Skip to comments.North Carolina Registers Over 583 Democrat Votes Over the Age of 112
Posted on 10/21/2012 9:56:54 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
There are obviously verifiable vote fraud problems in North Carolina.
In 2010 those problems surfaced meaningfully as indicated in the below voter fraud post from an earlier Charlotte Conservative Examiner article:
Perhaps in an effort to promote North Carolina as one of the healthiest States in the Nation, this latest voter twist comes to us from Susan Myrick of the Civitas Institute in North Carolina--not to be confused with Rep. Sue Myrick of NC who is unrelated. In a radio interview with local WBT Anchor Tara Servatious, Susan reports that she has been keeping track of the number of votes in North Carolina of individuals over the age of 110 years and apparently we have quite a few, over 410 of the 110 year olds--to be exact-- actually voted via absentee ballot on October the 28th. Yes indeed, now it would appear that good ole NC has the market cornered on the Centenarian vote.
At latest count, Susan has garnered a total Absentee Ballot vote of over 2,660 people over the age of 110. Someone contact the Guiness Book and warm up the Ford, the Fountain of Youth exists and its right here in lovely NC. It's no wonder people are moving here in droves--maybe the use of tobacco isn't such a bad thing after all? But, on a more serious note, with all of the irregularities going on all over the place, we can now begin to wonder about a few things.
Apparently those ultra-healthy seniors over 110 have aged and are now astoundingly over 112 years old, and are still able to make it to the polls ahead of time.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Obamacrats are set to steal this election and/or riot in the streets of the large urban centers.
A prelude to election night:
It’s a war ! No more democracy with dhimmycraps.
Beat them on their own ground . All the elderly must vote Romney
Yep stop whining but FIGHT them!
Its was a mistale, a mistake, and administrative oversight, I tell you!/S
Someone needs to do some jail time.
I think you are onto something there. My guess is it is just a data entry error, and the date is being set to a default 1/1/1900. One clue is that the spike is suspiciously just one year. One would think that there should be an assortment of years unless the fraudulent voters were all in cahoots and all especially braindead.
They should still clear the matter up, though.
I wonder if the apparent “hockey stick” is just an artifact of a database that cannot handle birth dates prior to 1900?
I’m still highly suspicious. Standard mortality tables expect about one person in 100,000 to live to be 112 (or older). There were not 58,300,000 North Carolinian babies in 1900 and I do not for one minute believe the deficiency was made up by an inrush of retires. Some further Wikipedia research indicates that there are only 4,400 Americans over the age of 100, and only one in 1000 centenarians lives to be 110. The number of people over the age of 112 in North Carolina (population 9,600,000) cannot exceed 10, at the most. In point of fact the “expected” number of North Carolinians aged 110 would be about 0.14, or only about one chance in seven of even one such individual.
Given the nonsense that went on in 2000, I was really hoping Dubya would move decisively on the election integrity front. Another area where he failed us.
According to Obama's Social Security Card he is 122 years old as it was issued to someone born in 1890.
Someone at the mailing address for those absentee ballots should be charged and convicted of voter fraud.
Too bad nothing will happen.
A guy in Calif called the Larry Elder show and told him he got an absentee ballot for his dog.
If they do and succeed because the GOP lacks the desire to do so then we did not lose a thing.
If they do and succeed because the GOP lacks the desire to do something about it then we did not lose a thing.
Strong penalites, strong voter i.d. verification. At least as strong as it is to get a drivers license in Fla.
ok, if this is true, WHAT are they doing about it? And WHO is doing something about this?! If this has been reported, then SOMETHING should be done to correct this! Boy this makes me very angry.
The voter file I downloaded from a Franklin Ohio has year of birth on it.
They could be fake registrations, or previous real ones (deaths not properly recorded by the elections office).
OMG - 1189 of them have birth dates of 1800. Another 43 have birth dates in the 1800’s.
202 Democrats with a recorded birth date of 1800. 14 other centenarians.
15 other centenarians.
249 other centenarians.
1 unaffiliated voter born in 2005 (7 yrs. old?)
Romney should use tonights debate to bring attention to it. Use foreign vote fraud as a segway into it.
I could have gotten one for my father who has been deceased two years. I emailed the georgia secretary of state with my displeasure. They put me in touch with my local county, and after a few days, my father was finally removed from the voting rolls. He would have been horribly dishonored, if a democrat had voted with his name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.