Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Are What Barack Says ^ | October 22, 2012 | Dan Holler

Posted on 10/22/2012 6:35:19 AM PDT by Kaslin

Remember the old saying “you are what you eat?” Well, in President Obama’s America, you are what the federal government says you are.

Throughout last week’s debate, the President constantly referred to what he would do or how the government would take action. While giving lip service to America’s free enterprise system, he said “I also believe that everybody should have a fair shot and everybody should do their fair share and everybody should play by the same rules, because that's how our economy is grown.”

Who defines what is a fair shot? President Obama. Who decides if you’re doing your fair share? President Obama.

His message – and arguably his philosophical core – is that the government is in a better position to help you and than you are to help yourself.

When questioned on “inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females” – a dubious and factually challenged premise – President Obama fell into a common refrain, touting federal action. He told Katherine Fenton that “this is one of the reasons why one of the first -- the first bill I signed was something called the Lily Ledbetter bill.”

As Heritage explained earlier this year, “When work experience, education, occupation, and hours of work are taken into account, the average woman makes 98 cents for every dollar earned by a man.” That not only makes the President’s government-centric answer seem absurd, but it provides the proper context for Mitt Romney’s answer, which emphasized a strong economy and “adapting to a flexible work schedule that gives women opportunities that they would otherwise not be able to afford.”

After the debate, President Obama’s former green jobs czar Van Jones told CNN that “America’s government should be a partner to American mothers” and we should “make sure by law.” Huh? I guess you can expect a knock on your door followed by, “ma’am, we’re from the post office and we’re here to help you raise your kids.”

Obviously this goes beyond how to raise our children and what type of binders we keep our women in. Just take the most recent attack on conservative Medicare reform. Heritage explains the new hit piece by the Kaiser Family Foundation essentially “assumes that an entire class of Americans—senior citizens—is insensitive to price.”

The statist argument goes like this: once seniors pick a plan, as they have done with Medicare Part D, they rarely switch even when other options are available. Now, a new poll finds that 90% of seniors are happy with their Part D coverage, but happiness be damned because the statists think seniors aren’t choosing the most cost-effective plans.

Oh, while we’re on health care, do remember President Obama’s “play by the same rules” line? Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) recently pointed out that “Obamacare exempted Medigap insurance – a market AARP dominates – from virtually all its new mandates, including the ban on preexisting condition discrimination.”

Of course, none of us should be surprised. This is the logical conclusion of the professional left’s crony-infused “you didn’t build that” philosophy.

Speaking of cronyism, President Obama said, “we're helping them and small businesses to export all around the world to new markets.” To be clear, small businesses were exporting to countries around the world before 2009. Some were even using taxpayer-backed loans courtesy of the Export-Import Bank, which is the basis of the President’s claim…a claim dripping with hypocrisy.

In 2008, then-Senator Obama called the ExIm Bank “little more than a fund for corporate welfare.” In the course of making his case to the American people that he deserves four more years, he is now praising the very same corporate welfare he derided four years earlier. Notice that he is emphasizing the small business aspect, as opposed to the airlines and Fortune 500 companies that continue to benefit.

What is an example of a small business benefiting? Well, a coffee shop owner in Seattle got a taxpayer-backed loan “to start a business in his native country of Ethiopia to sell milk.” Taxpayers are backing the financing of the milk-related equipment, which is made in America. Under the guise of increasing exports, you are essentially betting on a startup milk distribution business in Ethiopia. Brilliant!

President Obama also had this gem during last week’s debate: “I want to build manufacturing jobs in this country again.” The irony here is that he never built manufacturing jobs in America to begin with.

The bottom line, though, is that President Obama has a very Washington-centric view of the economy, health care and even women. He firmly believes that the bureaucrats in Washington can dictate the future of America’s economy, make your health care decisions and make binderless women happy.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012election; barackobama; healthcare; unemployment; women

1 posted on 10/22/2012 6:35:23 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Well, in President Obama’s America, you are what the federal government says you are.

Sorry, but we've been what the federal government 'says we are' loooong before the pResident showed up.

The truly sad and disheartening thing is even quite a few Freepers think they have the legitimate ability to do so!


2 posted on 10/22/2012 6:42:49 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as Created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I guess you can expect a knock on your door followed by, “Ma’am, we’re from the post office and we’re here to help you raise your kids.”

"Thank you very much. When my husband gets home, tell him I took the credit card and the baby and caught a plane to South America."

3 posted on 10/22/2012 9:20:16 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("You know I'm always there for you," he told her, as he hurried out the door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Many leftists claim that they think everyone should have the same opportunities for success in life. While that notion may sound fine if one doesn’t think about what it really means, it in fact directly contradicts the notion that parents have the right to invest their own time and money to improve their children’s future. It’s too bad more people don’t see the contradiction, since the latter notion should be readily seen as being far more important. If some parents are allowed to invest their time and money so as to improve their children’s future, the children of parents who do not invest as much must necessarily be at a disadvantage compared with those whose parents invest more. In order for everyone to be born with the same opportunities in line, one would have to forbid any parents from being any better than others. Some communists may like such notion, but reasonable people should recognize it as evil.

4 posted on 10/22/2012 4:21:55 PM PDT by supercat (Renounce Covetousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson