Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bombshell: Clinton Ordered More Security, Obama Denied Request
News Ninja ^ | 10/25/12 | staff

Posted on 10/25/2012 9:58:14 AM PDT by Nachum

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered additional security for the U.S. mission in Benghaziahead of the terrorist attack but the orders were never carried out, according to “legal counsel” to Clinton who spoke to best-selling author Ed Klein. Those same sources also say former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsninja2012.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazisecurity; billclinton; clinton; dsj; edklein; election2012; election3012; hillary; libya; more; obama; ordered; security; tyronwoods
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-130 next last
Vid at link
1 posted on 10/25/2012 9:58:15 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Who did not know that obama denied the security.
Well, now there is evidence.
The Clintons will destroy obama before they allow themselves to be destroyed.


2 posted on 10/25/2012 10:00:49 AM PDT by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Hahahahaha! The Democratic civil war just went from cold to hot. I didn’t think HillBillary would let themselves be thrown under that Canadian-built bus! LOL


3 posted on 10/25/2012 10:01:16 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Bombshell: Clinton Ordered More Security, Obama Denied Request

Rut Roh! 0bammy's got some big time 'splaining to do!

4 posted on 10/25/2012 10:01:25 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ( For AMERICA's sake: Vote for the Mormon, NOT the muslim; The Capitalist, NOT the Communist! FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Clintons, doing what’s necessary to survive politically.

The Chicago White House, doing what’s necessary to survive the election.

Charming people, all.


5 posted on 10/25/2012 10:01:40 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Clintons have decided to cut their losses. I was wondering how long it would take.


6 posted on 10/25/2012 10:02:32 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

ouch - that WOULD be the death knoll

Bill and Hill are finally getting payback at Obummer- they didnt see him coming last time, until it was too late.


7 posted on 10/25/2012 10:02:53 AM PDT by Mr. K ("The only thing the World would hate more than the USA in charge is the USA NOT in charge")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“October Surprise”, anyone?

If substantiated, Obama is freakin’ TOAST!


8 posted on 10/25/2012 10:05:30 AM PDT by Walrus (Restoring America starts today! Let's roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
"Who did not know that obama denied the security."

IIRC Wallace on Fox had reported that last week. He mentioned it while reporting a laundry list of other facts that had come to light. I have been shocked no one had mentioned it since.

9 posted on 10/25/2012 10:05:57 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: svcw

The Clintons are waiting to see if 0bama is going to lose the election anyway. If he wins, they can all probably cover it up enough that Hillary won’t get too damaged. Because she can always threaten to release the documents.

But if 0bama is going to lose, there will be no power to cover up and Hillary will get covered with crap just like 0bama. She won’t let that happen.

She can always say, 0bama was going to lose anyway so I am trying to salvage the future of the party.


10 posted on 10/25/2012 10:05:59 AM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Clintoon appoint fall-guys. They don’t volunteer for the job.


11 posted on 10/25/2012 10:06:55 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Hillary’s October surprise. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.


12 posted on 10/25/2012 10:08:27 AM PDT by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
1. After persistent requests, he refused to authorize adequate security.
2. Once the fight started, he refused to authorize forces to rescue American lives, deciding instead to watch them all die after an 8 hour struggle.
13 posted on 10/25/2012 10:09:14 AM PDT by ryan71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Timing is everything. If the Clintons want to sink Obama, expect early next week as the time to make maximum impact. Dominate the week’s news cycle and leave Obama just a weekend (which is typically not an effective time) to bounce back before election day.


14 posted on 10/25/2012 10:10:57 AM PDT by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Oh, this is great. When have the Clintons ever been part of any “team” other than their own? Obama should have known that but was either too stupid or he was arrogant enough to think he could out-fox the Clintons. When you ride the tiger and fall off, you get eaten sometimes.


15 posted on 10/25/2012 10:11:59 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

If it weren’t for the election I’d expect a serious move to impeach.


16 posted on 10/25/2012 10:12:45 AM PDT by Mobties (Let the markets work! Reduce the government's footprint!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“I called for additional security ... but somehow it didn’t make it to the President ... someone screwed up somewhere, and we’re going to get to the bottom of it.”


17 posted on 10/25/2012 10:12:51 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walrus
If substantiated, Obama is freakin’ TOAST!

Maybe. One must remember that the typical Obama supporter doesn't care whether Obama denied security to the consulate or not. And the percentage of undecided remaining is miniscule.

18 posted on 10/25/2012 10:13:23 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I recall hearing this on Bret Baier’s special about Benghazi. He said it rather quickly and went on. Did not elaborate on it. He said State Dept approved the request for additional security, but no further action was taken.


19 posted on 10/25/2012 10:16:30 AM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobties
If it weren’t for the election I’d expect a serious move to impeach.

Neither the house nor the senate would go that route. That would be racist.(sarc)

20 posted on 10/25/2012 10:17:58 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

If you throw in Jarrett and Axelrod, I vote for “too arrogant”.


21 posted on 10/25/2012 10:21:56 AM PDT by rod1 (CTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Unless it were a direct order from POTUS to cut security, why would the SoS need POTUS authorization for diplomatic security?

That would be like a local Bank of America branch needing approval from the corporate CEO to hire an additional security guard.

==

If POTUS is making decisions on that level, he doesn’t need a SoS.


22 posted on 10/25/2012 10:24:21 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

BOOM - this is big! Tweet it Facebook it Send it to Drudge!


23 posted on 10/25/2012 10:27:53 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
The Clintons have decided to cut their losses. I was wondering how long it would take.
Hillary wants to be viable for 2016. Period.
24 posted on 10/25/2012 10:28:12 AM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Potentially hugh and series!


25 posted on 10/25/2012 10:30:06 AM PDT by vanilla swirl (searching for something meaningful to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

26 posted on 10/25/2012 10:31:59 AM PDT by McGruff (Obama lied. Heroes died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Chuckster
Hillary’s October surprise. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.


28 posted on 10/25/2012 10:33:54 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Reported anywhere else? Haven’t seen this at other sites.


29 posted on 10/25/2012 10:34:15 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

30 posted on 10/25/2012 10:34:18 AM PDT by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

>> One must remember that the typical Obama supporter doesn’t care whether Obama denied security to the consulate or not. <<

Actually, the typical Obama supporter doesn’t even know that there’s an issue with Benghazi, much less any of the details discussed in forums like this. They are truly clueless, which is why the MSM still has so much power.

When this is all over, IF Romney wins, some serious thought has to be given to raising the bar in grade schools and high schools so that kids reaching the age of 18 have some understanding of the basic principles upon which our country was founded. Otherwise it’s just a matter of time....assuming it’s not already too late.


31 posted on 10/25/2012 10:35:10 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Norseman

I should add, in fairness, that far too many Romney voters are also clueless about Benghazi, again due to the complicity of the MSM.


32 posted on 10/25/2012 10:37:13 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left-Completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All


Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


33 posted on 10/25/2012 10:38:29 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Diplomad posted that he thought Stevens only nominally reported to Clinton. Makes sense.

Intelligence.

I have said from the beginning that Benghazi had the hallmarks of CIA but people didn’t think so. They thought he was an ordinary Ambassador.

Not so.

He got his orders from someone other than Clinton.

Drudge has up that Clinton might stay in her position a big longer- whatever that means.

And I don’t buy that B&C are having fights about releasing info.

That is just to make her look good.


34 posted on 10/25/2012 10:38:30 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Norseman
Actually, the typical Obama supporter doesn’t even know that there’s an issue with Benghazi, much less any of the details discussed in forums like this.

That's why it's been nigh impossible to erode the Bamster's base. They are behind a firewall of ignorance.

35 posted on 10/25/2012 10:40:35 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mobties

Wrong Party.............to see that happen.


36 posted on 10/25/2012 10:40:51 AM PDT by Osage Orange ( Liberalism, ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

No more spiking of the football by the dems with the death of Bin Laden w/out invoking the death of Amb. Stevens and 3 other Americans.


37 posted on 10/25/2012 10:41:52 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
I called for additional security ... but somehow it didn’t make it to the President ... someone screwed up somewhere, and we’re going to get to the bottom of it

Come on people Hillary is covering her Butt and Obama's

Some underling is going to get blamed

All this conjecture about the Clinton's getting even etc etc is just dreaming
38 posted on 10/25/2012 10:42:43 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

“Haven’t seen this at other sites.”

And you won’t. This won’t be covered at all. The media is counting on the fact that only political wonks like us will be aware of it. And, even if Obama supporters become aware, they won’t care. They’ll be weighing four dead Americans compliments of Obama against free ‘Bamaphones. The ‘Bamaphones will win.


39 posted on 10/25/2012 10:43:32 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush
Hillary wants to be viable for 2016.

Er... Hillary's 'viability' left the toothpaste tube a long time ago.


40 posted on 10/25/2012 10:43:58 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Unless it were a direct order from POTUS to cut security, why would the SoS need POTUS authorization for diplomatic security?

I suspect that Hillary is, and was always intended to be, a figurehead with no real power. That Obama delegated the real running of State to Susan Rice, with Susan reporting to Valerie Jarrett. In that set-up, any order that Hillary makes has to go through Rice, who can tell Obama to issue an override.

I suspect, as other FReepers suspect, that there was something going on in Libya that Obama did not want coming to light.

41 posted on 10/25/2012 10:44:59 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (political correctness is communist thought control, disguised as good manners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
0bama was notified immediately and automatically when the Benghazi consulate triggered the "Critical Incident Report" alert. He did nothing.

Judge Jeanine Investigates Benghazi Gate Part 4 - 10/20/2012 video 6:53
Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer (U.S. Army ret.), former CIA Station Chief Gary Burtson and former CIA operative Mike Baker

They confirm everything Col. Hunt said about automatic notifications to the WH and add more details.

Howie Carr interview with Col. Hunt On The Newest Libyan Revelations audio 28:37

There are three scandals here...

---------------------------------------------------------

For weeks now I have thought that the denial of requests for security were a dereliction of duty. I consider the lies and misdirection about the "video" after the attack to be fraud and malfeasance under the color of authority. I don't consider the inaction during the attack to be any of those.

The failure to act during the attack is the direct equivalent of desertion IMO.

ONE man had the authority to act that night.

ONE man deserted his post!

42 posted on 10/25/2012 10:45:29 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All
whoa! w/ that recent photo....
in effect...$. Clintoon is saying: "It's time to (really ;) cover my @$$ time....get ready for '16"
Hey, $HRILLary; Please use a Heavy Paper Grocery Bag! ..a two bagger???

43 posted on 10/25/2012 10:58:37 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Anger a Conservative by telling a lie. Anger a Liberal by telling the truth. - RWR 8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
That's why it's been nigh impossible to erode the Bamster's base.

Hell with double digit inflation and interest rates and high unemployment and foreign policy disasters Carter got 43% and that was 32 years ago

Many more brainwashed individuals have been turned out by our left wing schools since then

Fighting a War and with a great economy and as incumbent Bush only beat TRAITOR Kerry by one state
The commies taking the schools and TV/Newspapers and Hollywood have succeeded
44 posted on 10/25/2012 10:59:25 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yes, Hillary will not be seen as a traitor to the Democratic party.

That is why this will be leaked. Plausible deniability remains.


45 posted on 10/25/2012 11:00:54 AM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

” former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.”

If true Hillary has O by the short hairs.


46 posted on 10/25/2012 11:01:12 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ((God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I love this photo. Haven’t seen it in years!


47 posted on 10/25/2012 11:02:07 AM PDT by RexBeach (Mr. Obama Loves To Spend My $$$$$$$$$$$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

A firewall of ignorance...so true! That made me laugh out loud.


48 posted on 10/25/2012 11:03:23 AM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Make this go viral!


49 posted on 10/25/2012 11:03:28 AM PDT by blondee123 (Our country is headed for DICTATORSHIP! WAKE UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
One must remember that the typical Obama supporter doesn't care whether Obama denied security to the consulate or not.

Exactly. All they care about is getting their free stuff from 0bama's stash.

50 posted on 10/25/2012 11:14:01 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson