Ten myths about gay ‘marriage’

Life Site News ^ | Oct 18, 2012 | Peter Saunders

[RandallFlagg]

Well, I want to marry a 1971 Hemi Barracuda!

So THERE!!!

;-)

[Fightin Whitey]

If you get that marriage to happen I wonder if you’d consider adopting me...and then putting me in your will...dad?

[IronJack]

In Minnesota, as elsewhere, the libs have framed it as: "Vote NO. Don't take away the right to marry." Which of course is an utter lie. The right to marry already exists and will not be changed whatsoever by refusing to extend it to homos. So it's not about "taking away" ANYTHING. It's about expanding the definition of "marriage" to the point that it's meaningless, and forcing a secular definition of that institution upon a religious community that refuses to accept it.

The counter to this rhetoric should be "Vote YES. Protect the family and the cornerstone of our culture."

Homo marriage is fascism at its best.

[Monorprise]

The right to marry is in a very real way being taken away by this abomination of a redefinition.

You see even you too are playing into their game by saying your extending the right to marry to homos. No your not extending any right your simply abrogating the name of true marriage by endorsing a lie.

No two people of the same sex can ever be truly married simply because such a union cannot exist except between two people of separate sexes. That is a fundamental fact of nature and it is not with in our power to lie about it.

In enforcing this lie you might as well be saying gravity is a repulsive rather than a attractive force.

[IronJack]

I’d suggest you reread my post. You’re wayyyyyy off.