Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If elected, Romney wants a say in 'fiscal cliff' negotiations
Yahoo News ^ | 10/19/2012 | KASIE HUNT

Posted on 10/19/2012 12:05:31 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Mitt Romney's transition team is quietly talking with government officials and Capitol Hill to develop a plan, if he's elected, to prevent massive cuts to the defense budget and extend tax cuts first passed under President George W. Bush.

The Republican's goal is to put his own stamp on legislation to fix the so-called fiscal cliff well before his Jan. 20 inauguration. The tax cuts are set to expire Jan. 1, and economists in both political parties warn say the reductions in spending combined with higher taxes would likely throw the country back into recession.

The economic policy planning is a major element of what's dubbed "The Readiness Project" inside the campaign. Led by former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, Romney's transition team has been at work since summer preparing to choose Cabinet officials and build the new government if he's elected. The team has held events to raise private money, hired more staff in Washington, and moved into bigger, government-provided offices Sept. 4. Some of Romney's top campaign advisers, including former private equity colleague Bob White, are preparing to take on larger roles in the transition.

Looming over the standard transition discussions is the big policy fight on the horizon — created by lawmakers trying to force a deal to reform entitlements and cut government spending — and what role Romney should take if elected.

President Barack Obama also faced significant, pressing policy problems and began grappling with them before the inauguration. The country's financial system was in crisis, work was beginning on an economic stimulus plan and U.S. automakers were still in trouble. In the early months of his term, Obama pushed a stimulus bill through Congress and restructured the auto companies in a bailout process that Bush had begun.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; deficit; fiscalcliff; romney

1 posted on 10/19/2012 12:05:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mitt Romney’s Office of the President-Elect. I actually like this.


2 posted on 10/19/2012 12:07:59 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Perdogg; nutmeg; DarthVader; NFHale; Clintonfatigued

Mittens is entitled to use the “Office of the President Elect” right? Or is that just for Obama?

What a complete f**cking farce that was...showed the idiots what they just elected.


3 posted on 10/19/2012 12:09:19 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (The Glove don't fit, but it's better than a burqa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Carney refused to say how Obama would attempt to approach the lame-duck session of Congress if Romney were to win the presidency.

My bet .... scorched earth.

4 posted on 10/19/2012 12:10:57 PM PDT by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Obama loses (and hopefully he will) I’m still going back to Birtherism. Obama needs to answer for all of his crimes. But then again, if Obama wins I’m going Birther anyways.


5 posted on 10/19/2012 12:13:16 PM PDT by tsowellfan (KEEP WORKING like we are 10 POINTS DOWN!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

I agree with you totally! But after watching “Dreams of My Real Father”, I’m wondering if when 0bama made the rounds in congress and the SCOTUS he admitted his real father was Frank Marshall Davis. That might explain why none of those pukes want to challenge his natural born status. He does look like him.


6 posted on 10/19/2012 12:20:13 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Get that evil, foreign, muslim, usurping, gay commie bastard out of MY White House!" FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They aint doing this unless they are sure, they are expecting to win.


7 posted on 10/19/2012 12:24:52 PM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mistake. Should have stated “when” elected.


8 posted on 10/19/2012 12:32:24 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

You got to listen to ISPYRADIO.com this weekend....interview with Jerome Corsi....very interesting. (After 1pm Saturday it will be available online.)


9 posted on 10/19/2012 12:37:34 PM PDT by goodnesswins (What has happened to America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obastard doesnt care, and neither do the democrats. They will destroy as much as they can until all are sworn in.

Then, they will try to blame the new administration.


10 posted on 10/19/2012 1:15:10 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty; summers
Agree with both of you. This is a real sign of confidence, and I saw "Dreams From My Real Father" last night (and "America 2012" this morning and I'm SICK of Obama, this Kenyan anti-American creep).

BTW, I had forgotten how incredibly "pro-American," mainstream he sounded at the DNC acceptance speech. What a liar.

11 posted on 10/19/2012 1:17:58 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WASSAMATTER???

Doesn’t the GOP trust their own in Congress to stop Rat shennanigans?

Doesn’t the Romney camp believe in checks and balances?

IMO, very, very bad idea.


12 posted on 10/19/2012 1:25:09 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS; Ravi; SeekAndFind; tatown; nhwingut; All

http://www.intrade.com/v4/misc/electoral-map/

Funny things happening on Intrade. Look at the map. Ohio has gone from lean Zero to tossup.


13 posted on 10/19/2012 1:33:44 PM PDT by Perdogg (Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So little time, so much to redistribute (a little quip from Mitt last night referring to Obama’s upcoming lame duck session).


14 posted on 10/19/2012 1:38:02 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Check freepmail.


15 posted on 10/19/2012 1:42:22 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

After Romney wins and we have the expected Republican majority (with a substantially more conservative Republican caucus leading that caucus) elected to the Senate the MOST we should allow to be done in the lame duck session is a 60 - 90 day delay in the effective date of the “fiscal cliff”. The long term changes should then be made in the Republican congress in partnership with the Republican president. Any tax changes can be made retroactive to January 1, 2013 if necessary.

We should not, under any circumstances, allow our representatives & Senators to be stampeded into doing something prematurely. Anything done in the lame duck session would have been done under too much influence by the outgoing Democrat Senate majority and their RINO partners in crime. So screw them!!


16 posted on 10/19/2012 1:44:59 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

okay.


17 posted on 10/19/2012 1:45:37 PM PDT by Perdogg (Vote like the US Constitution depends on it - it does!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Doh, didn’t go through. Have to resend. Posting updated absentees now.


18 posted on 10/19/2012 2:25:35 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bush called in Obama and Obama OK’ed EVERYTHING that Bush did!!


19 posted on 10/19/2012 3:52:45 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Job one for Ryan.


20 posted on 10/19/2012 5:37:09 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Obama didn't fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

21 posted on 10/19/2012 5:41:27 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
WASSAMATTER???
Doesn’t the GOP trust their own in Congress to stop Rat shennanigans?

I don't trust them to stop shenanigans at all, Republican or Democrat.

Doesn’t the Romney camp believe in checks and balances?

No, Romney is a statist and therefore anything 'checking' the power of the government is restricting the power of his god.

22 posted on 10/19/2012 6:19:15 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
No, Romney is a statist and therefore anything 'checking' the power of the government is restricting the power of his god.

As the man who would inherit the mess left by Obama and the Democrats, Romney has every reason in the world to inject himself into the deliberations.

It is simply absurd -- nay, pig-headed -- of you to claim otherwise.

23 posted on 10/19/2012 6:51:08 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: okie01
As the man who would inherit the mess left by Obama and the Democrats, Romney has every reason in the world to inject himself into the deliberations.
It is simply absurd -- nay, pig-headed -- of you to claim otherwise.

Read what I said again; I'm not saying that he has no reason; I'm saying that even if he had none he would insist to be in on it.
He is a statist, the state is his god; and to put a finer point on it he wishes himself to be that god or influence it such a manner as to make the distinction one without difference.

BTW, claiming this mess is "left by the democrats" is going to make the Republican party look just as bad as the democrats sating it's "left by the republicans" -- to put it succinctly both parties have added to the mess, and both have not prevented the mess [and more] from being made, or cleaning it up.

Indeed, the Republicans themselves have shown that they have no intention of "cleaning up" simply with Fast & Furious, it was on its face State Sponsored Terrorism (there doesn't need to be a committee to investigate it in order to try them for that crime, all the necessary information to start is available) and, arguably, treason (the agencies involved committed unauthorized acts of war).

24 posted on 10/19/2012 7:12:55 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Read what I said again; I'm not saying that he has no reason; I'm saying that even if he had none he would insist to be in on it.

However, you didn't qualify your post -- so how was I to know. In any event, whether Romney is a statist or not, the jury is still out. There is no question where the other guy stands, however.

And, sure, the Republicans share some blame for the state of the nation. But there is no question which party bears the bulk of the blame, either.

As to Fast & Furious, we have no idea how this will eventually turn out. So far, Issa and his committee have done a fine job of uncovering and following the evidence and have firmly controlled the direction. The Constitution has limited the pace of discovery, but they have shown ample zeal in pursuing the miscreants as quickly as circumstances have allowed.

What would you have done to accelerate the case?

If Issa drops the ball after the election, I'll be disappointed -- but, as yet, I see no reason to be complain.

25 posted on 10/19/2012 7:45:28 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: okie01
As to Fast & Furious, we have no idea how this will eventually turn out. So far, Issa and his committee have done a fine job of uncovering and following the evidence and have firmly controlled the direction. The Constitution has limited the pace of discovery, but they have shown ample zeal in pursuing the miscreants as quickly as circumstances have allowed.

What would you have done to accelerate the case?

Well, there's a couple things that they could do:

  1. start extradition-to-Mexico proceedings/negotiations; see who in the ATF wants to stay out of Mexico's justice system.
  2. get involved with the grand juries in AZ and request that they start working up their local ATF chain looking for presentable infractions [like entrapment] and the possibility if Conspiracy Against Rights from that entrapment.
  3. respond to the DOJ's stonewalling by defunding the DOJ -- likewise the ATF -- the rationale that the Congress cannot fund anything that even hints of State Sponsored Terrorism until such a time as some to-be-assembled committee determines if it was State Sponsored Terrorism. (i.e. "you're all put on unpaid leave until we get things sorted out")

Granted, the above lacks the elegance that could be used to force the immigration issue: a governor could declare a state of invasion, call up their militia [and national Guard] to secure the border (w/ authorized lethal force)... then demand that the federal government send [military] aid, under Art 4, Sec 4 -- that would cause an instant national stir, and force the open-border statist types into a no-win situation. (Note that at that point a court order demanding that the State cease such activities is, by definition, Treason [aid & comfort]... and because a court would be issuing it, it would already be admitted by a court.)

26 posted on 10/19/2012 8:49:40 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Presidential scandals from previous administrations are always dropped. That's just how it works.

I full well understand your frustration.

But, before you can start extradition proceedings, there must first be proof that a crime was committed and an indictment issued. We're not anywhere close to either -- because the evidence is behind the stonewall erected by the DOJ and the President. Before the matter can proceed further, the evidence must be examined and adjudicated. This is in accordance with the Constitution.

get involved with the grand juries in AZ and request that they start working up their local ATF chain looking for presentable infractions

As noted above, Grand Juries need evidence.

respond to the DOJ's stonewalling by defunding the DOJ -- likewise the ATF

Under the current arrangement, thanks to Harry Reid, the House's normal ability to originate (or withdraw) funds does not exist. Departmental budgets are solely a function of the baseline. Thus, in order to accomplish what you desire, the Senate must approve of this sequestration of funds -- or it will take a new administration and Congress to accomplish it. Checkmate...for the time being.

Currently, Issa (and the House) are doing what they can do.

Patience is in order. And -- my point is -- perseverance should be an expectation. Post-election, Fast & Furious should not be swept into the garbage bin of the Obama administration. The investigation -- and appropriate prosecutions -- must be pursued.

27 posted on 10/20/2012 9:46:53 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: okie01
I full well understand your frustration.

But, before you can start extradition proceedings, there must first be proof that a crime was committed and an indictment issued.

We have proof that crimes have been committed, our own firearm laws, in addition to the firearms treaty w/ Mexico.
The operation's own stated methodologies admit what was done, we have testimonies of on-the-ground agents as well.

We're not anywhere close to either -- because the evidence is behind the stonewall erected by the DOJ and the President.

Only insofar as to how deep the crime went; there is no doubt that crimes were committed.

>Before the matter can proceed further, the evidence must be examined and adjudicated. This is in accordance with the Constitution.
>>get involved with the grand juries in AZ and request that they start working up their local ATF chain looking for presentable infractions >As noted above, Grand Juries need evidence.

Not quite; grand juries are themselves investigative bodies fully capable of investigating and obtaining evidence. Most people forget this, but it is the entire grounds for presentment, which differs form indictment in that it is an order to prosecute a crime [usu investigated by the grand jury] where as an indictment is presented to the grand jury [by the government].

IOW, the grand jury is actually independent of the government itself and able to investigate, on its own authority, and order that a court try a case.

28 posted on 10/20/2012 11:58:12 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson