Skip to comments.Mika's Latest Benghazi Excuse: There Are Some Things Obama Admin Can't Talk About
Posted on 10/19/2012 8:19:19 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
So THAT'S why President Obama and his spox have seemed so shifty on the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans including the US ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens. There really is a perfectly good explanation for everything. It's just that--darn it!--state secrecy prevents the prez from telling us. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Such was the sorry excuse that Mika Brzezinski suggested on today's Morning Jones. When Josh Green of Bloomberg recommended that President Obama get his story in order before Monday's debate, Mika mysteriously said: "there may be some parts of this which they can't talk about, which makes it a very difficult situation."
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Obama has perfectly good explanation on Benghazi attacks. But sadly, state secrecy prevents him from telling us. Yeah, right. Ping to Today show list.
He can talk about it on Comedy Central but he can’t in the debate. Deep man.
Mika got in line on pretty day, not brains day.
How many things were there that George Boush couldn’t have talked about?
“there may be some parts of this which they can’t talk about, which makes it a very difficult situation.”
You mean like birth certificate, several social security cards, College records, Father and mother...
This was not an INTEL failure, it was a LEADERSHIP failure. Only Obama could order a rescue mission (One hour from southern Italy) but he didn't. Instead, he came up with the "video" lie as an excuse for dead Americans. He preferred a few dead Americans in a "contained" crisis, than risk a short-fuse rescue mission.
This begs the question for the obama shills: ‘Is it that you’re that stupid, or you think we’re stupid?’
They can not talk about the weapons they gave the terrorist to kill everyone in Libya. The weapons they were unable to get back.
Wouldn’t be “optimal”.
I hope that Obama makes an attempt Monday to make this case.
It will allow Romney to point out that it is certainly appropriate for any administration to hold back information in certain sensitive situations.
However, it is not ok for an administration to outright lie in the process about the cause (i.e., the video).
This approach is not going to work.
And there, I believe is the answer. Even this admin cannot be this incompetent. The ambassador was on a confidential mission to try and get back some of the weapons we handed out to bad guys. Fast and Furious Deux.
That is what I was thinking also. If Ambassador Stevens was in Benghazi engaged in some half-baked plan to retrieve the weapons we gave to the Muslim Brotherhood minions, this is certainly something the 'Obama Admin can't talk about'...
This would be even less optimal than the '4 bumps in the road' that were left behind...
She does have perky breasts.
That would have been a perfect comeback from RINO Joe if he truly wanted to defend the party he claims to represent and it’s current nominee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.