Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Go Behind the Scenes of Atlas Shrugged Part II {email video}
YouTube ^ | 23 Oct 2012

Posted on 10/23/2012 9:38:48 PM PDT by shove_it

Follow Director John Putch, actors Esai Morales (Frisco) and Jason Beghe (Hank), and the rest of the Atlas Shrugged Part II cast and crew, as we go behind the scenes at Rearden Steel.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: atlasshrugged

1 posted on 10/23/2012 9:38:56 PM PDT by shove_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shove_it; Admin Moderator

OOPSIE! Wrong link

Go here:

Moderator, please correct the link or delete this thread.

2 posted on 10/23/2012 9:45:59 PM PDT by shove_it (DNC = perpetual emotion machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shove_it
One has to wonder why movies like this don’t do well. I guess even conservatives don’t like movies too heavy with ideology?
3 posted on 10/23/2012 10:01:24 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee
all in all..(still :) a good movie.

4 posted on 10/23/2012 10:07:25 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Anger a Conservative by telling a lie. Anger a Liberal by telling the truth. - RWR 8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

I won’t watch a movie that takes Christ’ Name in vain. That was their first mistake. They can do a movie and leave out using God’s Name in vain. You don’t violate this principal. It is primary over even thinking that you are making your movie more believable.

5 posted on 10/24/2012 12:37:15 AM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

While I agree with the idea that Christ should not be a vulgarity in speach, please understand what God meant when He directed that His ‘name’ not be taken in vain.

God’s purpose and directive is that His power and authority not be abused by men. Not that His personal name be bantied about casually. The same concept is when the police once said “Stop, in the name of the law”. This is critical to the idea and should never be taken lightly. Since the law has no personal name, it would be impossible to say “Stop, in the name of Steve” just the same as it would be to take the Lord’s name in vain. Since the Hebrews did not know the personal name of God, then they could not misuse His personal name so the Commandment would have been a waste if that was God’s intent. The Almighty knew that men in power and authority would (and did) use His power and authority for purposes never intended by God. God did not codify anything about personal names. Instead He forbid the abuse of His authority.

6 posted on 10/24/2012 3:37:37 AM PDT by rjsimmon (1-20-2013 The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson