Skip to comments.No, the CIA is not going to take the fall for Obama on Libya-gate
Posted on 10/19/2012 8:36:04 PM PDT by Perdogg
In a ritual as old as the existence of the modern intelligence community, leaks are beginning to spill out protecting the CIA from having to take the fall for Obamas Libya cover-up.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
How many aided and abetted this TREASON?
We will be very lucky as Americans if we do not take the fall for our evil government.
The question that needs to be answered is WHY were these guys left out there with their asses hanging out. There was a reason and I don’t believe it was to hide Al Queda’s growing strength. The next question is why wasn’t a response team sent in as soon as they saw they were under attack. It looks more and more like those four guys were sacrificed.
I shouted out, Who killed the Kennedys? When after all It was the CIA
sickens and saddens me to think that One would not do the right thing about peoples lives... their very lives - not to do everything to protect life, even if it meant a momentary sacrifice from self promoting.
It will be much better if no more Americans have to die for this Administration’s lies! With or without the Media’s help!
I have a terrible feeling that this situation is going to turn very bad very quickly.
As far as I am concerned, Barack Obama and a number of other officials of the federal government need to be arrested right now tonight before they can do any more damage.
These are evil, scheming mother ****ers.
The Fox News special tonight was very helpful. A rescue attempt was made. That’s where the two former SEALs were killed. The interesting thing to me is the attack on the second American site. The attackers went right after it. You can’t get disorganized rabble to turn and attack another location that quickly. The Americans were run out of that second site. Disorganized rabble motivated by some movie don’t behave in that kind of disciplined manner and run Americans out. This was an attack by fighters, not the Benghazi Sewing Club.
Most notably that the hostage-takers, Uhh.. I mean ‘attackers’ seemed elated that Stevens was alive when captured..
Why do Obama and Hillary want to see a regime change in Libya, Egypt and Syria? They could care less about the people in Libya, Egypt and Syria. Obama and Hillary are just a couple of Democrat grifters. What is the Democrat party getting out of these regime changes? Campaign checks? This sudden interest in regime change in the Middle East doesn’t follow the Democrat play book. They focus on domestic issues. “Free the Libyans!” That’s not a campaign cry you’ll hear at a Democrat campaign headquarters. Something is rotten in Democratland.
It’s all about leaving the muslim brotherhood incharge and with weapons and means to control the middleast. 2016 Obamas America lays it out clearly.
The Libyans ran the Americans out of the consulate. I would think that there were a few fighters left around the consulate when the Ambassador was found. If he was alive, why didn’t they kidnap him then? Why didn’t they take his body, even if they saw he was going to die? It wasn’t Obama trying to kidnap his own Ambassador.
An interesting comment from an intelligent Freeper:
“This was the October surprise that O bambi and his thugs had set up. So if in fact Romney wins, these men may have been the difference. If the kidn apping and rescue plot had gone on as planned... “ (Bath-House would be seen as a saviour, JUST in time for the election.)
It may be that Obama is a “Manchurian Candidate” or in his case a “Muslim Candidate”, but my money is on him being a grifter. And what about Hillary? I don’t think she’s Muslim.
don’t know how many, but I’m sure that those involved reside at the very highest levels of our govt!