Skip to comments.It Is Time to Ostracize Obama Supporters
Posted on 10/19/2012 7:52:27 AM PDT by sevinufnine
A vote for Obama is a vote for theft, imprisonment and murder.
We have tried legally, in State courts, Federal courts and the United States Supreme Court to stop his ongoing illegal behavior, all to no avail. US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is on video record responding to a question about a President having to be a natural born citizen, he said, "We're avoiding that issue."
(Excerpt) Read more at english.pravda.ru ...
Obama supporters insist on destroying all that is good and decent in this world. So forget them. No more freebies from us. No more insults from them. No more favors from us. No more filthy talk from them. These people hate us more than we hate them. They despise us.
Condemn them to a life without you. Let them earn a living on someone else's money.
OK I admit, pretty radical editorial, but frighteningly true. Leave it up to a publication overseas (in Russia no less) to put it up as front page news!
They have been OSTRICHIZED ever since they were born!...........
We can survive and prosper very well without Obama supporters. But without us to support their morally corrupt lifestyles, they will perish. So, forget them.
That's the politest thing you can say about it.
As Solzeneitzn said “Oh, Western freedom-loving “left-wing” thinkers! Oh, left-wing labourists! Oh, American, German and French progressive students! All of this is still not enough for you. The whole book has been useless for you. You will understand everything immediately, when you yourself “hands behind the back” toddle into our [Gulag] Archipelago.”
“The whole book has been useless for you. You will understand everything immediately, when you yourself hands behind the back toddle into our [Gulag] Archipelago.”
>> Even then will they truly understand, or just wonder like a deer in the headlights?
They will be properly ostracized on November 6th
“They have been OSTRICHIZED ever since they were born!”
Hmmm.... I always thought they were lobotomized at birth.
They will be properly ostracized on November 6th.>>>>>>>>> Yes, it’s looking more and more like we the people finally have Hope of a Change after the last 4 (horrific) years.
God Bless America!!
The way to “punish” liberal ideology and those who hold it is to disempower the government from alleviating the consequences of living as a liberal.
Reality doesn’t favor liberalism, and it has to be artificially supporte, by force, by taking from those who DON’T live by it to alleviate the behavioral consequences of those who DO live by it.
That was a fun read.. Pretty much sums up how I have felt about the Dem voters from the start. My rage was always directed at them more so than the actual candidates they support.
Shows you how deep the division runs, it is much deeper and wider than the Mariner Canyon on Mars.
I understand your feeling completely HailReagan. (BTW, Reagan was the 1st president I ever voted for once I was old enough to do so :)
I heard an interesting response once when someone asked who Obama could have been elected when he has no America values. Answer to this was “A cannibal tribe will always want the most ruthless of the cannibal warriors to be their king.”
Same with these do-nothing liberals. They want to strip others of what they have for themselves (i.e.steal it). They elect someone like Obama who is a crooked thief himself, a liar, cares nothing for the law of the land, etc. etc. Give his supporters/”tribe” something to look up to! Sadly so...sadly so. People do vote for those they see as being like them or that hold their values.
Well, conservative men could start by refusing to chase cheap, slutty, liberal women.
Working on a major update and content overhaul. De-emphasizing the VSAT internet thing and promoting my WDS networking skills as they apply to point-to-point/point-to-multipoint connectivity and IP cameras.
“Well, conservative men could start by refusing to chase cheap, slutty, liberal women.”
LOL...you could have summed all that up and simply said “liberal women”. Would’ve covered it all. ;>)
The historical points and points of economic natural law are correct, although it is written as a rant.
Exactly why it would be dismissed by the American and European MSM.
I'm curious as to how much Communism is left over in Russia, and stuff like this suggests not a lot. It would be in the best interests of commies to prop Obama up as much as possible, as it would be in the best interests of nations economically competing with the USA to do the same.
Pravda may have taken the high road here and is doing the service of warning.
Agreed. Amazes me how much on Pravda site is ultra-right wing. It’s nuts.
A year or two into Obama’s “reign” there was a series of articles concerning his birth certificate and citizenship (whether American, Indonesian, Kenyan, or what?) Interestingly enough the Russian who wrote it has absolutely no doubt Obama is illegally in the office of president. He discussed how his birth father’s country of origin made it a mandate that a child born outside of the country HAD to be declared a citizen of that country if they were to be brought back in. Wow, huh? Wish I had the link.
I got your message in 1970.
It makes 'em mad,... really.
Any time someone who doesn’t know better tells me they like Obama, I treat them with such disgust, and if that doesn’t repel them, I become so condescending to them. I make it clear he is an enemy of the country, the Church, the family, the taxpayer, etc. (providing clear-cut examples); more than once they leave with a very different perception of The Sultan. I’m surprised at how many enjoy the conversation enough to return for a follow-up (especially since “Obama phone” lady went viral); people don’t seem to be buying the nonsense about Republican obstructionism causing Obama’s failure anymore.
I said over a year ago, and I still believe it: Romney will carry NJ (at the time we didn’t know who the Republican candidate would be). There are libs here, but they love money enough for many of them to support the tax-cutting Christie (and they strongly support segregation). Romney doesn’t seem to be a threat to their right to murder babies, and admitted he’ll hire token females, so he should get a good chunk of them. The things about Romney that (rightfully) bother so many FReepers are the things that put some lib places in play for him.
Because they're probably laughing their ослы off.
Beautifully said!As much as the takers vilify “the evil, greedy rich,” i.e. those who work and are self supporting, imagine where they would be without us! No public housing, free school lunches, welfare, food stamps, and Obamaphones. Then “the poor” would have to live like those who are really poor, like those in Calcutta or Mexico City. My parents both grew up in poverty during the Depression, with no social services like today. I never heard any of the combined l3 siblings use the word victim. Of the l3, 9 became successful entrepreneurs, one became a respected surgeon, and one became a teacher. All seven brothers served honorably during WW II. How was it possible for these poor people to become successful without liberalism?
The guy’s head is 3 feet away from where it should be to accurately represent an Obama supporter.
I have noticed that also, and am as surprised as you.
I know the article is a rant but it speaks for many of us here...
I did not intend to dismiss the article as a rant (that's why I cited as truthful the facts sprinkled throughout it). My Intent was to warn that the left would dismiss it as a Pravda rant without addressing the facts therein, they never address the facts.