Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama hit for 'securing the dictator vote'
The Washington Examiner ^ | 10/22/12 | Gary Bauer

Posted on 10/22/2012 12:15:45 PM PDT by Wolf13

Obama has secured the dictator vote...does he have yours?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012endorsements; bauer; bho2012; commievote; cuba; election; obama

1 posted on 10/22/2012 12:15:46 PM PDT by Wolf13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolf13

What would Obama have done differently:

If he wanted to destroy our Constitution?

If he wanted to destroy the American economy?

If he wanted to destroy America’s standing in the world?

If he wanted to undermine our Military?

If he hated America?

If he were Communist?

If he wanted to “Fundamentally Transform America”?


2 posted on 10/22/2012 12:17:19 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Excellent response.

If bound by “free will”, what would Satan do differently?


3 posted on 10/22/2012 12:38:01 PM PDT by Gator113 (I would have voted for NEWT, now it's Ryan and the other guy.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Exactly what he has done.Using the system to destroy itself, a cache of the Obama movement.


4 posted on 10/22/2012 12:42:28 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolf13

5 posted on 10/22/2012 12:53:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

If his BFF was (and is) Wm Ayers?


6 posted on 10/22/2012 12:56:50 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolf13

Make a great TV spot...the four dictators endorse Obama.


7 posted on 10/22/2012 1:00:23 PM PDT by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
First: I'm no Obama fan, nor am I a Romney fan, but I'll take a stab at these.

"If he wanted to destroy our Constitution?

Consider what the constitution is and does. It sets up an elected legislative and president and provides for the judiciary as a third check. To destroy our constitution, he'd need to undermine one or more of these. If that was his goal, he's been almost completely ineffective. Obama has used a stalemated congress to expand the power of the presidency. But the legislative side can bring that back under control very quickly.

"If he wanted to destroy the American economy?"

He would have stopped TARP loans to banks and let them fail. He would have pushed more free trade so that our jobs redistributed overseas. He would have encouraged the Federal Reserve to not provide liquidity to the market. He didn't do any of these so I can't believe his goal was to destroy our economy. On the otherhand, his misguided attempts to steer us towards clean energy DID raise energy costs and DID impact the economy. And he largely wasted the stimulus funds he was given.

"If he wanted to destroy America’s standing in the world?"He'd subject us to UN control. And decimate our military. And probably pull completely out of the conflicts. Again, I'd rank him a failure if that was his goal. Our standing is not diminished by one idiot President doing an apology tour.

If he wanted to undermine our Military?

He'd cut funding to the military. As a last resort he'd set up a fiscal cliff for the military sort of like the Republicans did.

"If he hated America?"

He'd have used our military against us. He'd change a lot more than he did. Sorry I don't see it.

"If he were Communist?"

He'd undermine free elections. He'd take over industries and make them property of the state. He'd make sure that government had a majority stake not a minority. He wouldn't ever sell the equities, even to China.

"If he wanted to “Fundamentally Transform America”?"

I think that's covered by the previous questions. Unless you mean that he wanted to teach youth to hate democrats for changing their school food.

Sorry, Obama may be a Muslim Manchurian candidate, but if those were his goals, he's a colossal failure.

8 posted on 10/22/2012 3:31:16 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Obama HAS undermined Constitutional checks and balances via his czars and regulators within HHS, EPA, the Justice Dept. negligence, and numerous other abuses.
Saying that “the legislative side can bring this back under control” is simply ignoring the reality of what is actually happening.

Obama is destroying the American economy by expanding our indebtedness, while crushing the private sector.
You demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of the consequences of letting the banks fail, which isn’t surprising given your opposition to free trade.
The Federal Reserve didn’t “provide liquidity to the markets”, they printed money we don’t have and mortgaged our future in the process.
Your “on the other hand” examples are precisely the proof of his ill intent for the economy.

Obama IS setting the stage for UN Control! Did you notice who will monitoring our elections? Are you aware of his current efforts to support a UN tax on all of us? Did you happen to notice Obama’s support for the UN imposing gun control on U.S. citizens?

How is it that you don’t consider cutting the Military budget by $1 Trillion “decimating our military”???
And where did you get the notion that the fiscal cliff was a Republican objective?

How do you suppose he would use our military against us? Do you really think members of the military would just blindly follow orders to attack America citizens?

Perhaps you hadn’t noticed that opposing voter I.D. IS “undermining free elections”?
He HAS taken over industries, or hadn’t you noticed that he won’t allow G.M. to buy back shares from the government, or that he has strong armed the banks to withhold loans. He’s shutting down the coal industry, chasing oil rigs from our coasts, fighting fracking, and any other realistic and productive energy sources.

Obama clearly stated at the close of the last election than his goal was to “Fundamentally Transform America”, which is why I have it in quotes!


9 posted on 10/22/2012 9:39:07 PM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
"Obama HAS undermined Constitutional checks and balances via his czars and regulators within HHS, EPA, the Justice Dept. negligence, and numerous other abuses."

It's hard to say that the czars aren't really within the perogative of the Executive. He would have been wiser not to call them czars. But I'm pretty sure the President could always create an office within a department and assign them a special task. More concerning than the creation of the offices is the people Obama staffed them with.

Obama is destroying the American economy by expanding our indebtedness, while crushing the private sector. You demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of the consequences of letting the banks fail, which isn’t surprising given your opposition to free trade.

It is free trade which is crushing the private sector. We are letting any and every third world country with excess labor take our jobs away.

Letting some banks fail is fine. Letting banks fail in mass leads to a very deep depression.

10 posted on 10/23/2012 10:03:42 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
How is it that you don’t consider cutting the Military budget by $1 Trillion “decimating our military”??? And where did you get the notion that the fiscal cliff was a Republican objective?

Wasn't it a republican controlled House that agreed to this sequestration nightmare? We had the purse strings and this is what we came up with. Were they thinking this would embarrass the Democrats?

The truth is we probably do need to cut the military some, but only after assuring that we have a super strong military. We just fought two wars which drove the military expense up. Why do we need to keep it at that level indefinitely? President Bush kept the war costs separate from the normal budget, so that we would be able to scale back down after the wars were over. Obama folded them into the budget so that it would be harder to cut. Again, I'm for a super strong military, but it's time to ask what do we need and what are we getting for that increased level of funding.

11 posted on 10/23/2012 10:12:12 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson