Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Stoked Violence with Benghazi Blame Game
Townhall.com ^ | October 25, 2012 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 10/25/2012 4:10:49 AM PDT by Kaslin

It is no surprise by now that the White House is engaged in a full-blown cover-up of the 9/11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. First, the Obama administration blamed a YouTube video insulting Islam for the violence, saying a mob protesting the film got out of control, leading to the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty and Information Management Officer Sean Smith. We now know through multiple reports and emails that the White House and as many as 400 national security officials knew within two hours of the attack that it was carried out by terrorists linked to al Qaeda.

But let’s take a look at the deadly and violent consequences that came as a result of the Obama administration blaming the video after the initial planned attacks.

On September 11, the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya and the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, were attacked. The United States flag in both locations was torn down and al Qaeda flags were raised in their place. Neither event was a “spontaneous action.” The attack in Libya was pre-planned, with armed Islamic militants wielding RPGs leading the way. The riots in Egypt were pre-planned for 9/11 to protest the imprisonment of World Trade Center Bomber and "Blind Sheikh" Omar abdel Rahman, with al Qaeda sypathizers rallying the crowd.  

It was after the initial attack in Egypt that the administration threw free speech under the bus. The U.S Embassy in Cairo released the following statement on 9/11, the same day as the attacks. Notice “the video” isn’t mentioned.

“The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.”

A day later, the same argument with a specific reference to an anti-Islam video was used by administration officals to explain the attack in Benghazi, the place Americans were brutally murdered and where they left bloody finger streaks on the walls of the U.S. consulate.

Although the White House initially distanced itself from the embassy statement above, they had their straw man. Obama administration officials decided to push the argument that the amateur YouTube video insulting Islam, with just 300 views at the time, was the reason for the violence. A spontaneous protest of the film that spun out of control was the talking point.

Then, after Obama administration officials repeatedly blamed the YouTube video, the Muslim world erupted, with U.S. Embassies in multiple countries coming under siege, just as we saw with the Danish cartoon fiasco.

On September 14, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said, “The cause of the unrest was a video," adding, “The reason there is unrest is because of the film.”

In this case, Carney was actually telling the truth. The cause of the unrest was a result of a video, a video the Obama administration cynically promoted.  

In its attempt to avoid taking a political hit and to distract away from the fact al Qaeda is getting stronger, not weaker as President Obama has claimed on the campaign trail, the Obama administration successfully enraged radical Muslims around the world in more than 25 countries including Indonesia, Yemen, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Morocco, Tunisia, Bangladesh, Lebanon, Iraq, and London after the planned attacks in Libya and Egypt. The administration’s efforts to blame the video fanned the deadly flames of anti-American sentiment around the world. In Pakistan alone, 17 people were killed.

We now know the YouTube video had nothing to do with sparking the attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi or the U.S. Embassy in Cairo on 9/11. However, we do know that the White House narrative of the video being responsible did give thousands of Muslims a reason to riot around the world. The Obama administration’s false talking points, attack on free speech and bogus narrative, put U.S. personnel further at risk, despite President Obama claiming his number one priority is to keep U.S. diplomats safe.

“My number one priority is always to keep our diplomats safe and to keep our embassies safe," Obama said during an interview with Univision on September 20.

The more the video was discussed, the worse the riots became. In front of the U.N. on September 25, President Obama said, “In every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask themselves how much they're willing to tolerate freedom for others. And that is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, where a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.”

President Obama sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world by promoting a film that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks on 9/11. The maker of that video was thrown in jail, and more people died. In the end, the “blame the video” move, or using humans as collateral damage, was one Obama was willing to make in order to save his re-election campaign.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: barackobama; benghazi; egypt; house; libya; radicalislam; statedepartment; violence

1 posted on 10/25/2012 4:10:55 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obama and his agents undoubtedly got people killed with their YouTube video misdirection and would do so again if it helped Obama’s reelection chances. A few deaths, or even many, would be viewed as simply a minor bump in the road to Obama’s reelection.
2 posted on 10/25/2012 4:24:27 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We can all see where Obama's true loyalty lies.


3 posted on 10/25/2012 4:24:39 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

That statement by the embassy has always bothered me. It seemed out of place, and almost as though it was made to start the ball rolling so to speak.


4 posted on 10/25/2012 4:33:43 AM PDT by Newton (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"President Obama sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world by promoting a film that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks on 9/11."

Excellent point! Everyone should stop and think about this because he is in fact an "instigator" and always has been.

5 posted on 10/25/2012 4:35:58 AM PDT by Old Badger (Don't bother me! I still like Palin because she will tell like it is! (Newt too!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

6 posted on 10/25/2012 4:36:46 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple. Fight ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These murders were planned by Obama and Clinton.

PLANNED IN ADVANCE.

The US Congress remains silent, because
they support the TREASON and must all (ALL) be replaced.


7 posted on 10/25/2012 4:39:07 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It furthers Obama’s anti-colonialist agenda.

If the rest of the Islamic countries hate America and make conducting business there impossible, that’s fine with him.

It means we can produce or import their oil, and it drives up our energy prices, given that he won’t allow production here.


8 posted on 10/25/2012 4:57:26 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Yes they were.


9 posted on 10/25/2012 5:47:36 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“President Obama sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world by promoting a film that had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks on 9/11. The maker of that video was thrown in jail, and more people died. In the end, the “blame the video” move, or using humans as collateral damage, was one Obama was willing to make in order to save his re-election campaign.”
******************************************************

Absolute fact.


10 posted on 10/25/2012 6:19:44 AM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Newton

Any Media who helps this massive coverup should be broken—and its editors imprisoned for treason. This goes beyond party and liberalism-—This would not be permitted in most of the nations of the world today. Image if Obama was a Republican? he would be impeached (and he should be)—Look to see the Anti—GOP Press when Mitt is elected in a few days!


11 posted on 10/25/2012 6:25:48 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

12 posted on 10/25/2012 6:26:39 AM PDT by New Perspective (Proud father of a 8 yr old son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sources say counterterror chief reprimanded for calling Libya attack terror, White House denies

By Catherine Herridge

Published October 24, 2012

| FoxNews.com

Congressional sources tell Fox News that a top administration counterterrorism official was reprimanded by the White House last month after he testified that the Sept. 11 attack in Libya was terrorism.

The White House and the official are pushing back on the claim. But the allegation would appear to raise questions about recent administration statements that they were labeling the attack terrorism from the start.

Sources told Fox News that, in fact, the White House was unhappy with Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, after his Sept. 19 comments, and told him to tone it down afterward.

Olsen had told a Senate committee, in reference to the four Americans killed in the attack: “They were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/24/sources-say-counterterror-chief-reprimanded-for-calling-libya-attack-terror/print#ixzz2AJo5OWzC


13 posted on 10/25/2012 6:53:44 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Finally! Finally! I have been waiting for this to be written. The implications are staggering for those who can understand.


14 posted on 10/25/2012 1:31:37 PM PDT by Bravada (Wherever I Stand, I Stand With Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson