Skip to comments.CBS News: Why didnít we send the military to rescue Benghazi personnel?
Posted on 10/22/2012 6:46:25 AM PDT by Snuph
video at link...y now weve gotten the basic details of the terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi no thanks to the White House, which tried to pass it off as a spontaneous demonstration that spun out of contro for more than a week after the attack. Not too many people may have understood that the attack lasted for seven hours, however and that American military assets were in easy reach. The last two Americans who died had managed to survive six hours into the attack.
CBS News Sharyl Attkisson asked the obvious question yesterday: If we could fly an unarmed drone over the consulate while it was under attack, why didnt we send the military in to rescue our people?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Clinton Broadcast System, at it again...
On top of that the really ugly story...that 15K MANPADS are loose because of our ill-conceived and poorly executed operation in Libya would have to come out.
Sounds like the opposite. The President is the Commander in Chief.
Why didn't he allow these folks to be rescued?
Oh no...this is the work of the Clinton's. CBS would never turn on obama on their own. Bill Clinton is behind this one...I'd bet my bottom dollar.
“Why didn’t he allow these folks to be rescued?”
You are exactly right and this is the real question. WHY?
He was comfortable with the way things were going.
Besides, he needed his sleep so he could do his fund raisers.
Big day coming up, you know.
Someone here on FR said it well a couple days ago.
“It is easier to ‘splain away four dead Americans than to risk killing muzzies who will claim collateral damage to civilians”
There was never any intention of sending a rescue - this decision right from the top.
Chris Stevens was SENT to Benghazi on direct orders from no less than the Current Occupant of the White Hut. Without a security detail, without even a personal sidearm, going into a known trouble spot, which had already previously been targeted by the same bunch of bandits.
Chris Stevens, and the three persons accompanying him, were sacrificial lambs, sent to show our “open hand” supposedly extended to indicate our “peaceful intentions”. That hand certainly got slapped away.
If a rescue HAD been mounted, it would have negated the entire thrust of this pseudo-diplomatic move, which was ONLY to demonstrate our good will, and to beg the Islamic jihadists’ forgiveness, doncha know.
Zero’s style is to lead from behind. That means taking no risks.
He’s a pro at sending in the drones but scared to death of launching helos and putting boots on the ground.
Allah forbid that something should go wrong, especially in this election season. He’d have nobody to blame it on, not even Hillary.
He and Klinton were no doubt so fearful of another Blackhawk Down that they were frozen in place. They chose to do nothing rather than launch a rescue that could have saved the life of his own ambassador!!
Stevens was not supposed to be rescued. He was supposed to be kidnapped, so that Obama could secure his release and look the hero right before the election. When the former SEALS happened to be there to intervene, the whole thing unraveled.
I know it sounds conspiratorial, but so far it's the only scenario that makes any sense to me. BTW, when will Obama release the autopsy reports of our fallen compatriots? It's been over a month; what is there to hide there as well?
“If I were in Congress I would ask CDRAFRICOM this question. What does there NEO plan say? Was a contingency plan in place. Was this CONPLAN approved/disapproved and by whom? This CDR is key to this investigation”
House Armed Services Chairman asked to speak to these people last week and was blocked. Speaks volumes.
The consulate was the ambassadors work place. Perhaps Mr. Obama would like to call this work place violence.
This administration is not only without morals it is quite dangerous to our great nation nor does it hold the interests of our nation ahead of its socialist quasi Marxist ideology.
This administration is a threat to our nation.
Fear (cowardice) of launching a miltary rescue had nothing to do with it. This was a calculated decision deemed more optimal than a conducting a fullscale rescue mission with all of the risks and ramifications of revealing a failed foreign policy. Blaming it on street violence brought on by an obscure video and publicly perp walk the "hate crime" producer with a platoon of deputies and a horde of news media in the dead of night was the method to keep the illusion alive.
This was worse than mere cowardice to act. This was negligent homicide to hide the lie that Obama is the great arab spring peacemaker and al qaeda vanquisher.
Good question, and Romney needs to ask it tonight of Dear leader.
Benghazi is a port city, readily accessible from a multitude of military assets stationed around the region.
Also, if the British and French consules left the area along with the Red Cross, what the hell were we still doing there?
This smells like a setup—just like CNN’s 11th-hour demand that Crowley be allowed to conduct followup discussion. That led to her interjection. This is just too easy—something’s up. DO NOT TRUST CBS ANMORE THAN CNN.
This smells like a setup—just like CNN’s 11th-hour demand that Crowley be allowed to conduct followup discussion. That led to her interjection. This is just too easy—something’s up. DO NOT TRUST CBS ANYORE THAN CNN.
Judge Jeanine Investigates Benghazi Gate Part 4 - 10/20/2012 video 6:53
Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer (U.S. Army ret.), former CIA Station Chief Gary Burtson and former CIA operative Mike Baker
How long any of them lasted is irrelevant. No one could have known who died when or in which compound at the time. The only question is "why was nothing done to try to help them?" Only ONE MAN had the authority to send a rescue team onto foreign soil. We know what his choice was.
Thank you everyone!
There is no such thing as journalism.
Has there been any reports as to how many of the attackers were killed?