Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack

This is the war, but this particular battle should be defined as simply: “Real Marriage v.s. ‘Gay marriage’”

Because that is precisely what this conflict is about, the institution and the truth which is inextricably linked to the propose of that institution. Family(reproductive) unions.


20 posted on 10/20/2012 8:23:02 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Monorprise
In Minnesota, as elsewhere, the libs have framed it as: "Vote NO. Don't take away the right to marry." Which of course is an utter lie. The right to marry already exists and will not be changed whatsoever by refusing to extend it to homos. So it's not about "taking away" ANYTHING. It's about expanding the definition of "marriage" to the point that it's meaningless, and forcing a secular definition of that institution upon a religious community that refuses to accept it.

The counter to this rhetoric should be "Vote YES. Protect the family and the cornerstone of our culture."

Homo marriage is fascism at its best.

23 posted on 10/21/2012 8:42:14 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson