much at fault as anyone.

33 posted on 10/19/2012 6:16:35 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Crowley waved the transcript at obama, as if to say, “Got right here,Boss!” like a good little(?) sycophant.

People all over the country saw it. Left and right saw it. Of course, the left will ignore it and and try to change the subject. The Right should pound and pound and pound it home on the next debate which WILL BE ON FOREIGN POLICY.

This debate was supposed to be about DOMESTIC POLICY. Why then was a question on LIBYA allowed in the first place unless she planned this whole deal? She chose the questions! Then she set up the whole thing ON HER OWN, knowing that she would get an okay from upstairs suits.

Obama KNEW she had that transcript! He said, “Get THE transcript!” NOT “Get A transcript!” ..............


34 posted on 10/19/2012 6:16:54 AM PDT by Red Badger (Why yes, that was crude and uncalled for.......That's whay I said it..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
How many FEC violations would there be if all this collusion was added up and rightfully counted as donations to the Obama campaign? Bruce Springsteen and Jay Z included......what's the value of their appearances?
35 posted on 10/19/2012 6:17:51 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
Someone has to answer as to why Crowldy happened to have that transcript, and how Obama knew to ask her to refer to it. Unbelievable corruption.

I don't think Crowley had the transcript. Nothing I see on the video makes me think she consulted a transcript to back up Zero's claim plus not enough time elapsed for her to actually do so. I think Zero's reference to the transcript was just a handy attempt at rhetorical evasion.

Don't get me wrong. Whether her bias is conscious or unconscious I don't know, but either way so her default position was to back up Zero which was manifested by, for example, the weird, liberal hobbyhorse questions she chose to include; or giving Zero a total of four more more minutes to speak than she allowed Romney; or allowing Zero to rebut Romney's rebuttals, which she never allowed Romney to do, etc.

Cordially,

36 posted on 10/19/2012 6:18:39 AM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

The MSM is free to lie. However, they pretend tp be what they are not.


37 posted on 10/19/2012 6:20:51 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

The problem wasn’t the ‘debate’. The problem was agreeing to its format to begin with.

The Lefterator was bragging that she was going to hijack the process several days before. Romney’s people should have played hardball and had her replaced.

Even if her replacement was another libtard, a stand would have been taken for future precedent.


38 posted on 10/19/2012 6:30:00 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Candy looks at Newsweek and sees her future.

If they don’t save Obama there will be no bailout for dinosaur media.

Obama ISN’T going to win. Time to dust off the ol’ resume and put it in a binder.

BTW, the proper phrase is “do you want fries with that?”


39 posted on 10/19/2012 6:40:31 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
The media is complicit in the cover-up of what really happened to the ambassador, why was he there? who said to blame video tape? Why was security request refused?

It is national security. CNN does not want the public to question this administration, know the truth or hold Obama accountable.

40 posted on 10/19/2012 6:40:53 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Prosecute? Really? Did I accidentally get redirected to D U?

This is small government conservatism website, not fascists in paradise. The last thing we need is gubment prosecutors rounding up journalists and trying them for treason. We have that little first amendment after all.

No I don’t this kind this post is funny! Come on people. Mitt could sue the debate commission for breach of contract. It would be a stupid thing to do. Leave the gubment, its prosecutors, guns, dogs, courts, and thugs out of it.


41 posted on 10/19/2012 6:42:57 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
The problem wasn’t the ‘debate’. The problem was agreeing to its format to begin with.

What would the headlines say if they hadn't agreed to the format? If Romney's people had objected to it and to Crowley as moderator, they would have played right into the left's agenda.

42 posted on 10/19/2012 6:46:19 AM PDT by arasina (Communism is EVIL. So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: arasina

Yes, that’s one approach. Like accepting a ‘moderate’ like Romney as GOP candidate so liberals will be less offended.


43 posted on 10/19/2012 6:49:49 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

How US Ambassador Chris Stevens May Have Been Linked To Jihadist Rebels In Syria
44 posted on 10/19/2012 6:53:40 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wesagain
”milk through the nose” and "gotta' change my underwear" funny!!!

That's a classic!

45 posted on 10/19/2012 6:58:18 AM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice
‘completely’. Mistyped and missed the ‘p’.

When the typo is that minor, we tend to get it on first view.

46 posted on 10/19/2012 7:01:44 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
valid point,

ABC also prearranged, collusion with the Obama administration when George Stephanopoulos asked Romeny an odd debate question regarding birth control, so they could launch their "war on women" campaign.

Fluke and planned parenthood were featured speakers at DNC convention. The issue was brought up again in last debate.

MSM now discussing bindergate.

47 posted on 10/19/2012 7:03:08 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Is that 'man' capable of doing anything without looking like a complete poofter?


48 posted on 10/19/2012 7:06:11 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

““If you can’t trust the network, you can’t trust their advertisers.””

Amen to that. And I think it is our duty to tell the advertisers that.


49 posted on 10/19/2012 7:28:21 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
More CNN collusion?..

How Much of a Set-Up Was Crowley's Libya Question? Jack Cashill

...Crowley conceded a shortage of time and an excess of audience questions. Nevertheless, instead of moving on to that next question, Crowley asked a question of her own. Even before she began to ask, however, Obama was strolling confidently towards Crowley as though he knew what was going to happen next.

The question involved Secretary of State Clinton's taking responsibility for embassy security. Asked Crowley, "Does the buck stop with the secretary of state?" Obama was more than ready for this one. "Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job, but she works for me," said he forcefully. "I'm the president, and I'm always responsible."

50 posted on 10/19/2012 7:36:18 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson